Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Roman Emperor Who Had Books about “Chemeia” Burned in Alexandria
Gloria Romanorum ^ | May 5, 2021 | Florentius

Posted on 05/06/2021 6:44:44 AM PDT by Antoninus

It is a common these days to hear folks opine about how the glories of ancient science were snuffed out ignominiously by triumphalist, fanatical Christians sometime in the Dark Ages. Normally, specific instances of this destruction are not called out, save for the case of Hypatia of Alexandria who has been elevated by modern audiences to a sort of proto-feminist demi-goddess of science for her slaying at the hands of a Christian mob.

Yet, for those who maintain the trope that Christianity was responsible for the destruction of centuries of amazing scientific advancements wrought by Greco-Roman civilization, please allow me to present this interesting tidbit.

There is a great, encyclopedic work of the Byzantine middle ages called the Suda. The Suda is a lexicon of Greek terms which was compiled in about the 10th century AD. Far from a mere word-list, the Suda contains definitions and context for the terms listed (over 30,000 of them all told) and includes toponyms, the names of persons, and biographies of numerous ancient and medieval figures. It seems to have been created from a variety of ancient sources, many of which are now no longer extant. For more about this massive work of ancient scholarship, and the brilliant efforts of many dedicated contemporary scholars to make it accessible to everyone, see The Suda Online.

I recently ran across a random passage in James Partington’s 1957 book entitled, A Short History of Chemistry. In this book, Partington explains that little is known today about ancient chemistry because much of what was written down did not survive antiquity. He says that the word “Chemistry” first appeared in a Roman edict in which all books of the Egyptians in Alexandria on the topic of chemeia are ordered to be burnt. Partington explains that the chemeia refers to the making of gold and silver, or what we would think of today as alchemy, which Partington points out is nothing more than the word chemeia with the Arabic article al affixed to it. Partington intimates that his source for this information is the Suda.

So off to the Suda Online I went. Lo and behold, here’s the entry for chemeia (χημεία) ~

[Meaning] the preparation of silver and gold. Diocletian sought out and burned books about this. [It is said] that due to the Egyptians' revolting behavior Diocletian treated them harshly and murderously. After seeking out the books written by the ancient [Egyptians] concerning the alchemy of gold and silver, he burned them so that the Egyptians would no longer have wealth from such a technique, nor would their surfeit of money in the future embolden them against the Romans.

So did you get that? The Roman emperor who mandated that books on chemeia be burned was not Constantine, Theodosius, Justinian or any other Christian emperor. It was Diocletian, the architect of the Great Persecution of Christians himself. Recall that it was also Diocletian who decreed that Christian books should be burned, so this is certainly not out of character for him.

And yes, as we can find in other sources, there was a serious rebellion in Egypt during Diocletian’s reign. This insurrection caused him such distress that when he finally re-conquered the city after a siege of eight months, he determined that he would put everyone who supported the rebellion to the sword and would not stop killing until the blood reached up to his horse's knees. Read more in Diocletian and the Roman Recovery.

Finally, I will point out that the works of at least two authors writing on alchemy post-Diocletian have survived antiquity, largely thanks to the preservation efforts of Christian Byzantine and Muslim Arabic scholars of the Middle Ages. The first is Zosimus of Panopolis in upper Egypt of the 4th century AD. The second is Stephanos of Alexandria, an philosopher who later migrated to Constantinople in the early 6th century AD.


TOPICS: History; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: alchemy; apologists; bookburning; chemeia; darkages; diocletian; egypti; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; lateantiquity; romanempire; superstition; theblackarts; thesuda; thesudaonline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Next time you hear someone say that Christianity was responsible for the destruction of ancient science, show them this.
1 posted on 05/06/2021 6:44:44 AM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Very interesting history. Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 05/06/2021 6:47:21 AM PDT by PGalt (Past Peak Civilization?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Chemistry........................


3 posted on 05/06/2021 6:49:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

4 posted on 05/06/2021 6:49:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How do you post those pictures in your article replies?


5 posted on 05/06/2021 7:09:46 AM PDT by bhive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The destruction of the Alexandrian library likely happened in stages, with some public spaces being destroyed as early as under Julius Caesar.

But there is a difference between destroying a public building and destroying the books.

It should be noted though that many Muslims themselves hold that the destruction of scrolls that occurred under Umar starting in 641 had them being used as fuel for fires for the baths years.


6 posted on 05/06/2021 7:22:26 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The fanatical Christians that burned books were led by Girolamo Savonarola, 1452-1498 who later became Pope.

Whatever survived until 620 AD was destroyed by the Muslims because it either contradicted the koran, or was already mentioned in it. What was preserved by a few muslims were works that interested them. All else they destroyed.

The muslims are single handily responsible for the destruction of Classical Western Civilization, Classical Christianity and the majority of written works that survived until the 620-661 AD period.

The Roman Diocletian 284 - 305 AD book burning was long preceded by burning of the Library of Alexandria of which various people are blamed from Julius Caesar in 48 BC to Mark Antony to Theophilus to the muslims in 640 AD.


7 posted on 05/06/2021 7:23:57 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF
The fanatical Christians that burned books were led by Girolamo Savonarola, 1452-1498 who later became Pope.

That's an inauspicious beginning to your post, so I didn't bother reading the rest. No, Savanarola never became Pope--not even close. In fact, he was excommunicated (he called the Church "a whore") and later executed and burned by ecclesiastical and civil authorities in Florence.

Good grief.
8 posted on 05/06/2021 7:30:03 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Personally I think much of the library would have been destroyed by the great Earthquake and Tidal Wave that covered Alexandria about 35 years before the library was “burnt”.

https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/tsunami-hits-alexandria-egypt


9 posted on 05/06/2021 7:30:40 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar ((Democrats have declared us to be THE OBSOLETE MAN in the Twilight Zone.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bhive

< i m g s r c = [[url of image, less these square brackets ]] >

And then remove the extra spaces, leaving a space between img and src at the start. But leave the angle brackets.


10 posted on 05/06/2021 7:32:02 AM PDT by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Islam killed the Hellenic world.

I was doing just fine until the Muslims came along.


11 posted on 05/06/2021 7:36:34 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Bookmark


12 posted on 05/06/2021 7:38:44 AM PDT by Fiddlstix ((Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Islam killed the Hellenic world.

Islam killed it in the east, though some of the more enlightened Islamic states preserved some of it.

The Vandals, Lombards, Huns and Sclavenes really trashed things in the West. There's a reason they were called barbarians after all.
13 posted on 05/06/2021 7:43:25 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

So the Romans were not in favor of alchemy.


14 posted on 05/06/2021 8:04:40 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry L Smith
So the Romans were not in favor of alchemy.

Uhhh, no. Diocletian apparently believed that the Alexandrians were using alchemy to create gold and silver and thus finance rebellions against him.
15 posted on 05/06/2021 8:21:22 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Right, he became kind of an unofficial “Doge” of the Florentine republic for a while, not the pope.


16 posted on 05/06/2021 8:38:14 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Well then that must have been some docudrama I was remembering - you were right. Not reading the rest is just shows your lack of respect. Ashame, because you were so wrong blaming Diocletian when he was just one in a long line of manuscript burners in Antiquity; and letting the Muslims off the hook is just a huge distortion of reality.


17 posted on 05/06/2021 8:53:15 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Diocletian was the Facebook and Twitter Google and Apple of his time.


18 posted on 05/06/2021 9:01:42 AM PDT by minnesota_bound (I need more money. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF
Diocletian when he was just one in a long line of manuscript burners in Antiquity.

Go ahead. Name a few others for me from antiquity, and provide documentation. Psychos from the Middle Ages like Savanarola don't count.

And the point of the post wasn't to signal that Diocletian was somehow unique. It was to refute the notion that Christianity was responsible for the destruction of Classical scientific knowledge, such as it existed at all.
19 posted on 05/06/2021 9:03:54 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
Diocletian was the Facebook and Twitter Google and Apple of his time.

I'll agree. They learned a lot form him.
20 posted on 05/06/2021 9:04:28 AM PDT by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson