Posted on 04/29/2021 2:01:06 PM PDT by BenLurkin
State Rep. Alma Hernandez of Tucson said in a press release Wednesday that she was fully vaccinated 11 weeks ago, still wore a mask when out and practiced social distancing and good hygiene but had become ill with the coronavirus anyway.
(Excerpt) Read more at ktar.com ...
But you donโt have a problem injecting everyone with this crap with minimal testing under a EAU.
Yeah, mice are not people. Continue testing and figure it out before injecting another 60m. Contemptible and repugnant.
Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials with tens of thousands of people is not “minimal testing”.
The first recipients of the COVID-19 vaccines got their doses March 16, 2020, well over a year ago. They were tested before the EUA was issued. President Trump confirmed this personally to the entire world in his announcement.
with all of his stats he spews and all of the time he spends here every day pushing the vaccine, along with his refusal to answer my question 2aProtectsTheRest shouldn’t be trusted...
Hold it right there Bub. You're displaying blatant vaccine hesitancy. I would not want to be you!!
Where did you get your marketing degree?
Make sure your kids and grandchildren are vaccinated.
When did it become necessary to have a marketing degree in order to post basic factual information?
The Trump vaccines are the solution to the Chinese virus problem.
So much for the “vaccine” and immunization !!
Hopefully all the sheep have issues !!
LOL. But make sure you have random crap injected into your body. You might get really sick but there's a chance you won't die. Risk/Reward don't you know.
why should anyone believe anything that the cdc says about a so called “deadly virus” when they’re part of our feral government that opened the border, invited, and continues to distribute thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a “global pandemic”???...
The Trump vaccines are the solution to the Chinese virus problem.
Don't sell yourself short. I'm sure your appreciated at work. You got the shilling to the rubes short straw.
The Vaccine was NOT intended to stop you from being infected with the Fauci Flu, it was to intended to lessen the symptoms.
โโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโ
I would like to find a vaccine to lessen the symptoms of fear porn produced from almost every walk of life.
So sick of this covid b.s.
I am, only because Iโve been feeling better than ever since Iโve been taking all that you mentioned and (a couple more). We also take selenium and turmeric, plus a multi vitamin with omega-3s. Even my seasonal environmental allergies arenโt as prominent as in the past.
The Vaccine was NOT intended to stop you from being infected with the Fauci Flu, it was to intended to lessen the symptoms.
___________________________________
What it means is you then become a spreader of the virus to others, both those who got the injection and those who did not. That’s just great and you may not even know you are doing it.
*** Virus gonna virus.***
You would think that these people who wear masks religiously would begin to catch on that masks donโt protect anyone. Yet, they wonโt, because the MSM, CDC, and Dr. Fraudci havenโt told them yet.
Virus gonna virus.
_______________________
Virus gonna do what it does best - replicate until injections no longer are effective.
The vaccine doesn’t make you immune. It only hides the symptoms
What case not to be vaccinated: 95% effective at preventing disease (1/20 will still get sick). 0% chance of severe disease?
Sounds like a great argument to get vaccinated.
....
I thought the “experts” said these vaccines were not intended to prevent covid, but rather to minimize the symptoms?
I thought Fauci said a week or so ago that these vaccines wouldn’t be effective against all the scary Covid-19 variants?
Sorry, but we’re getting different stories every week on these vaccines, and stories that people who’ve received the vaccine still getting covid. I have no plans to get this vaccine, and it appears a growing number of Americans are also coming to this same conclusion.
If people want to get it, that’s cool.
I’ve always wondered what “95% effective” means, it doesn’t sound scientific. I finally found the following explanation from an excerpt from a book by Sucharit Bhakdi and Karina Reiss, “Corona Unmasked.”
...”among the 40,000+ test subjects of the Biontech/Pfizer study (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577?query=featured_home), just 170 COVID-19 โcasesโ occurred (about 0.4%). Of these, 8 occurred among the vaccinated (1x severe), whereas 162 in the unvaccinated control group. The 8 cases in the first group equal 5% of the 162 in the second โ therefore, 95% protection!?
“Considering this small number of cases overall, the evidence must be described as plainly ridiculous from a scientific point of view. Moreover, how did this study define a โCOVID-19 caseโ in the first place? Symptoms like cough, cold, hoarseness and a positive RT-PCR test, which is extremely unreliable, as everyone knows by now. So, what we have here is a vaccination that might possibly prevent cough, cold, hoarseness in 0.7% of the vaccinated....”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.