Posted on 04/06/2021 10:21:49 AM PDT by yelostar
November 2020
Israelis celebrated on Friday when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the country had signed a deal with Pfizer Inc. to buy its novel coronavirus vaccine. But the fact remains that if Pfizer succeeds – or Moderna, with whom Israel also has a contract – these will be the first-ever messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines brought to market for human patients.
In order to receive Food and Drug Administration approval, the companies will have to prove there are no immediate or short-term negative health effects from taking the vaccines. But when the world begins inoculating itself with these completely new and revolutionary vaccines, it will know virtually nothing about their long-term effects.
“There is a race to get the public vaccinated, so we are willing to take more risks,” Tal Brosh, head of the Infectious Disease Unit at Samson Assuta Ashdod Hospital, told The Jerusalem Post.
But he acknowledged that there are unique and unknown risks to messenger RNA vaccines, including local and systemic inflammatory responses that could lead to autoimmune conditions.
An article published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a division of the National Institutes of Health, said other risks include the bio-distribution and persistence of the induced immunogen expression; possible development of auto-reactive antibodies; and toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Imagine if you will, a future in which all humanity has taken the devil's jab, and then the FDA denies approval.
I'm not seeing that future in my crystal ball.
Yet the world is getting stranger and stranger. The Great Reset, Transhumanism, herd immunity - are phrases I could do without hearing ever again. Herd immunity - is offensive. Especially since we know that there are people in the upper atmosphere of society who look upon the mass of humanity as exactly that - a herd.
1. a group of domestic animals assembled or herded together
2. the body of the community as contrasted with the elite
There's an article online that can be found by doing a search on Dr. Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer). He says that "massive-scale depopulation" is the goal of the vaccines. A lot of different sites picked up the article, but I think it's origin is the website: americasfrontlinedoctors.com (not a link)
Anyone can read the article and decide for themselves. Even if you don't agree with his opinion, this article, as do many others, brings forth a lot of critical unanswered questions about the "vaccines." (and maybe he should get a food taster...)
For your info/consideration:https://healthimpactnews.com/ April 6 2021
Health Impact News.com
America under siege! A beacon of light, exposing the truth in the darkness of deceit
But the body needs the booster 3-4 weeks later to increase the immunity pronto!
The ppl who got jabbed, will get jabbed again, and maybe even again! Oh, and while wearing a mask.
That’s exactly what I’m referring to.
And who are the people more afraid of dying and more willing to bootlick just to ‘live’?
They’ll also be all for anal swabbing and any other heinous technique so they can ‘live’ longer.
And not only will they wear a mask while doing so, they’ll sleep wearing one and drive a car alone wearing one.
Never thought of chips and smokes. Sounds awesome while binge watching big pharma info commercials.
Agreed. Vaccines against those diseases make sense. Vaccines for Covid for high risk people make sense. Blanket vaccine for it does not. Healthy people under 50 or 45 do not need to be vaccinated with an EUA new therapy. Common sense is being violated. My 2 cents.
While you’re at it, can you elucidate the process of reverse transcription?
Point taken. I just want balance in the discussion. I don’t think any option is perfect. (Getting Covid or getting vaxxed.) But i agree that I as a young person need not rush for the latter.
It’s unfortunate that in our own country, treatment options while not limited — are kept quiet or censored.
Censorship and science are a very toxic mix—that alone is enough to convince me to stay away from any vaccine.
Yes, except for AAV (Adeno-associated virus) which has a unique ITR (inverted terminal repeat) structure at the ends of the DNA that facilitate extrachromosomal survival of the DNA.
You're right. I'm just saying that condemning all vaccines is a bit like condemning all dogs because one or some of them will bite you.
I don’t disagree.
Fair enough; but the relevance of the reverse transcriptase is to provide a putative mechanism for instructions from mRNA to make it into the genome, under specific circumstances.
Whether it happens in conjunction with the jab, I don’t know; but to assert the possibility is not indicative merely of abysmal ignorance which conflates DNA with RNA or supposes them to be freely interchangeable.
By the same token, trusting everything which is “called” a vaccine is the same as trusting the neighborhood gang-banger’s Pit Bull just because your next-door-neighbor’s Beagle has soulful eyes.
Now I know you’re either amn idiot or utterly dishonest.
The first article talked about transitory effects on the expression of genes, that is, their synthesis of proteins, based on RNA moieties temporarily changing the local conformation of a particular DNA segment.
Your article deboonks the strawman argument that RNA itself mixes with DNA permanently changing the sequence of codons.
OK, so they’re doctors talking down to the general public as they see it. But that’s no excuse.
Two utterly different things.
Sod off.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.