Now I know you’re either amn idiot or utterly dishonest.
The first article talked about transitory effects on the expression of genes, that is, their synthesis of proteins, based on RNA moieties temporarily changing the local conformation of a particular DNA segment.
Your article deboonks the strawman argument that RNA itself mixes with DNA permanently changing the sequence of codons.
OK, so they’re doctors talking down to the general public as they see it. But that’s no excuse.
Two utterly different things.
Sod off.
This argument is based on central dogma of genetics where RNA can't make DNA. DNA can only make DNA through transcription. Think of a zipper where the DNA unzips and then forms a new copy. This is true it takes an enzyme to for the protein synthesis to take place from RNA to the DNA. Then the DNA can produce other DNA using the central dogma of genetics. This process is called reverse transcription.
What you're doing is us not recognizing that the central dogma has been modified since reverse transcription was discovered. Central dogma of genetics is still true if no enzymes are used to create the protein synthesis. This is being highly deceptive or completely unaware of the new modifications to genetics
If that isn't enough lets use the words from moderna
"we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the "program” or “app” is our mRNA drug - the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein"
https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development
Why do you spread miss information?