Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Age-dependent immune response to the Biontech/Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination
MedRxiv ^ | March 3, 2021 | Lisa Müller, et al

Posted on 03/08/2021 3:59:27 PM PST by Cathi

"After the second vaccination, 31.3 % of the elderly had no detectable neutralizing antibodies in contrast to the younger group, in which only 2.2% had no detectable neutralizing antibodies."

Conclusion Our data suggests that lower frequencies of neutralizing antibodies after BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly population may require earlier revaccination to ensure strong immunity and protection against infection."

(Excerpt) Read more at medrxiv.org ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: covidvaccine; donottakeit; elderly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2021 3:59:27 PM PST by Cathi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cathi

in baby’s English please


2 posted on 03/08/2021 4:04:00 PM PST by CondoleezzaProtege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Correct me if I am wrong, but this sounds a lot like saying “Not as effective in the older population”.


3 posted on 03/08/2021 4:06:20 PM PST by taxcontrol (You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

And more is needed which in my opinion, translates into more $$$$ for the pharmas.

Darn, people need to be taught that Vitamin D3, Zinc and Magnesium will help tremendously.


4 posted on 03/08/2021 4:08:11 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

The efficacy of the vaccine is age dependent. Younger people will have stronger, longer lasting protection. The elderly (in this case people over 80) will have weaker, shorter lasting protection and will need to be revaccinated more frequently according to this study.


5 posted on 03/08/2021 4:09:06 PM PST by Cathi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

“in baby’s English please”

Remember the two doses for Pfizer or Moderna?

If you’re elderly...make that three doses, or four, or five. After all, they ARE experimental vaccines.


6 posted on 03/08/2021 4:10:38 PM PST by moovova (Yo GOP....we won't forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
51m
JUST A REMINDER THAT NO HEALTH AUTHORITY - NOT IN ENGLAND, NOT IN SCOTLAND, NOT ISRAEL - HAS SEEN FIT TO PUBLISH NUMBERS OF ALL-CAUSE HOSPITALIZATIONS OR DEATHS IN A POST-VACCINATED POPULATION.

Gee, I wonder why.
8
227
704

Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
59m
4/ Again, some protection is better than none, and the over-80s reported fewer side effects. So the cost-benefit still suggests they should take it. But this is another nail in the umm coffin of the theory the vaccines are magically going to end the epidemic.
20
24
133
Show this thread

Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
1h
3/ And why a fair number of vaccinated people are still getting sick and dying. As with the flu vaccine, Come-here-naughty works great except for the people who really need it. Link:
Age-dependent immune response to the Biontech/Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination
medrxiv.org
2
28
112
Show this thread

Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
1h
2/ Compared to only 2% of the younger group. And 17 days after 1 dose, only 1% of the older group (and 16% of the younger) had neutralizing antibodies.

This is the cell-level answer to the question of why Israel reported few gains into February. One dose is nearly useless...
8
32
130
Show this thread

Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
1h
1/ Wow. This is the paper I’ve been waiting for. German researchers examined how well the
@pfizer
vaccine worked in people over 80 compared to under 60.

The answer: not well at all. 17 days after the second dose - peak protection - 1/3 had NO neutralizing antibodies...


7 posted on 03/08/2021 4:10:49 PM PST by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

Also This: “This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.”


8 posted on 03/08/2021 4:11:56 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: moovova

👍🏻👍🏻

But, but....they can safely gather, maskless, with other experimentally “vax’d” elderly peeps.


9 posted on 03/08/2021 4:13:13 PM PST by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

No it does not exactly mean “The efficacy of the vaccine is age dependent ... and will have to be revaccinated more frequently”

it means that in 1/3 of people over 80 this specific “vaccine” is not effective.

I think it means that they should wait until there are studies of other “vaccines” before making a choice and assuming they are protected.


10 posted on 03/08/2021 4:14:31 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

Spot on.


11 posted on 03/08/2021 4:14:41 PM PST by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
That's what it's saying. And that's a hell of a difference.

I think they have to test seniors who actually had Covid and see what their antibodies are at.

12 posted on 03/08/2021 4:14:52 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Also This: “This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.”
*****************************************************
Party pooper! ;-)


13 posted on 03/08/2021 4:15:11 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Yes


14 posted on 03/08/2021 4:16:24 PM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

This is common to most vaccines in elderly people. Once you pass 80 your immune system no longer behaves like it did when you were younger.


15 posted on 03/08/2021 4:17:28 PM PST by 43north (Its hard to stop a man when he knows he's right and he keeps on comin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

Please, speak as you might to a young child, or a golden retriever ...


16 posted on 03/08/2021 4:19:16 PM PST by Chode (Ashli Babbitt - #SayHerNAME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

That’s why normal clinical trials take years, through many phases, and require a balance of demographics and often proof of superiority or non-inferiority to existing treatments (vaccines a little different). These things were developed in weeks and tested and approved in months and compared against nothing (no treatments have been approved, some explicitly withdrawn or frowned upon leaving 20 million Americans without a treatment option). We’re bound to find out a lot more in time.


17 posted on 03/08/2021 4:21:40 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

This is going well.


18 posted on 03/08/2021 4:24:32 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi

So much for efficacy.


19 posted on 03/08/2021 4:26:34 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

No, people need to “be taught” that this virus is not that big a deal.


20 posted on 03/08/2021 4:29:32 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs. I )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson