Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Supreme Court Goes Full Nicaragua in PA Election Case
American Thinker ^ | 23 Feb, 2021 | C. Edmund Wright

Posted on 02/23/2021 4:16:48 AM PST by MtnClimber

Our Supreme Court is now part of the Washington Swamp, and the Washington Swamp is now totally divorced from any understanding of or caring about the rest of the nation.

For a couple of years, my wife and I escaped Obama’s America by owning a Pacific Ocean hotel in San Juan del Sur, Nicaragua. The irony was that in supposedly socialist Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega's government left us alone far more than government did in the supposedly free country of the United States of Obama.

Still, while Ortega 2.0 might have shed most of his socialism, he had not shed his lust for power, and the job of making sure he never lost again was that of the Chief Justice Roberto Rivas Reyes of what is in effect the Nicaraguan Supreme Court. I’m not sure who was actually more powerful or corrupt -- President Ortega or Justice Rivas -- but Rivas’s was bigger. His motorcade, that is, and he owned the two biggest homes on the two most elevated lots in San Juan del Sur, the nation’s top coastal town, a few hundred yards from our hotel.

Today I’m not sure whose court is more corrupt vis-a-vis election law: Nicaragua’s court or our Supreme Court. It appears that Donald Trump has remade the U.S. Supreme Court -- in Mitt Romney’s image! (I am not blaming Trump, just stating the obvious.)

While I think the United States Supreme Court stumbled badly in its 7-2 rejection of the Texas case on standing last year, the refusal to “grant cert” (i.e., to take the case) yesterday in a Pennsylvania case is horrifying beyond words. I could say that our election laws are now full-on banana republic, but I’d hate to insult bananas that badly.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: communism; insurrection
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: NittanyLion
You're not wrong about that. See Post #11.

The story of the 2020 election was the utter failure of the state legislatures in all of these contested states to rectify blatant violations of their own election laws.

21 posted on 02/23/2021 5:07:57 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Democrats threatening the court with irrelevancy by packing it didn’t help either.


22 posted on 02/23/2021 5:13:10 AM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

True that Alberta, it was the PA legislature that should have stepped in when the PA Supreme Court made its unconstitutional ruling. They did not. The US S Ct set it up to make the case moot, there is no constitutional remedy now that Buyden is in, and to craft one would bring in additional constitutional questions, great instability in this country and into the world beyond what either of us could imagine.

That said, is any voter in PA entitled to have his sacred right to vote protected when his own givernment acts in an unconstitutional manner, when there is a federal interest at stake? Tell me where a PA voter, or a candidate for federal office is to go when their constitutional rights are trampled by its state government?

That left Congress in certifying the election, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Had the tables been turned with these exact facts, you can bet (1) a demonkkkrap PA legislature would have fixed it, or if it did not (2) the demonkkkraps in Congress would have fixed it with Mitt’s, Collins’ and a few other GOP helpers. And don’t fool yourself, the Supreme Court would have stepped in too, in November, and not wait until February after Trump was sworn in again. All the leftists on the court would have joined up with Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch to make sure of that. A reading of Machiavelli explains why the institutions did not take action (like they were going to risk having another 4 years of Trump).

A fake fortune teller could have predicted this outcome looking into a black Brunswick bowling ball. The Supreme Court purposely avoided the issue and then ran out the clock. Alito wrote an opinion on October 28th (PA Republicans v Bockvar) “It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the constitutionality of the [PA Court’s] decision before the election. That question has national importance, and there is a strong liklihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution.”

The Supreme Court, a political body, has a long history of bad decisions that have actually cost people their lives and freedoms. Add this one to the list.


23 posted on 02/23/2021 5:16:33 AM PST by Susquehanna Patriot ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

“I could say that our election laws are now full-on banana republic, but I’d hate to insult bananas that badly.”

Yes, it is embarrassing that the U.S. Supreme Court will not even consider cases of rampant election fraud. I suppose the “justices” see what is happening to citizens who are being “canceled” and don’t want to take the risks.


24 posted on 02/23/2021 5:17:36 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (Election Fraud Deniers--Won't follow the science, won't follow the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

PA had election laws on the books that they did not follow.


25 posted on 02/23/2021 5:19:27 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Mark Levin was furious about this yesterday.


26 posted on 02/23/2021 5:21:14 AM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
PA went to the USSC THREE times - once before the election, denied, once after the election, denied and this time.

The legislature provided their own slate of electors (that Pence ignored).

The Secretary of State of PA (since resigned) changed the rules, the state Attorney General (Josh Shapiro) took it to the PA Supreme Court (5 D's, 2 R's, who, of course, ruled 5-2) that the "law" was fine. That is how the "law" was changed.

Now, how could it have easily been rectified by the state legislature?

27 posted on 02/23/2021 5:21:33 AM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot
I believe Christine Blasey Ford.

While I dismissed her allegations at the time of confirmation, after yesterday, I have no doubt that Kavanaugh is perfectly capable of giving into peer pressure and participating in a gang bang.

28 posted on 02/23/2021 5:22:15 AM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Good but sad article. Our country is finished.


29 posted on 02/23/2021 5:22:28 AM PST by tennmountainman ( Liberals Are Baby Killers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot

COWARDS ALL!!!!


30 posted on 02/23/2021 5:22:44 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Abby4116
The legislature provided their own slate of electors (that Pence ignored).

This is 100% false. The PA legislature did no such thing.

31 posted on 02/23/2021 5:22:49 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("And once in a night I dreamed you were there; I canceled my flight from going nowhere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot
“Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you,”

IMHO, the intelligence community is now running this banana republic, not president *.

32 posted on 02/23/2021 5:29:01 AM PST by eeriegeno (A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The so called conservatives are allegedly in the majority 5-3, what does that tell you? Trump appointed three empty suits, cowardly liars all.


33 posted on 02/23/2021 5:32:07 AM PST by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

While I am not at the point to go that far, I am willing to move in the direction that the Ford issue softened him up - seeking approval from the left and media as needed, or at least buy some political protection.


34 posted on 02/23/2021 5:39:01 AM PST by Susquehanna Patriot ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The Supreme Court has ONE job; focus on the Constitution.

They have failed to do that.

Impeachment as soon as possible is the only Constitutional remedy.


35 posted on 02/23/2021 5:39:39 AM PST by jdsteel ("A Republic, Madam, if you can keep it." Sorry Ben, looks like we blew it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno

Great additional point as to Schumer that may figure into some of the actions and inaction on selected cases by the justices.


36 posted on 02/23/2021 5:41:04 AM PST by Susquehanna Patriot ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Lawyer Robert Barnes, who I’ve been following the last year, says one major problem was nominating “conservative” judges all promoted by the Federalist Society. They will all turn out to be “swamp creatures.”

Am trying to figure out what is exactly wrong with the Federalist Society.


37 posted on 02/23/2021 5:44:46 AM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

ACB is indeed a coward. Sure she fears for what threats to her family would come if she allowed for a full blown hearing on election fraud, but patriots who fought for America’s independence faced the same threats.
I always thought there was something off about her when she was being considered for the USSC. Trump’s nominee vetters did him no favors.


38 posted on 02/23/2021 5:46:26 AM PST by SimpleJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Agree 100%. Our Potemkin economy is a fragile husk ready to blow away with the slightest breeze.

If you have faith, Trust in the Lord is all that remains. If not, it’s growing darker by the day.


39 posted on 02/23/2021 5:48:49 AM PST by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Susquehanna Patriot
"While I am not at the point to go that far, I am willing to move in the direction that the Ford issue softened him up - seeking approval from the left and media as needed, or at least buy some political protection."

During the vicious onslaught against Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump, in concert with his entire coalition of ardent supporters and voters gave Kavanaugh as much political protection, benefit of the doubt and good faith as any figure in American politics has ever received.

If Kavanaugh is now seeking protection or good graces from the very same left and media that were hell bent on destroying him by turning on those that supported him, his character is even more despicable than the allegations against him made him out to be.

40 posted on 02/23/2021 5:50:57 AM PST by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson