20+ states (red) seek to sue four battleground states (blue) Posted on 12/10/2020 3:44:35 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Since Texas filed the suit, over 20 states have joined or expressed an interest in joining. As it now stands, the following states are seeking a Supreme Court remedy to the November 3 election: Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio, West Virginia, and Florida.20+ states (red) seek to sue four battleground states (blue)
Late last night in Idaho, the Republican Party overruled the state’s Attorney General, also a Republican, to file an amicus brief seeking to participate in the lawsuit, as Media Right News reported.
Wyoming announced its likely participation in the lawsuit this morning, with the state’s lawmakers sending a letter to the governor that requests the state’s Attorney General to participate in the lawsuit.
Lawmakers in Wyoming have indicated their official participation is forthcoming, with Wyoming Sen. Bo Biteman writing “The Governor responded to my email within minutes and has asked the Attorney General to look into the matter. Stay tuned!”
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalfile.com ...
Yeah, but the States arguing against it are asking the Court not to get involved.
Point being that if the states in question win, all you will get from the Supreme Court is another one liner:
“We decline to hear the case.”
And in tiny print under that, imperceptible to the human eye will be the words:
“Have we behaved enough for you not to stack the court? Will you please leave us alone. We promise to be good.”
Ohio AG Yost is not doing himself any favors by trying to thread the needle. Trump won Ohio by over 8 points!!
If I lived in Ohio I would be LIVID...go get your AG on board OHIO!!!!!!!!
Praise you, Lord God Almighty.
Still reminding me of the early chapters in History of the Civil War books. States and territories lining up against each other on opposite sides.
Dems think this is where we will just give up, shrug and say “welcome President Elect Biden” and “better luck next century” when there’s an honest election with honest vote counting someday.
BS
Iowa has a dem 77 year-old AG Tom Miller and doesn’t like Trump. Says he doesn’t have any evidence. So there’s that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
AMEN!!!! Praises all go to our Lord of Lord and KING of KINGS!!!
Merry CHRISTmas Savior !!
There is a difference between signing on as a plantiff, and filing a amicus curiae brief in support of one side of a case. As far as I know, Texas is the plantiff and the other states are just filing in support of Texas.
Iowa should be on that list.
Should as in the list is inaccurate, or should as Iowa should get itself in gear?
I don’t really understand why this took a month and a week to get to this point… But I guess I’m glad we are here
I am thinking timing, I believe the elections in those states needed to be certified, once that was done, it was an illegal act because those elections didn’t follow the law.
I believe this lawsuit is our only REAL chance
The fraud is very technical and will require years of investigations, hearings, etc to get figured out and you will need a law enforcement agency on board as well or it all means nothing. I stated early on that wasn’t going to work
You have a point..but Biden, the placeholder, would be too old then.
This guy, who is asking for a pardon, is releasing more info about Judge Sullivan and saying he was in on the heist..
https://twitter.com/Johnheretohelp/status/1333826161844105216
Most Democrats do not believe there was any cheating. Even if you rub their nose on it they just deny it happened.
No, some are actually intervening.
My gov and AG in Idaho have to test the wind direction first, but in order to do that, they have to pull their head out of the ass.
Really? Which states are no plantiffs with Texas?
I'm not a lawyer, but bill them by the hour. I'm not certain if a private individual might join the case, but do keep in mind, at least part of the rational of this being filed by Texas is that Constitutionally, disputes between the states go directly to the SCOTUS, so there are no lower district or appellate court filings, appeals, etc. A case between states goes directly to SCOTUS. No individual enjoys this privilege, although I would think that would not necessarily exclude and individual from joining (especially provided they were not a citizen of one of the states that has already joined).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.