Posted on 11/13/2020 5:38:32 PM PST by weston
I haven’t seen her yet, Spunky. I have a few things left to watch. Boy, it never stops, does it? Thanks for your kind post.
I'm good now.
...
THUDD!
I don’t know which part I like best.....visiting w/all of you.....the SLIMMING pool....or....Jeeves.
Okay.....I’ve decided.....visiting w/all of you.....SLIMMING pools come and go, and, well, Jeeves is probaby a real player.
Lol you’re funny...stop looking at him! Try.
Oh pax....
You’re going to have to remove that pic. We’re losing our gals! Maybe you’d better post a pic of Biden...that’ll bring them back to earth.
I looked up why appoint a Special Council. This article is back before Ken Star was appointed.
Here is ONE reason. Read the rest of the article at the link for more.
“The regulations eliminate the detailed time and other constraints which the Act imposed on the Attorney General’s screening of allegations. Nevertheless, the Attorney General’s order prudently states that immediate appointment of a special counsel at times may be warranted. “There are occasions,” it comments (64 Fed. Reg. 37038), “when the facts create a conflict so substantial, or the exigencies of the situation are such that any initial investigation might taint the subsequent investigation, so that it is appropriate for the Attorney General to immediately appoint a Special Counsel.”
The regulations eliminate the detailed time and other constraints which the Act imposed on the Attorney General’s screening of allegations. Nevertheless, the Attorney General’s order prudently states that immediate appointment of a special counsel at times may be warranted. “There are occasions,” it comments (64 Fed. Reg. 37038), “when the facts create a conflict so substantial, or the exigencies of the situation are such that any initial investigation might taint the subsequent investigation, so that it is appropriate for the Attorney General to immediately appoint a Special Counsel.”
https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/attorney-generals-special-counsel-regulations/
KEEP PRAYING. We don’t need this man in the White House.
Praying....and, administering eye bleach!!
https://www.joemygod.com/2020/09/cruz-bush-v-gore-is-big-reason-to...
Sep 20, 2020 · Sen. Ted Cruz writes for Fox News:. Twenty years ago, I was part of the legal team that litigated Bush v.Gore and went to the Supreme Court. For thirty-six days, the country did not know who the president was going to be, and if we had had a four …
Also on that team were Justices ACB, Kavanaugh? CH J Roberts
Sitting on SCOTUS a were Thomas, Alito
Although other senators may take a similar stand,
They are colleagues. That is significant
https://twitter.com/RealMFlynnJr/status/1333916256571953152
Michael Flynn Jr
@RealMFlynnJr
·
1h
YEP!!!
Quote Tweet
Emerald Robinson
@EmeraldRobinson
· 1h
A military intel analyst from 305th pops up in exhibit 105. Name redacted.
A 2nd military intel analyst from DIA/NSA pops up in exhibit 109.
A 3rd military intel analyst pops up in PA & AZ hearings to testify on Dominion.
See a pattern? What are the odds?
I’ll still go THUD but I won’t enjoy it!
I see a pattern....and, that retweet is a BOOM 💥, coming from Flynn!
Interesting footnote.
Page 7
3 The Court notes that proposed amici curiae Christine Todd Whitman, John Danforth,
Lowell Weicker, Constance Morella, Christopher Shays, Carter Phillips, Stuart Gerson, Donald
Ayer, John Bellinger III, Edward J. Larson, Michael Stokes Paulsen, Alan Charles Raul, Paul
Rosenzweig, Robert Shanks, Stanley Twardy, Keith E. Whittington, and Richard Bernstein
(Proposed Amici Curiae), have filed an Application for Leave to File Amicus Brief in opposition
to Petitioners’ Motion (Application). Proposed Amici Curiae have attached a brief in opposition
to Petitioners’ Motion as Exhibit 1 to their Application.
I agree with this. He said “To date”, he has not seen evidence. Has he been legally presented with sworn evidence? So far it has mostly been hearings, but not evidence in front of him or any judge. I am thinking a play on words. At least, I am hoping.
CNN is trying to get James O'Keefe arrested for being a real journalist. #CNNTapes https://t.co/qMZCswsYWy— Mark Dice (@MarkDice) December 1, 2020
Legal experts say this may be a felony. We‘ve referred it to law enforcement.— CNN Communications (@CNNPR) December 1, 2020
Why are these people....especially Christine Todd Whitman.....friends of the court??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.