You fat liar,listen man,I'll take you back back behind the barn and show you some one handed pushups!
I'm one tough hombre, I was born on a pirate ship!
Posted on 10/12/2020 11:54:39 AM PDT by V K Lee
True metrics out here point to nothing less than a MASSIVE TRUMP VICTORY!
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
LOL - you're right - and I love the term 'Hiden snoozinar'...that's inspired...
Think what she would be like if she was the most powerful person in the world and - - she didn't like YOUR attitude...
In light of recent information, the DNC and others worked to undermind our newly and duly elected president and administration; the following is certainly arguable. That being the prior restraint of published surveys/polling is justified under the landmark decision in Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697, 51 S. Ct. 625, 75 L. Ed. 1357 (1931).
In that decision, the Court identified three types of publications against which a prior restraint might be valid: those that pose a threat to national security, those that contain obscene materials, and those that advocate violence or the overthrow of the government.
In these fake polling numbers, we see the DNC, and those working with the Democrats, continuing the effort to overthrow the wishes of a majority of the country by every hook and crook imaginable. In the case by push-polling voters.
Under these circumstances, I, for one, contend publishing presidential election polling data be suspended until the winner of this election is determined. Secondarily, this fakery WILL inflame the radical left (i.e., advocating/promoting violence as mentioned in the decision above) if Biden isn't declared the victor.
Just my 2 cents, FWIW.
You fat liar,listen man,I'll take you back back behind the barn and show you some one handed pushups!
I'm one tough hombre, I was born on a pirate ship!
Pentagon Papers case also noted that prior restraint was justified in some cases, but came down on the side of “if something is published that is a crime to publish, the government can prosecute” - and that possibility was decided to be deterrent enough, without a need for court order.
The stretch you are making is that publishing a poll is a crime, if the poll is deliberately false somehow.
Also, there is a detail omitted in your summary of Near v. Minnesota. “The security of the community life may be protected against incitements to acts of violence and the overthrow **—> by force <—** of orderly government.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/283/697
Overthrow without use of force is not a crime. Overthrow with lies is not a crime. Our government has been crapping on the constitution for close to 100 years (see commerce clause abuse, for one), and we have people who are openly communist running for and taking elective office. Lies by the government are more common than truth from the government. Courts are literally hallucinatory bodies, seeing things like abortion and homo marriage in the constitution. Congress endorsed a dual citizen to be president, and never debated the question of “is a dual citizen at birth a natural born citizen?”
Don’t look to a corrupt government to correct itself. A few fall guys, a slow down in the march to Plantation America.
I’m pissed beyond words with the whole thing. But then, universal suffrage is what makes this sort of lying to the public into an effective tool. The government is lying to a public that is largely ignorant, lazy, and we’re all looking to get something for nothing.
Nice swapping ideas with you. Thanks!
Sure and we've all heard many times that PDJT just has to win by that much bigger margin so that he beats the legit Dem votes PLUS the fraud... ... however, I think that this just means that the more the Dems know that PDJT is ahead of them, the bigger the fraud is that they will commit. We might actually see more ballots 'cast' than there are legit voters! Or alternatively, there are going to be endless PDJT ballots headed for landfill sites never to be part of the general count.
That's a keeper!
Pretty amazing the following Dr. Steve Turley is getting with his videos. 748,000 YouTube views by the day after the video is posted!
Turley is a great simplifier. He know how to deliver the kind of compressed information the average conservative voter is looking to digest.
And Dole falling off a campaign stage made things go from bad to worse.......
they’ll all show up when it counts...nov 4th
What are they doing with all the $$$$ being donated to the campaign?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
networks, pollsters & fund raisers get their cut
CF gets her cut
“hunter” gets his cut
I believe you are correct about the Dem operatives going around and stealing Trump signs. They left my Gerry Griffin(state Rep)sign alone.
However, the prosecution of theft of political signs is actually up to your local chief of police and town prosecutor. I actually know both of them. I believe IF I could catch the person and they could be identified that I would press charges. The chief of police would swear out a warrant. Even if it is only a misdemeanor. It all depends on the town you live in I suppose.
I believe you are also correct about the type of person who wants to own one of those old houses in the “village”.
You could not give me one of those old 1700-1800 houses. They are all money pits. My 1972 vintage house is bad enough. Liberal Women & men love to live in the idealic New England village with the white steepled church and houses all packed together. Conservatives want to live farther out in the country where someone is not looking into your backyard. Hence, I live on 12 acres 1 1/2 miles from the center of town.
The downside is that when you keep the Trump sign near the house, not many will see it driving by.
The signs for local Republican candidates are never touched. But at least I know when I see those signs, they are likely Trump voters as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.