Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get real data behind record temperature claims (from a Sandia National Lab scientist)
The Albuquerque Journal ^ | December 30, 2019 | Frederick L. Vook

Posted on 12/31/2019 10:33:27 AM PST by CedarDave

Someone has said “ignorance is not only not knowing something, but also ‘knowing’ something to be true that isn’t.” What I’m about to tell you is just such a thing.

Some time ago, the Albuquerque Journal quoted a long-time resident who claimed to be an expert on “record Albuquerque temperatures” to say, “record-high Albuquerque temperatures are more common in recent years.” The data show this is not true, although widely believed. I have become increasingly disturbed by non-scientists and some scientists quoting scientific results incorrectly.

The data below [omitted from this excerpt] come from the Albuquerque National Weather Service [NWS} morning broadcasts on station WX134 162.4 MHZ. Every morning ... the normal high and low for the day are given, also the record high and low.

This data shows that record-high temperatures occurred over 100 years ago in Albuquerque. That means that, for that date, over 100 attempts to exceed that temperature have failed. They also show that the record-high temperatures are also flat over this long period. The record-high temperatures also occur independent of season from April through November. ...

Albuquerque was a quite different city 100 years ago. Smaller population, lower CO2, fewer heat-trapping streets and buildings. All those changes would tend to give higher temperatures in recent years.

What is the explanation? Also record-low temperature data seems to show they tend to be in earlier years as expected.

Perhaps Sandia scientists can find an explanation. Could it be that CO2 or other gases have a saturable heat absorption for high concentrations? Also, these investigations could provide an excellent school project to show children how a scientific investigation is conducted.

(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Local News; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: climatechange; climatechangefraud; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; newmexico
Frederick L. Vook is Director Emeritus, Physical And Chemical Sciences, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque.

Key observation:
I have become increasingly disturbed by non-scientists and some scientists quoting scientific results incorrectly.

Regarding school science projects, he suggests getting the data from the NWS and plotting the data versus each date of the year. Then draw a conclusion and suggest future investigations. This could be done for each city in New Mexico.

1 posted on 12/31/2019 10:33:27 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LegendHasIt; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; CougarGA7; ...

NM list PING!

I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics

To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keyword

To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for FR member use; its use in the News Forum should not be for trivial or inconsequential posts. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)

2 posted on 12/31/2019 10:34:58 AM PST by CedarDave (Public schools are better named "propaganda indoctrination centers." Educate your children at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

3 posted on 12/31/2019 10:47:21 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Lincoln: "The Founders did not make America racist or slaver. They inherited it, that way!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Is there any FReeper who knows enough about physics to give us the run down on Dr. Patrick Frank?


4 posted on 12/31/2019 10:49:05 AM PST by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

He is emeritus, aka “retired” thus is more willing to speak the truth than those whose project funding is dependent on deep staters who are pushing the climate nonsense.


5 posted on 12/31/2019 10:49:12 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Tony Heller is all over this stuff like stink on Schiff.

This channel will keep you busy for weeks:

https://www.youtube.com/user/TonyHeller1

He produces something like three videos a week. He focuses on REAL data and includes a lot of charts and newspaper articles going back over a century. Expose yourself to five or six of his videos and you’ll be a hard core “denier” for life and be able to argue your point effortlessly.


6 posted on 12/31/2019 10:52:33 AM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I like how they keep “correcting” recorded data upward due to supposed “errors and cold bias in the equipment” yet they haven’t replaced the supposed defective equipment.


7 posted on 12/31/2019 10:54:31 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

A bozo weatherman in Austin, TX kept saying every day this past summer was record breaking highs. Strange how this was one of the cooler summers we’ve had. The biggest heat was his lying pants on fire.


8 posted on 12/31/2019 11:39:29 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Dumb@$$ must not have been around in 2011...

THAT was a record challenging summer.


9 posted on 12/31/2019 11:49:35 AM PST by L,TOWM (An upraised middle finger is my virtue signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Bookmark.


10 posted on 12/31/2019 11:58:18 AM PST by Inyo-Mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I find the format of the data list is confusing.
For what date (CCYY) is the RH data and for what date (CCYY) is the NH data???

Is the format attempting to say the RH date is for the ONLY date (CCYY) date shown next to it, and the NH data is for when????


11 posted on 12/31/2019 12:18:41 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/08/the-logarithmic-effect-of-carbon-dioxide/


12 posted on 12/31/2019 1:03:46 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Thanks for the link, I’m subscribing.......Happy New Year buddy!


13 posted on 12/31/2019 1:06:18 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Apparently was never hot or cold before records. Weird huh?


14 posted on 12/31/2019 1:09:26 PM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

“Albuquerque was a quite different city 100 years ago.” LOL! Hell it was quite a different city when I first moved there in 1963. So, like 57 years ago?


15 posted on 12/31/2019 1:11:27 PM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

A very quick illustration (short enough for leftard sheeple attention span) :

To mention that ‘historical’ temperatures (usually quoted) being mostly in town/city centers where there is NOW more Concrete and Asphalt covering the location - it is hardly surprising that the temperatures compare higher.

Mention the word ‘Cherrypicking’ about the data presented being a form of fraud.

.


16 posted on 12/31/2019 1:28:52 PM PST by elbook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
For example, for the date of November 23rd, the Record High was 74 in 1909. The Normal High for that date is 52.

Normal highs are determined on a 30-year moving average for the shown date, presently from 1981-2010. Thus 30-year averages for November 23 from 1961 to 1990 and 1971-2000 may be (and likely are) different from the current "normal" high for that date.

https://w2.weather.gov/climate/help/glossary.php

17 posted on 12/31/2019 4:10:20 PM PST by CedarDave (Public schools are better named "propaganda indoctrination centers." Educate your children at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Modern "journalism" is all about deciding which facts the public should NOT know because they might reflect badly on Democrats.

Wow! Thank YOU Grandpa Dave, for re-writing this! I had not heard it before, cherish this statement, and I'll be using it a bunch in the future. Great item to start my new year.

18 posted on 01/01/2020 8:59:28 AM PST by AFPhys ((Liberalism is what Smart looks like to Stupid people - ® - Mia of KC. Rush - 1:50-8/21/15))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Happy New Year old FRiend.

Please use this reality where appropriate.


19 posted on 01/01/2020 9:11:59 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Lincoln: "The Founders did not make America racist or slaver. They inherited it, that way!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson