Key observation:
I have become increasingly disturbed by non-scientists and some scientists quoting scientific results incorrectly.
Regarding school science projects, he suggests getting the data from the NWS and plotting the data versus each date of the year. Then draw a conclusion and suggest future investigations. This could be done for each city in New Mexico.
NM list PING!
I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics
To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keyword
To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for FR member use; its use in the News Forum should not be for trivial or inconsequential posts. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)
Is there any FReeper who knows enough about physics to give us the run down on Dr. Patrick Frank?
He is emeritus, aka “retired” thus is more willing to speak the truth than those whose project funding is dependent on deep staters who are pushing the climate nonsense.
Tony Heller is all over this stuff like stink on Schiff.
This channel will keep you busy for weeks:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TonyHeller1
He produces something like three videos a week. He focuses on REAL data and includes a lot of charts and newspaper articles going back over a century. Expose yourself to five or six of his videos and you’ll be a hard core “denier” for life and be able to argue your point effortlessly.
I like how they keep “correcting” recorded data upward due to supposed “errors and cold bias in the equipment” yet they haven’t replaced the supposed defective equipment.
A bozo weatherman in Austin, TX kept saying every day this past summer was record breaking highs. Strange how this was one of the cooler summers we’ve had. The biggest heat was his lying pants on fire.
I find the format of the data list is confusing.
For what date (CCYY) is the RH data and for what date (CCYY) is the NH data???
Is the format attempting to say the RH date is for the ONLY date (CCYY) date shown next to it, and the NH data is for when????
“Albuquerque was a quite different city 100 years ago.” LOL! Hell it was quite a different city when I first moved there in 1963. So, like 57 years ago?
A very quick illustration (short enough for leftard sheeple attention span) :
To mention that ‘historical’ temperatures (usually quoted) being mostly in town/city centers where there is NOW more Concrete and Asphalt covering the location - it is hardly surprising that the temperatures compare higher.
Mention the word ‘Cherrypicking’ about the data presented being a form of fraud.
.