A Weekly Dose of President Trump - Trump Family Train 12/2/19 to 12/31/19.

FReepers, Cult45, and Deplorables | December 2, 2019 | dollyCali

[DollyCali]

THE WEEKS THAT WERE
THE GOOD, THE BAD
THE UGLY



GOOD ~ POTUS in Afghan for Tgiving!

VERY GOOD ~2 moreRallies to lift our spirits and those of POTUS

BAD ~ Seemingly everyone on Left

UGLY ~Maxine (still)









3 Rallies
more graphics at post One



Welcome all you Deplorables to this week's edition of the Dose!
This is EVERYTHING TRUMP.
Administration, family, frustrations, joys, winning!
We welcome your research, your commentary,
your personal OT sharing and your presence.
Even if you do not share a lot, just check in and say hi.
Lurkers are welcome to become posters!


POTUS and daughter IVANKA in Austin TX APPLE Plant w/CEO Tim Cook 11/20/19





















FLOTUS and Karen Pence visit Red Cross to help assemble “comfort” kits to be sent overseas to Troops(11/21/19)  

 First couple honors recipients (including Jon Voight) at the National Medal of Arts and Humanities Award event 11/3/19

FLOTUS welcomes the official White House tree (11/25/19)





Conan the warrior special forces dog is (cautiously) welcomed at WH by the first couple 11-25-19

   First Family leaves WH for FL 11-26-19

Guess who's coming for dinner?
POTUS suprises troops on Thanksgiving in Afghanastan 11-28-19

  

And back “home” to Fla for Tgiving dinner w/family 11-30-19





Keep the Truth coming Mr. President
Keep on Tweeting!

[CottonBall]

Ping to self to read later

[sissyjane]

Forget the beer and have a scotch, Justice Kavanaugh!!!

[CottonBall]

“If we all report them (they do us) I wonder if they would disappear.”

I’d guess no, seeing that Twitter is liberal. They are only tolerating Trump’s post because of the exponential amount of business they have gotten because of him. And given him no credit for.

[CottonBall]

Lol, I laughed out loud at that one. Scared the dog who was on my lap. I love that, taking half of Bernie’s sign. You find the best pictures!

[CottonBall]

One down....so many to go...

[hoosiermama]

Shared on FB. Lots of cat people there

[CottonBall]

That’s a great letter pointing out the legal deficiencies going on, the lack of due process and rights, and comparing the Nixon and Clinton impeachment to this one.

[CottonBall]

:)

[exit82]

Lots of cloture votes today for judges.

Confirmation votes for 7 judges tomorrow, and a few more on Thursday.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges_appointed_by_Donald_Trump

“As of December 3, 2019, the United States Senate has confirmed 165 Article III judges nominated by President Trump, including 2 Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 48 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, 113 judges for the United States District Courts, and 2 judges for the United States Court of International Trade.[2] There are currently 55 nominations to Article III courts awaiting Senate action, including 4 for the Courts of Appeals, 50 for the District Courts and 1 for the Court of International Trade.[3] There is currently 1 vacancy on the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 86 vacancies on the U.S. District Courts, 2 vacancies on the U.S. Court of International Trade,[3] and 16 announced federal judicial vacancies that will occur before the end of Trump’s first term (3 for the Courts of Appeals and 13 for District Courts).[4] Trump has not made any recess appointments to the federal courts.

In terms of Article I courts, as of November 5, 2019, the Senate has confirmed 13 judges nominated by Trump, including 3 for the United States Court of Federal Claims, 4 for the United States Tax Court, 4 for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 1 for the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and 1 for the United States Court of Military Commission Review. There are currently 13 nominations to Article I courts awaiting Senate action, including 7 for the United States Court of Federal Claims and 4 for the Tax Court and 2 for the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. There are currently 8 vacancies on the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, 2 on the U.S. Tax Court, 0 on the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, 0 on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Services, and 0 on the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review. Trump designated Susan G. Braden and Margaret M. Sweeney as chief judges of the Court of Federal Claims.

In terms of Article IV territorial courts, as of June 12, 2019, Trump has not made any appointments or elevated any judges to the position of chief judge. There is currently 1 nomination to an Article IV court awaiting Senate action.”

[STARLIT]

The White House

Washington

December 1,2019

The Honorable Jerrold Nadler

Chairman

Committee on the Judiciary

United States House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Chairman Nadler:

I write in response to your letter of November 26, 2019, to President Trump regarding the purported "impeachment inquiry" currently being conducted by Democrats in the House of Representatives ("House"). As you know, this baseless and highly partisan inquiry violates all past historical precedent, basic due process rights, and fundamental fairness. Your letter asked that the President notify the House Committee on the Judiciary ("Judiciary Committee" or "Committee") by December 1, 2019, whether the Administration intends to participate in a hearing scheduled for December 4,2019. You scheduled this initial hearing ---no doubt purposely---during the time that you know the President will be out of the country attending the NATO Leaders Meeting in London.

Your letter provides little information about the upcoming hearing. It vaguely indicates that you intend to hold a hearing to discuss the "historical and constitutional basis of impeachment." We understand from rumors and press reports (through not from any notice provided in your letter or in the official notice of the hearing) that the hearing will consist of an academic discussion by law profeffors. We understand this to mean that your initial hearing will include no fact witnesses at all.

You also sent another letter on November 29,2019, setting a different deadline of December 6 for the President to provide notice as to whether the Administration intends to participate in additional, unspecified hearing that apparently will occur, what witnesses will be called, what the schedule will be, what the procedures will be, or what rights, if any, the Committee intends to afford the President. In other words, you have given no information regarding your plans, set arbitrary deadlines, and then demanded a response, all to create the false appearance of providing the President some rudimentary process. In any event, this letter responds onlt to your letter of November 26 and fully reserves the right to respond further when and if you release more information about the December 4 hearing. We will respond separately to your letter of November 29 by your requested deadline of Friday, December 6.

The Honorable Jerrold Nadler

Page 2

As an initial matter, your letter of November 26 only exacerbates the complete lack of due process and fundamental fairness afforded the President throughout this purported impeachment inquiry. Although your letter attempts to invoke precedent from the Clinton impeachment inquiry, you have completely ignored not only the process followed then, but all other historical precedent. For example, when the Judiciary Committee scheduled a similar hearing during the Clinton impeachment process, it allowed these questioning the witnesses two-and-a-half weeks' notice to prepare, and it scheduled the hearing on a date suggested by the President's attorneys. Today, by contrast, you have afforded the President no scheduling input, no meaningful information, and so little time to prepare that you have effectively denied the Administration a fair opportunity to participate. Although the hearing is set to occur in just three days, you still have not disclosed the identities of the witnesses who will appear. Press reports as late as this afternoon indicate that the identities of the witnesses, apparently all academics, have not even been provided to other Democrats on the Judiciary Committee. These reports also indicate that you currently intend to call three academic witnesses, but will allow Republicans to call only one such witness. Worse, while providing no information, you have demanded a response from the President. Your letter does not even attempt to explain the reason for this.

The Committee's unfair process regarding this hearing follows numerous other violations of due process by the House--both before and since the adoption of House Resolution ("H.Res.") 660--including the outright prohibition on participation by the President at any stage in the proceedings before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI"). There, Chairman Schiff attempted to concoct a false narrative through selective citation of the testimony of witnesses of his choosing, after vetting them during closed-door depositions hidden from both the President and the American public. The President was not allowed to present evidence, to call witnesses, to cross examine witnesses, or even to see transcripts until weeks after testimony had been taken, and he was allowed absolutely no participation in the public hearings that followed. Further, witness requests made by Republicans were denied. In addition, certain questioning of the witnesses who did testify was censored by Democrats.

Despite the fundamental unfairness of these hearings, the facts that emerged even from Chairman Schiff's carefully controlled and blatantly unfair process served only to further confirm that the President has done nothing wrong and that there is no basis for continuing your inquiry. Inviting the Administration now to participate in an after-the-fact constitutional law seminar- with yet-to-be named witnesses- only demonstrates further the countless procedural deficiencies that have infected this inquiry from its inception and shows the lack of seriousness with which you are undertaking these proceedings. An academic discussion cannot retroactively fix an irretrievably broken process.

Moreover, your November 26 letter threatens that "{w}hile we invite you to this hearing, we remind you that if you continue to refuse to make witnesses and documents available to the committees of jurisdiction, under H. Res. 660, "the chair shall have the discretion to impose additional remedies.'" And attempt by the judiciary Committee to deny the President procedural rights based on the President's assertion of the longstanding constitutional

Page 3

rights and privileges of the Executive Branch is equivalent to denying the President his procedural rights altogether.

NIKK..sorry for any mistakes..I'm the worst typist in the world. This has taken me over two hours to type. Resting to type the rest...lol

[sweetiepiezer]

Up Nadler’s Butt.

Eric Stinksowell is so excited he is running from his farts, he is so excited.

Thanks for all the hard work NIKK, truly appreciated.

[hoosiermama]

Here’s the house report if anyone is interested

https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/20191203_-_full_report___hpsci_impeachment_inquiry_-_20191203.pdf

[RightGeek]

She forgot Fauxcahontas

With Kamala Harris's departure -- the December debate stage may likely be an all white candidate affair.

You can imagine the DNC is going to hear more complaints like this ... given the historically diverse number of candidates running this year. https://t.co/9xAy4V3SbO— Asma Khalid (@asmamk) December 3, 2019

[Spunky]

Video is no longer there.

Granny I have a question. Why did the parents leave those 3 children in the vehicle, do you know the answer to that?

[exit82]

Chad Pergram

@ChadPergram

· 4m

Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA) is now on the Senate floor delivering his farewell address. Isakson announced over the summer he would retire at the end of the year due to health concerns.

[exit82]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7752119/Kate-Middleton-departs-Buckingham-Palace-help-Queen-Boris-Johnson-host.html

NATO heads are feted at Buckingham Palace reception by the Queen.

Many Getty/AFP images that cannot be posted here.

[exit82]

Partial article:

“Donald and Melania Trump have arrived at Buckingham Palace for a glittering Nato reception hosted by The Queen and attended by The Duchess of Cambridge.

The US President and First Lady earlier this evening had tea with Prince Charles and Camilla at Clarence House before arriving at Buckingham Palace amid heavy security.

The First Lady wore a yellow £4,700 Valentino coat to keep the British cold at bay teamed with fuchsia heels, while the president opted for a dark blue suit, white shirt and blue tie.

The Duchess of Cambridge was spotted departing for the function this evening while the US president enjoys afternoon tea with the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall.

This is while Camilla cut an elegant figure in a red dress and black blazer with Prince Charles wearing a navy pin stripe suit.

Other world leaders at Buckingham Palace tonight include Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his wife Emine and Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel and Prime Minister of the Netherlands Mark Rutte.

The Duchess of Cambridge is expected to play a key part in tonight’s event, as her husband, Prince William today joined a British navy crack team protecting oil tankers against hostile Iranian forces.

Tonight the Queen also wowed in a green dress and accessorised with a emerald green shawl, a pearl necklace and pearl earrings. She seemed in good spirits following rumours from cruel social media trolls who had speculated her death.”

[exit82]

[exit82]

[exit82]

Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
·
3m
Adam Schiff released his impeachment report today

He’s trying to remove the president for “intimidating witnesses”

But how could he intimidate witnesses if no one who testified before Adam Schiff’s committee actually witnessed anything?