Posted on 09/28/2019 10:43:12 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2
Trump will be impeached in the house. Senate will vote to remove from office. He will run for a second term and win. deep state cannot win. Trump needs to know that IMHO that you don't ask a foreign government to investigate your political opponent. And i am sure that is what he did........................
Do you really think Guiliani will be the only Trump attorney involved in an impeachment trial.
Based on Trump's completely incompetent two year defense against the Russia Hoax, I predict every impeachment lawyer Trump hires will be even more pitiful than Giuliani.
Say wuh?
Oh no you don’t! Only if he is CONVICTED by the Senate is he removed and inelligible to hold another office. He’ll never be convicted.
Thanks for giving the links to the Trump-Zelensky call, and the “Whistleblower” complaint.
I can agree w/ you that Whistleblower looks like propaganda, but it is something more. Is the CIA / deep state involved here? It is too neatly crafted. It should have stated facts specifically about the sources of his/her 2nd hand knowledge - “so-and-so told me this about such and such on this date.” Maybe that detail was in classified attachments referenced on page 1? Jay Sekulow claims the letter was written by lawyers ... I think he is right. Mr. Whistleblower should be able to support everything in his letter ...who (WH personnel), what, where details of everything written. Since he quoted US statutes and EO, understanding his background, in this area and others would have to be cross-examined. I am sure Whistleblower is a sophisticated person, but how sophisticated to remember all the details under oath? Expect the demokraps, unlike the other Whistleblower Lewinsky, attempt to protect Whistleblower’s identity in trying to bring down a POTUS.
Whistleblower cites page 6 the NY Times May 9th article that Guiliani planned to travel to the Ukraine to help Trump’s 2020 re-election bid. Giuliani neever said that in the article ... but the article said that Trump’s (unnamed) allies were pushing for this. Here is what Giuliani was quoted in NYT as saying on May 9:
““We’re not meddling in an election, we’re meddling in an investigation, which we have a right to do,” Mr. Giuliani said in an interview on Thursday when asked about the parallel to the special counsel’s inquiry.
“There’s nothing illegal about it,” he said. “Somebody could say it’s improper. And this isn’t foreign policy — I’m asking them to do an investigation that they’re doing already and that other people are telling them to stop. And I’m going to give them reasons why they shouldn’t stop it because that information will be very, very helpful to my client, and may turn out to be helpful to my government.”
Hence, there should be no surprise that July 25th Trump-Zelensky phone call the Crowdstrike and the Biden topics were there. The demokraps jumped the gun too early here ... they needed to wait until Giuliani collected the official non-public government investigation info and Trump used government only info in the 2020 campaign.
As Nancy Peloser has said - “No one is above the law.” Yepp, the illegal alien using Social Security numbers is not above the law, and neither is the Biden family. The demokraps are working overtime to prevent the truth (and possible prosecutions) about the Russian hoax from happening .... Kiev with its Russian ties may be the key.
Hmmm...yeah...ask one Alcee Hastings about THAT.
They impeach Trump they’d better watch their backs. Some won’t appreciate it.
"I THOUGHT there had to be a vote for impeachment in the house.
And now i know that a vote for impeachment doesn’t kick the POTUS out of office
the senate vote can do that right?"
"I read here that they just need a simple senate majority to keep him from running again."
"what’s that business that the senate also has the option to vote simple majority to prevent trump from runnning again"
Perhaps your excuse is you've spent too many years inhaling the refinery fumes wafting east across the Arthur Kill.
Won't be any judges there, just Congress...Who's going to prosecute??? It'll be a trial without a judge and everyone will plead the 5th, if they show up...
I am sick of this belief that impeaching Trump is somehow advantageous to Trump. We live in very dangerous times.
He might be impeached, but he will never be convicted.
AND, if for some reason they DO convict him, that is the spark for the next openly violent civil war.
Several dead SOB Washington DC politicians will prove to the rest that maybe, just maybe they made a big mistake.
The House will try to impeach and yes they may. The Senate will not impeach him.
President Trump will run and win.
As President he most certainly can make enquiries regarding govt corruption and bribes with leaders of other nations.
As well as several dead media whores.
“Something is wrong, it has been far too one sided in all this.”
It’s called the media and its partisanship / in bed with the demokraps. Not trying to kill the messenger here, but this is the reality. For example, Trump claimed early on in the Russia hoax that his campaign was “wiretapped”, i.e. spied upon. The media mocked him and said he had no evidence. The story went different direction, full bore ad nauseum that he colluded with the Russians/hoax. Eventually it came out that his campaign was in fact spied upon ... media crickets.
That is true, but I don't think it was their choice. I have a feeling it was more Ivanka and Jarod's control.
Good point. They may indeed be acting but we would never know from the MSM. But even then there isn’t really much coming out concerning his lawyers actions aggressive or not from the conservative circles either.
Trump will not be removed from office. If that were to happen, however, he will never be elected nor will he ever be the Republican Party nominee. He may run as a third party candidate, ensuring a Democrat victory, and that is his leverage over the GOP.
Anyone reading this: PLEASE contact YOUR elected representatives TODAY and let them know how YOU feel.
He posts a vanity then uses “IMHO”. What a phoney.
You left out the part where 100,000 die from lead poisoning.
ML/NJ
Nope. Not a chance
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.