Posted on 06/10/2019 2:01:01 PM PDT by DollyCali
GOOD ~Japan awesome visit
VERY GOOD ~ Europe awesome visit
BAD ~ crappy media coverage of both trips
UGLY ~mysterious deaths continue
Welcome all you Deplorables to this week's edition of the Dose!
This is EVERYTHING TRUMP.
Administration, family, frustrations, joys, winning!
We welcome your research, your commentary,
your personal OT sharing and your presence.
Even if you do not share a lot, just check in and say hi.
Lurkers are welcome to become posters!
Deplorably wonderful this week
First couple visit Arlington for Pre-memorial Day visit as they will be out of the country for the day.5/23/19
THIS AND THAT HAPPENINGS
STATE VISITS TO JAPAN AND EUROPE
more pix at post #1
WACKY
Keep the Truth coming Mr. President
Keep on Tweeting!
Off subject. Has anyone heard more about hillbillys dead brother, Tony? Thought he dropped about a week ago, but nothing that I have seen. No state funeral, nothing. I would expect we should have been blessed with endless tributes and heartfelt eulogies. An eternal flame, or something. I am just being nosy. Again, saw nothing on internet after the sad news from hillbilly.
being nosy.
Kevin Sorbo Verified account @ksorbs
68 people were killed in mass shootings in 2018. Did you know that about 2000 were killed by illegal aliens? Just saying.
Build the wall.
#BuildTheWall #BuildThatWall
Hundreds of ppl packed in semis don't just randomly happen, any more than hundreds of anything packed in semis just happen. https://t.co/Mg0GJmNwqF— J.E. Dyer (@OptimisticCon) June 17, 2019
https://100percentfedup.com/just-in-where-did-the-congolese-illegals-go-weve-got-the-list-of-cities-video/
Great last putt. Glad he won.
Kathy Griffin
Im so sorry Sec Clinton. You are a wonderful, fun and loyal sister. Remember when I went backstage to see you and he invited me to the fireworks show in DC for Fourth of July? Like it was a party you were personally throwing? Still makes me smile. You are soooo loved.
***********************
I’ve looked on twitter and have found nothing about a funeral.
Thank you ma, could not think of that site.
.
He died Friday, June 7.
No hits at all on a search for his funeral.
From Wikipedia
Rodham died on June 7, 2019, at the age of 64; his death was announced by his sister on Twitter on June 9. The cause of death was not announced.[41][42]
I don’t think anyone actually found an obituary. Like from a paper!
Incarnated_ET
FBI at hearing about Crowdstrike: the EPITOME of Ridiculous Bullshit
DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Agent Smith, you testified that the Russians hacked the DNC computers, is that correct?
FBI AGENT JOHN SMITH: That is correct.
DEF ATT: Upon what information did you base your testimony?
******
AGENT: Information found in reports analyzing the breach of the computers.
DEF ATT: So, the FBI prepared these reports?
AGENT: (cough) . (shift in seat) No, a cyber security contractor with the FBI.
******
DEF ATT: Pardon me, why would a contractor be preparing these reports? Do these contractors run the FBI laboratories where the server was examined?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: No? No what? These contractors dont run the FBI Laboratries?
******
AGENT: No. The laboratories are staffed by FBI personnel.
DEF ATT: Well I dont understand. Why would contractors be writing reports about computers that are forensically examined in FBI laboratories?
AGENT: Well, the servers were not examined in the FBI laboratory.
(silence)
******
DEF ATT: Oh, so the FBI examined the servers on site to determine who had hacked them and what was taken?
AGENT: Uh .. no.
DEF ATT: They didnt examine them on site?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: Well, where did they examine them?
AGENT: Well, uh .. the FBI did not examine them?
******
DEF ATT: What?
AGENT: The FBI did not directly examine the servers?
******
DEF ATT: Agent Smith, the FBI has presented to the Grand Jury and to this court and SWORN AS FACT that the Russians hacked the DNC computers. You are basing your SWORN testimony on a report given to you by a contractor, while the FBI has NEVER actually examined the hardware?
******
AGENT: That is correct.
DEF ATT: Agent Smith, who prepared the analysis reports that the FBI relied on to give this sworn testimony?
AGENT: Crowdstrike, Inc.
DEF ATT: So, which Crowdstrike employee gave you the report?
******
AGENT: We didnt receive the report directly from Crowdstrike?
DEF ATT: What?
AGENT: We did not receive the report directly from Crowdstrike?
DEF ATT: Well, where did you find this report?
******
AGENT: It was given to us by the people who hired Crowdstrike to examine and secure their computer network and hardware.
DEF ATT: Oh, so the report was given to you by the technical employees for the company that hired Crowdstrike to examine their servers?
AGENT: No.
******
DEF ATT: Well, who gave you the report?
AGENT: Legal counsel for the company that hired Crowdstrike?
DEF ATT: Why would legal counsel be the ones giving you the report?
AGENT: I dont know.
DEF ATT: Well, what company hired Crowdstrike?
******
AGENT: The Democratic National Committee.
DEF ATT: Wait a minute. Let me get this straight. You are giving SWORN testimony to this court that Russia hacked the servers of the Democratic National Committee. And you are basing that testimony on a report given to you by the LAWYERS
******
...for the Democratic National Committee. And you, the FBI, never actually saw or examined the computer servers?
AGENT: That is correct.
DEF ATT: Well, can you provide a copy of the technical report produced by Crowdstrike for the Democratic National Committee?
******
AGENT: No, I cannot.
DEF ATT: Well, can you go back to your office and get a copy of the report?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: Why? Are you locked out of your office?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: I dont understand. Why can you not provide a copy of this report?
******
AGENT: Because I do not have a copy of the report.
DEF ATT: Did you lose it?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: Why do you not have a copy of the report?
AGENT: Because we were never given a final copy of the report?
******
DEF ATT: Agent Smith, if you didnt get a copy of the report, upon what information are you basing your testimony?
AGENT: On a draft copy of the report.
DEF ATT: A draft copy?
AGENT: Yes.
DEF ATT: Was a final report ever delivered to the FBI?
AGENT: No.
******
DEF ATT: Agent Smith, did you get to read the entire report?
AGENT: No.
DEF ATT: Why not?
AGENT: Because large portions were redacted.
******
DEF ATT: Agent Smith, let me get this straight. The FBI is claiming that the Russians hacked the DNC servers. But the FBI never actually saw the computer hardware, nor examined it? Is that correct?
AGENT: That is correct.
******
DEF ATT: And the FBI never actually examined the log files or computer email or any aspect of the data from the servers? Is that correct?
AGENT: That is correct.
******
DEF ATT: And you are basing your testimony on the word of Counsel for the Democratic National Committee, the people who provided you with a REDACTED copy of a DRAFT report, not on the actual technical personnel who supposedly examined the servers?
AGENT: That is correct.
******
DEF ATT: Your honor, I have a few motions I would like to make at this time.
PRESIDING JUDGE: Im sure you do, Counselor. (as he turns toward the prosecutors) And I feel like I am in a mood to grant them
******
1. Obama Appoints CrowdStrike Officer To Admin Post Two Months Before June 2016 Report On Russia Hacking DNC
In April 2016, two months before the June report that alleged a Russian conspiracy, former President Barack Obama appointed Steven Chabinsky, the general counsel and
******
chief risk officer for CrowdStrike, to the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity.
CrowdStrike co-founder George Kurtz said at the time, We wish Steve and the rest of the Commissioners every success in this important effort.
******
NIKK......more coming from the thread of Incarnated_ET
Their dedicated and thoughtful leadership on these issues holds great potential for promoting innovation and the benefits of technology, while lowering the very real security risks we are facing today.https://t.co/XYer1o4aSp— Incarnated_ET (@Incarnated_ET) June 16, 2019
Link to Crowdstrikes bullshit findings posted 3 years ago June 15th, 2016https://t.co/gdptRxDlPv— Incarnated_ET (@Incarnated_ET) June 16, 2019
Incarnated_ET
Booom. NObamas f@cked
******
This was written by a legal anon as a forecast based upon what we already know to be true.
This is not an actual transcript
******
I know. I thought it was actual too.
******
BOOTSTRAPPING
This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way
******
to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party
..
******
despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.
This technique of framing a case is called BOOTSTRAPPING.
******
You take an allegation and run it through successive steps wherein the allegation is morphed into a fact.
Each time the allegation is relied upon to produce another false conclusion, it looks like an indisputable fact.
******
- First you have Crowdstrike claiming the Russians hacked the DNC.
- Congressional Testimony on television, plus media reporting, build from that allegation.
- The JAR and the ICA build it up some more.
******
- Then comes the Special Counsel investigation producing indictment of the alleged Russian perpetrators that everyone starts using as evidence when indictments are only the allegations.
This is the essence of Bootstrapping.
******
Each use of the allegation to prove something makes the allegation become a kind of AXIOM that is accepted a true without proof, and is now buried under all the government documents, reams of newsprint, hours of televised claims, and digital noise.
******
When pressed, just call any skeptic a Russian Bot or Putin Shill.
******
This thread is a forecast of what the legal questioning would look like based upon information we already know to be true.
It was written by a legal anon without sauce. I was duped to think it was real. None the less , this is likely the convo to be had.
*not actual transcript*
https://t.co/UzRGWxHLKn— Incarnated_ET (@Incarnated_ET) June 16, 2019
https://t.co/vQfMrJTwsg— Incarnated_ET (@Incarnated_ET) June 16, 2019
*
SO. ....the purpose of. The Stone arrest is to bring all the “speculated “’ truth forward? Geese
America Prayer Vigil
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3757374/posts
May the truth see the light. No more darkness!
Prayers for our government.
Messaged you Techno Fog twitter link with supportive information
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.