Incarnated_ET
Booom. NObama’s f@cked
******
This was written by a legal anon as a forecast based upon what we already know to be true.
This is not an actual transcript
******
I know. I thought it was actual too.
******
BOOTSTRAPPING
“This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way
******
to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party…..
******
despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor.”
This technique of framing a case is called BOOTSTRAPPING.
******
You take an allegation and run it through successive steps wherein the allegation is morphed into a fact.
Each time the allegation is relied upon to produce another false conclusion, it looks like an indisputable fact.
******
- First you have Crowdstrike claiming the Russians hacked the DNC.
- Congressional Testimony on television, plus media reporting, build from that allegation.
- The JAR and the ICA build it up some more.
******
- Then comes the Special Counsel “investigation” producing indictment of the alleged Russian perpetrators that everyone starts using as evidence when indictments are only the allegations.
This is the essence of “Bootstrapping.”
******
Each use of the allegation to “prove” something makes the allegation become a kind of AXIOM that is accepted a true without proof, and is now buried under all the government documents, reams of newsprint, hours of televised claims, and digital noise.
******
When pressed, just call any skeptic a “Russian Bot” or “Putin Shill.”
******
This thread is a forecast of what the legal questioning would look like based upon information we already know to be true.
It was written by a legal anon without sauce. I was duped to think it was real. None the less , this is likely the convo to be had.
*not actual transcript*
