Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA accurately calculates Milky Way's weight using Gaia, Hubble telescopes
FoxNews.com/Science ^ | Mar 8, 2019 | Ann W. Schmidt | Fox News

Posted on 03/09/2019 10:18:12 AM PST by ETL

Scientists have finally been able to accurately calculate the weight of the Milky Way, overcoming the difficult hurdle of measuring dark matter, the European Space Agency (ESA) announced Thursday.

After years of struggling to estimate the size of our galaxy, astronomers with NASA and the ESA used data from the Hubble Space Telescope and the ESA’s Gaia mission to determine the Milky Way weighs about 1.5 trillion solar masses within a radius of 129,000 light years from the center.

Because dark matter makes up about 90 percent of the galaxy, estimates of the Milky Way’s weight have differed widely in the past.

Previous measurements ranged from 500 billion to 3 trillion times the mass of the Sun.

"We just can't detect dark matter directly," Laura Watkins, of the European Southern Observatory in Germany who led the team’s analysis, said in a statement.

"That's what leads to the present uncertainty in the Milky Way's mass – you can't measure accurately what you can't see."

Because dark matter is so difficult to calculate, Watkins and her team measured the velocities of dense star clusters, called globular clusters, that orbit the galaxy’s spiral disc.

They used data from Gaia, the ESA’s space observatory, to measure globular clusters as far as 65,000 light-years away from Earth and data from the Hubble Space Telescope — a project shared by NASA and the ESA — to measure globular clusters as far as 130,000 light-years away from Earth.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Chit/Chat; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; darkenergy; darkforce; darkmatter; esa; gaia; hst; hubble; laurawatkins; milkyway; nasa; science; speedofdark; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 03/09/2019 10:18:12 AM PST by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ETL

Who is going to prove them wrong?


2 posted on 03/09/2019 10:24:40 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just hava few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

NASA accurately calculates

about 1.5 is accurate?


3 posted on 03/09/2019 10:25:11 AM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“accurately calculates”? How could this be known? I’m just sayin’


4 posted on 03/09/2019 10:26:56 AM PST by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Really? What's so complicated about that? It tells you the weight right on the package...2.05oz (at least, that's the weight this week).


5 posted on 03/09/2019 10:27:43 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
If they can calculate weight, that means they should be able to calculate size. How far is it to the edge of the universe?
6 posted on 03/09/2019 10:30:17 AM PST by Cowboy Bob ("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
And, it's obvious NASA had their top scientist on it...


7 posted on 03/09/2019 10:31:21 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Does anything really have weight in space? Doesn’t weight have to have gravitational properties surrounding it.


8 posted on 03/09/2019 10:31:54 AM PST by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Oh, and thanks for the new background for my desktop display...it's lovely.


9 posted on 03/09/2019 10:34:02 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
> Who is going to prove them wrong? <

My money is on this guy:


10 posted on 03/09/2019 10:34:44 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moovova
Yeah, but now we know there are 3,000,000 times the solar mass of the sun of dark matter, in with that 2.5 oz.


11 posted on 03/09/2019 10:37:43 AM PST by C210N (You can vote your way into Socialism; but, you have to shoot your way out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jolla
The solar mass (M☉) is a standard unit of mass in astronomy, equal to approximately 2×1030 power kg.

...and contrary to conditions on earth, astronomical photos have a slimming effect such that the Milky Way looks 10 pounds lighter that it is.

12 posted on 03/09/2019 10:37:51 AM PST by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jetson

> Does anything really have weight in space? Doesn’t weight have to have gravitational properties surrounding it. <

Good catch. And you’re right. The title should have been: NASA accurately calculates Milky Way’s mass.

An error like that kinda makes you wonder about the rest of the article.


13 posted on 03/09/2019 10:38:38 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jetson

Mass.


14 posted on 03/09/2019 10:40:04 AM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Dark matter is an assumption to explain galaxy shape using gravity only.

What about electromagnetically charged plasma? That force would produce observed shape and does not require imagined matter.


15 posted on 03/09/2019 10:40:40 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Next, they turn their sights on Rosie O’Donnell and Michael Moore. But not at the same time ...


16 posted on 03/09/2019 10:41:11 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Compassion; All

Deriving the Galactic Mass from the Rotation Curve

https://www.astronomynotes.com/ismnotes/s7.htm#A2.4


17 posted on 03/09/2019 10:43:37 AM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ETL
1 solar mass = 1.989 × 1030 kg

1 trillion = 1 x 1012

Mass of Milky Way: 1.989 x 1042 kg

That's a BIG number. I've got my own conservation of mass program underway where I'm trying to transfer a few kg from my own mass back to the Milky Way. The Milky Way is welcome to my extra kg.

18 posted on 03/09/2019 10:45:19 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
Supposedly the earth is weightless. But it is also said to weigh 6.585 sextillion tons (that's 10 to the 21st power). The sun has 333,000 times the mass of the earth. So if the Milky Way's mass is 1.5 trillion times the mass of the sun, the weight of the Milky Way should be something like 3.3 duodecillion tons (or 10 to the 39th power).

But my math could be wrong. To get the weight in pounds, multiply by 2,000.

19 posted on 03/09/2019 10:47:37 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ETL
How hard can it be to weigh MilkyWays? They only have one Star.


20 posted on 03/09/2019 10:48:51 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson