Q Anon: 02/24/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 02/24/19 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	Where We Go 1 We Go All	Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration. - 6 min
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
Table	tang-soo et. al.	Q Boot Camp Quickest way to learn the basics about Q.
YouTube	Storm Is Upon Us	Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube	Dan Duval	Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 -Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread	Qanon.app	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	Qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Thread	Qmap.pub	QProofs/Memes - compiled “proofs” and memes
The Oracle	Bagster	The Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website	FBI	vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Table	FReeQs	Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
Post	FReeQs	Technical Tips -Learn how to meme, post graphics, code HTML
	“Power to the People”
Twitter	Sara Carter	Fox News National Security/War Correspondent sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	John Solomon	Award winning investigative journalist sometimes cited by Q
Twitter	Praying Medic	Q-drop reactions. Also, YouTube, Vimeo, Podbean.com and ITunes
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Website	Saul Montes-Bradley	Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex, Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
YouTube	X22 Report	Investigative Q-drop reactions
YouTube	In Pursuit of Truth	Brisk, lively drop analysis. Also on Gab.Ai
Twitter	Lisa Mei Crowley	Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
Thread	Jim Robinson	Board Owner's Rules for Posts on Free Republic
	“Fight, Fight, Fight! ”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images

[Publius]

Post #1379.

[KitJ]

You found the answer before I could. I’m pretty sure it hit a Federal court where it was OK’d to ask, then the left appealed to take it to the Supremes, and they have to look at it fast since it starts next year.

[greeneyes]

Darn. Whatever-it may technically be ok, but to me it violates the spirit of the law.

[eldoradude]

Real Democracy = communism.

[Publius]

Give me a few minutes to write this up because it goes all the way back in our history.

[greeneyes]

So it’s gonna be Red Blooded Bitter Clingers against Soi Boi/goi?

Wonder how that will turn out?

[EasySt]

"Oh wait, they did vote to kill children after they are born, so they have that going for them......"

Click for bigger...

[greeneyes]

Great. Discourage me further. Kidding-it will be interesting, as all your stuff is.

[stylin19a]

thanks.
I read the whole article when it was published.
several months to me is more than 2.
You can try and stop junk mail here https://dmachoice.thedma.org/ yet it still comes...I just shredded 9 pieces of junk mail today. I cannot fit several months of mail in my mailbox and I have petty decent size mailbox.
I wonder how big a unit mailbox is in a Bronx condo ?
Maybe some one other than OAC picked it up every now and again, otherwise I just don’t buy it.

[greeneyes]

LOL. I’m printing this to show my Hubby.

[KitJ]

Thanks for weighing in. We appreciate your expertise.

[BiggBob]

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner.

Great electoral college video by Prager

https://youtu.be/V6s7jB6-GoU

[EasySt]

You bet!
I’m starting to figure out how it works.

One of my infrequent replies last week to a TWitterite got a few likes and a few hundred impressions.

That was enough to push it into the top replies.

THAT MADE IT MOAR VISIBLE, and it quickly got over 6000 impressions, and went up 20 likes and some retweets. Still spreading...

You are the news now.

[eldoradude]

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what’s for dinner.

Yes, classic ;)

Two chickens and a pig voting on what's for breakfast.

[little jeremiah]

Okay, one detail is maybe off. But that doesn’t invalidate the rest of the article.

[little jeremiah]

When you say “Congress” must ratify the arrangement you mean both houses, right?

[eldoradude]

[eldoradude]

[Publius]

The Constitution gives state legislatures plenary power to appoint presidential electors. In our earliest elections, in only a few states did the legislature authorize a popular vote to choose electors. Even then, the legislature used the current Maine/Nebraska formula: one elector for each congressional district based on the popular vote in that district, and two electors for the state at large based on the popular vote for the whole state. By the 1830s, the current winner-take-all approach to electoral votes became predominant.

By 1844, only South Carolina still had the legislature appointing presidential electors, and that ended in 1868 when a carpetbagger legislature brought South Carolina into harmony with the rest of the nation.

In the contested election of 1876, southern states under military occupation saw the people voting for Democratic electors. Charging fraud, the carpetbagger legislature appointed its own slate of Republican electors. Going completely outside the Constitution, Congress appointed a board of 4 Republicans and 3 Democrats to decide which slate of electors to accept for the congressional tally of electoral votes. In each case, the vote was 4 to 3 to accept the Republican slates. And so Rutherford Hayes of Ohio defeated Samuel Tilden of New York.

In 1877 the dispute made its way to the Supreme Court, and the Court ruled that the state legislature had an undisputed right to appoint electors. A state legislature could even refuse to hold a popular election for electors and appoint its own slate.

In 2000, the Florida Legislature appointed a Republican slate of electors in case the dispute over the election ran past the Safe Harbor Date established by federal law in 1887. The Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore eliminated the need to appoint that slate.

The initiative in question would require a state’s legislature to hand its duty of appointing electors to the winner of the national popular vote, not the winner of the state’s popular vote, nor the winner of the popular vote of any of its congressional districts. As long as a state’s legislature makes that decision, it’s legal for that state.

Because this would be an interstate pact, it would require congressional approval from both Houses. If that happens, it’s legal and ready to go into effect.

The larger issue is the Guarantee Clause of Article IV. Is it “a republican form of government” for a state to ignore the votes of its own citizens to appoint a slate of electors that reflects the national popular will? That will end up in the Supreme Court.

[Bigg Red]

Thank you for explaining the story on the Oswalt tweets. So many moving parts...