Posted on 12/17/2018 9:03:18 AM PST by BenLurkin
In a Dec. 6 memo titled, "Space Development Agency Study Team Direction and Tasking," Griffin directed Fred Kennedy, director of DARPA's Tactical Technology Office, to lead a study team and come up with recommendations for the "implementation of the Space Development Agency.
The study team will "inventory the DoD space-based command-and-control capabilities, identify critical gaps, deficiencies and inefficiencies in our existing architectures and develop an agile responsive threat-driven architecture, associated infrastructure requirements and an acquisition construct," Griffin wrote.
The decision to assign this task to Kennedy is not surprising given his space expertise and track record attracting commercial space companies to defense programs. Like Griffin, Kennedy has been a longtime critic of the DoD culture that favors exquisite satellites that take decades to develop and cost far more than products available in the open market.
DARPA has been a champion of nontraditional approaches to making space systems more resilient by using small satellites in large numbers. DARPA conceived the Blackjack program to develop an experimental constellation of small satellites in low earth orbit to offer persistent, global coverage for military operations. Griffin frequently has cited Blackjack as a model for how to harness commercial innovation for national security.
Shanahan said last month that he projected the Space Development Agency would be stood up in the first quarter of calendar year 2019. During a roundtable with reporters on Thursday at an event hosted by the National Defense Industrial Association, Shanahan cautioned that many of the details about the new agency have yet to be decided.
(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...
The study team will “inventory the DoD space-based command-and-control capabilities, identify critical gaps, deficiencies and inefficiencies in our existing architectures and develop an agile responsive threat-driven architecture, associated infrastructure requirements and an acquisition construct,” Griffin wrote.
...
Sounds like an expensive and inefficient government project to me.
*ping*
Sounds like a needed direction.
So, the USAF Space Command, with all their successes, isn’t enough?
More wasted money.
It isn’t. That was a program based on the needs from 50 years ago and largely USAF based needs at that. The new program will develop a program for multiservice needs and will look ahead 50 years or more.
I would say it is finally money being spent wisely and unlike using a cruise missile to blow up a tent in the desert, it addresses security issues that affect all of us on a daily basis.
They stood by while their treasury was robbed.
Think again, NASA it one of the biggest waste.
Think again, NASA it one of the biggest waste.
Congress over the years turned NASA into primarily a jobs program.
The USAF program is multidepartmental program. It is also using the latest tech, so to say it’s 50 year old tech is just ignorance of their program.
Thanks fieldmarshaldj.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.