Reasonable match up of nose, teeth, forehead, cheekbones, hair. Time estimated one to two decades ago.
Posted on 09/27/2018 5:17:35 AM PDT by Lazamataz
Oh, this is bad for Brett Kavanaugh.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has just received an anonymous account that Kavanaugh did an unspecified thing at an unknown location at a time and date yet to be determined, and that he did it an un-quantifiable number of times. The declaration was signed by 1 to N "X"'s, which represent unnamed and anonymous witnesses. This nebulous and unstated accusation has thrown great uncertainty into his nomination.
Senator Hirohsi (D-HI) stated, "This is just the sort of thing that puts a cloud over Brett Kavanaugh. Do we want Supreme Court Justices that are accused of such heinous and unknowable acts?"
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) angrily said, "Undefined accusations make Kavanaugh an nonviable candidate. I call for an immediate FBI investigation to see if there is any merit to these vague and unformed charges. I demand that Kavanaugh withdraw his candidacy in the meantime."
Senator FineSlime (D-CA) admitted that these undetermined accusations were introduced at a rather late time, in violation of Senate rules, but stated that "There are, literally, an infinite number of additional, accompanying charges that will be coming. Can we afford to look into each one? Withdraw!"
This is a breaking story, no more details will be coming.
He had a wild affair with Princess Diana that caused her to leave Prince Charles.
But the question is: would Laz hit “X”?
I accept your opinion but I would NEVER use Snopes to support it!
Using Snopes actually weakens your view.
A presidential finding could solve the SOROS situation.
He was a nazi sympathizer in his youth.
A liberal fascist now.
Maybe farm it out to the Mossad.
No. Make effective use of that tool in front of you.
Did you not even search the name I provided? I got her name in a 30 second search and GAVE you the result, yet you still claim “reasonable”??? smh
“Confirmation bias”. Look it up.
Ok, well done. Now, look at #108.
Then see if you can debunk if Deborah Ramirez was a 2003 Soros Open Society Fellow.
A less humorous thought:
Watching the hearings and hearing Dr. Ford and realizing this troubled woman has taught and helped form/deform hundreds if not thousands of minds over the decades.
She’s a part of the reason why the state of CA is so FUBARed.
REGARDLESS OF VERACITY OF PHOTOS ON THE INTERNET WHICH ARE ALWAYS SUBJECT TO DISPUTE, THERE IS INDEED A CLOSE TIE TO CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD’S LAWYER AND SOROS.
FROM A WASHINGTON TIMES PIECE:
Look at what’s going on with Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation proceedings for the Supreme Court, and the fingerprints of George Soros are all over it.
First there was a report from June in the Daily Caller that found “a new political advocacy group that vowed to put $5 million behind an effort to stop … Kavanaugh’s confirmation has significant ties to the liberal financier” Soros.
What are those ties?
The group, Demand Justice, established in 2018, gets its money from the Sixteen Thirty Fund — and the Sixteen Thirty Fund received roughly $2.2 million from the Open Society Policy Center, one of Soros’ outlets, between the years of 2012 and 2016.
And Demand Justice’s entire mission is to advance a progressive agenda through the courts.
Debra Katz, the attorney representingKavanaugh’s accuser — Christine Blasey Ford — is vice chair of the Project on Government Oversight, an organization that has been directly funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation.
Katz is also a hefty Democratic donor, giving thousands of dollars over the years to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other leftist candidates, as Front Page Mag reported.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/18/brett-kavanaugh-christine-blasey-ford-and-links-ge
FURTHER, THERE IS A GO FUND ME PAGE FOR CHRISTINE FORD’S ‘SECURITY’ POSTED BY SOMEONE WHO ADMITS THEY DO NOT KNOW HER. THAT PAGE HAS ALREADY AMASSED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS IN A SHORT TIME.
ONE WOULD HAVE TO BE REALLY THICK TO THINK THAT SOROS IS NOT INVOLVED.
The photo in #108 is disputed. Some say the women walking behind HRC is Clinton’s official campaign photographer, Barbara Kinney, but Kinney is considerably younger than the woman show in the photo.
The terms ‘Clinton’ and ‘liar’ are near synonyms. And the association of these terms extends to Clinton’s network.
Oy!
I’m not out to debunk or prove anyone wrong. You misinterpret my intentions, perhaps of my statements on your egregious doubling-down on your “error” when presented with facts.
We as Conservatives need to be careful with facts & truth.
Period.
Nicely played
Too bad it’s true
There are unconfirmed reports from anonymous sources that this *may* be one of your finest posts ever.
He’s obviously guilty - he’s not asking for the FBI to investigate and can’t prove he didn’t do it......
The most common answer today: I don’t remember.
Personal friend of mine had reverse image search performed on an uploaded photo. It named another person as the likeness of the photo. This was done on one of the better image search apps.
Careful goes both ways.
As for debunking, you obviously did not see that the accuser is linked to Soros through her lawyer. That's important. Unless a person is trying to boost their own sense of self-importance with an 'I know better' schoolyard demeanor, the aim is to get useful info. If I wanted, I could spend all day and then some on how people do wrong things, I often point it out to them but come back with a point in their favor. Sometimes I've read the riot act to people that wasted my time. It only served to dampen enthusiasm for a topic. There are better ways to point out errors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
