Q Anon: (5/21/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 5/21/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Cboldt]

-- I think the REX thread was posted by someone earlier. --

Me @ post 64 a few hous ago.

FR is all about the repetition, few people read all the posts!

[little jeremiah]

Thank you for excellent publication.

[little jeremiah]

Just read The Bagster Oracle up above.

[bagster]

I LOVE that guy. He is the anti-Ryan, a great speaker and leader AND he is our people.

Go Go JJ!!!

Thanks for video. :)

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

[sweetiepiezer]

Here is another blue pill. David Axelrod ‏Verified account @davidaxelrod May 21 David Axelrod Retweeted Donald J. Trump The @POTUS quotes loopy right-wing tripe slandering @JohnBrennan, one of the finest public servants and most honorable people I’ve ever known. Please note that Trump’ OWN APPOINTEES, including his new SecState, have upheld the probity and findings of the IC’s Russia probe!

[TEXOKIE]

I’ve seen neonrevolt links posted here - I’VE even posted them here. Please, if you would provide the link to the missing I

[TEXOKIE]

:-D

I’d seen Jordan on Fox, and new he was good, and doing good work, but that speech helped me to assess the depth that is there.

[EMI_Guy]

Try this

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/05/21/the-missing-i-satellites-iridium-and-the-importance-of-secure-comms-qanon-greatawakening/

[Empireoftheatom48]

Q

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Woo Hoo! New fishing reel from Amazon was drone-dropped just now.

Time to string it up.
Lunch!

[ichabod1]

They’re saying Rosenswein is asking the IG to look into the campaign spying because the IG can’t talk to former empoloyees.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3657200/posts

[Bigg Red]

Mark

[WildHighlander57]

President Trump filed papers for re-election on inauguration day.

[Rusty0604]

Her email fiasco was discovered during the Benghazi investigation.

[meyer]

If’n you used the ones I sent you, it would be 188 but 14 are missing, so 174. But I’m not going to count them either. Just having my first coffee of the day.

[Rusty0604]

Huber can.

[bassyak]

Excellent news!!!

I’m hunting upstate NY smallies and pickerel this weekend.
Haven’t had a wet yak since September...

[weston]

Actually I was First at #47 but who’s counting ;)

[Cboldt]

Don't know how this flew under the radar ...

Federal judge rejects Manafort's bid to dismiss Mueller indictment - Politico

Judge rejects Manafort motion to dismiss Russia probe charges | TheHill

Numerous other reports. I just happened to bump into the decision itself, looking for the more recent motion (in the other Manafort case) relating to leaks.

Judge Jackson rejects Manafort Motion to Dismiss Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ, DC, May 16, 2018

Couple handy links ...

Docket for United States v. Manafort, 1:18-cr-00083 (NY, Judge Ellis)
Docket for United States v. MANAFORT, 1:17-cr-00201 (DC, Judge Jackson)

[Disestablishmentarian]

Nice job, but while 97% of FReeQ scientists now agree Rosenstein is a black hat, I still disagree.

It is impossible for Q/Trump forces to be in control if Rosenstein is not a white hat.

It is impossible to “Trust Sessions” if Rosenstein is not a white hat.

Mueller makes all the noises like a black hat; but, if Manafort turns out to be the mole (as I suspect), and Flynn is compromised (brought conflicts of interest into administration), then Mueller did Trump a favor by removing them from action.

I still think it is impossible to overestimate the magnitude of the indictments we all want to see. This MUST BE IRON-CLAD, and even measured ... or they will skate and Trump will lose politically for trying.

As you said, Bags, Q “all but says that Rosenstein will be gone” ...

That is still ambiguous; leaving room for the SURPRISE ATTACK.

I am cognizant of the “True beleiver” danger .... but this is where I still find myself today: Rosenstein has to be a white hat (and hence, Mueller too).