Posted on 04/24/2018 10:58:46 AM PDT by LibWhacker
The announcement by NASA that launch of the James Webb Space Telescope is going to be delayed over another year, now May 2020, felt like déjà vu.
When the JWST was first proposed in 1997, it was supposed to launch in 2007 and cost half a billion dollars. Now the launch date is 13 years later and the cost is at least $8.8 billion. NASA will have to go back to Congress for more money if the huge space observatory exceeds previous cost caps.
In the meantime, NASA is convening an independent review board that will examine the problems that have plagued the space based astronomy project. The board will map out the final testing and integration of the project and will present its findings to the space agency. After a NASA review, the report will be presented to Congress by the end of June.
The telescope is a worthy science mission. When it is finally launched on top of an Ariane 5 rocket, the JWST will spend 30 days traveling a million miles to an Earth-Sun Lagrange point, where it will begin its observations. The JWST will do everything from observing the afterglow of the Big Bang to imaging planets in other star systems. The telescope will be a worthy successor to the Hubble Space Telescope.
So, why has the JWST exploded in cost, and why is its completion date being constantly delayed? One reason is that the space telescope is one of the most complex instruments humans have ever attempted to deploy in space. Its primary mirror, measuring 6.5 meters, will be folded inside the rocket faring and will unfold once the telescope reaches space.
The JWST also sports a tennis-court-sized sunshield. Because the JWST images distant objects in infrared, it must be kept very cold, hence it needs to be shielded from the light and heat of the sun. The sunshield will also be folded inside the rocket and will unfold in space.
The main problem with the space telescope is that, unlike the Hubble, it cannot be serviced after it is deployed in space. The JWST will be too far away, and in any case, no one possesses the spacecraft that can send either astronauts or tele-operated robots to fix problems or perform enhancements.
The ability to be serviced saved the Hubble Space Telescope from disaster. When the Hubble was first launched, a flaw in the mirror made it all but useless. A daring space shuttle mission performed fixes to the space telescope that restored its function and enabled a steady stream of scientific discoveries. Subsequent missions enhanced the Hubble and extended its operational life. What might have been a disaster was transformed into one of the greatest scientific triumphs in human history.
However, the James Webb Space Telescope has to perform perfectly without outside intervention. The cause of the latest delay stems from the necessity to perform more integration tests of the space telescope’s various systems. Any design flaw, any manufacturing mistake, would doom the telescope to be an $8.8 billion piece of space junk. Testing has already uncovered a number of such problems, including leaky valves and tears in the sunscreen that occurred when it deployed.
Therefore, a lesson must be derived from the JWST. The more complex a spacecraft, the more likely it will be to fail. The problem could be mitigated by finding a less challenging solution, such as assembling the JWST in low Earth orbit and testing it there before moving it to its Earth-Sun Lagrange point. The James Webb Space Telescope could have been designed to be serviceable, if not by human astronauts, perhaps by robots that could be controlled from Earth. If NASA and its international partners take the lesson to heart, fiscal disasters such as the JWST may be avoided going forward.
Yes it has a yuge aperture
This is a waste of tax dollars. All this is futile. There is nothing out there. We could build the wall we so desperately need in this nation rather than fiddle with make work for egg head “scientists”. Do you know what is after infinity? More infinity.
They've been reassigned to study "global warming". Seriously.
Nasa wasted 25 years on exploring near earth orbits with the Space Shuttle. Basically they said “the moon was cool but let’s set out sights waaaay lower” and get stuck in a rut. Now they have just one major mission yet again: build a bigger, better hubbel. I hope someone at least checks the math this time, there won’t be a space shuttle available to send up and fix the lens.
No, it's its offspring:
Personally I think that a space telescope sounds like a perfect venture for a bunch of academic institutions to crack open their giant multi-billion dollar endowments and fund together. They would then share exclusive access to the telescope for use in their own research. Better than taxpayers funding all their research.
About 20 ft aperture. A real monster.
It might be servicable using robots at some point.
I think the Hubble telescope was a great success. I’m not a fan of the ISS or shuttle programs, however. The ISS is parked in a useless orbit, and is only good as a micro gravity laboratory. It doesn’t even need windows, although it has one or two. The shuttle was merely a space truck for hauling things back and forth from the ISS, or an occasional communications satellite. It had nothing to do with space exploration, like the previous programs.
dear paladin,
re: “Where are all of NASA’s rocket scientists?”
They WERE sent out among the lands under the orders of ‘the magic Negro’ to go ye forth and recruit mohammedan scientists.
I believe they all met up with ISIS-types instead.
Oh well.
A telescope in a black hole... ...and they talk about it like its a bad thing.
Wouldn’t it be the greatest astronomic achievement in the history of mankind?
;-)
Well met!
Hubble Ultra Deep is screen saver (or whatever they call it these days)
I can actually look at it and be amazed every single time
The original requirement was that they had to work for 25 years, then all would be forgiven. Then, of course, they started making noises about war crimes, and some of them decided to give up their US citizenship and return to Germany.
Of course, old age has claimed most of them by this point.
who is James Web and why does he have a telescope?
“Relax, it will be well worth it. ”
Then blow the dust off your own checkbook. This country is carrying 20 TRILLION dollars in debt.
L
Guy with a fistula and a black hole.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.