Posted on 03/12/2018 12:17:08 AM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638382/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
http://qanon.pub
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/#
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3638382/posts?page=2000#2000
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
If the ramifications of a ruling made by an officer not entitled to the office are small, such as for example the "unqualified" officer renders ONE ruling that affects ONE person, the courts will undo the little ruling, and will not invoke the de facto officer doctrine.
The larger the ramifications, the bigger the mistake in allowing an unqualified person to attain office, the more likely the courts will wave their hands, invoke "de facto officer doctrine," and let somebody else deal with the fallout.
Also the bigger the mistake, the more likely the court is to either not take the case, or rule that no mistake was made.
Judges get their positions largely based on gaslighting skills; and on a willingness to compromise principle to preserve status quo. If they didn;t possess those qualities, they would not be approved.
The problem started when 1/3 and 2/3 (portions) were “equated” with 0.333.. and 0.666.. (decimal values).
Further discussion was only intended to strengthen the initial error; hence, arrested development.
Now, mind you, I took Cboldt’s math exercise to be a bit of “funnin’” us. I thought it quite amusing (plus, I’d seen it before).
:: he does not believe in God or any higher power ::
Theologically, he does...the god/power is himself.
It expands the problem when it should reduce it, but still, logic is logic.
Can you pinpoint the error in it?
I was inspired by the "zero times a nickle" story. If zero times a nickle is a nickle, then 3=4.
Impending footage drop, looks like.
You didn’t miss a thing, except boys being boys - cutting each other down. Y’ALL PLEASE - don’t even READ the trolls. Once you see a troll — just scroll on past them and don’t even read what they post. They’ll get bored and go back in their holes.
If a + b = c, then a + b - c = 0
4(a + b - c) = 3(a + b - c) is true. It is 4*0 = 3*0, or 0=0
I think it started with the union movement in the 1890s.
You know, no matter how debased a people are by their ‘leaders’, renaissance is always waiting to spring when coercive controls and jack-booting are brought to a screeching halt, like with the Bubonic Plague. Imagine an actual renaissance of true spiritual genesis worldwide once the deep state MSM is strangled.
See my 422.
The error is equating the portion to the decimal.
Not having mathematical symbols, I’ll write it out:
One third (the portion) does NOT equal 1 divided by 3 (the decimal value).
Are we discussing different posts?
Who posted the faction problem?
Reed?
There are things on this plane of existence that we can't even see. (2 Kings 6:17-20; 1 Corinthians 2:9; 2 Corinthians 4:17-18) Angels surround us and we are blind to them.
Seems pretty grand to me. Just imagine if we could see the invisible things of God!
Good article from True Pundit posted in the Forum regarding Las Vegas-partial excerpt:
FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Agents Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence Including ISIS Terror Link to Mandalay Bay Massacre
The “official” narrative you’ve been fed by the FBI and Las Vegas officials about the massacre at Mandalay Bay that claimed 58 lives is purely fiction, a polished story contrived to cover up the disturbing facts surrounding the worst mass shooting ever in the United States, according the FBI insiders and high-ranking intelligence officials.
When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence of multiple gunmen, they told agents to stand down and focus on Paddock only.
Even a key internal audio captured by a hotel guest of multiple rifles firing from Mandalay Bay went ignored, covered up.
When FBI brass was provided the names of persons of interest who likely assisted Paddock, agents were instructed not to interview the individuals.
One would-be target was never pursued despite pleadings from intelligence officials and agents that he was possibly the second shooter.
The FBI uncovered specific evidence showing that Paddock was anti-Trump and had an affiliation with ANTIFA, though it never was divulged to the public and agents did not follow such leads, per orders of their superiors.
When FBI brass was given evidence that the shooting was possibly linked to ANTIFA radicals working with an ISIS-linked terror faction — including the full identities of some of the suspects with ties to both radical groups and at or near Mandalay Bay the night of the deadly shooting — agents were never instructed to follow up on the investigation and pursue the suspects.
When intelligence officials approached the FBI and LVMPD with external evidence that Paddock was only one member of an organized terror cell — which included as many as five gunman who planned to fire from the Mandalay Bay suite — the compelling evidence was covered up. Never pursued.
When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence that Paddock’s death was not a suicide, the intelligence was never pursued by the FBI and LVMPD.
FBI sources said Paddock suffered two gunshots. His autopsy report only details a single bullet to the head. FBI sources maintain Paddock’s autopsy was doctored and is a fraud.
I had intended to post a link to the FR thread, but lost it and it’s not coming up for me. So instead I’m posting link to True Pundit.
I understand fractions very well - they are a ratio. Divide 1 by 3 you get .33333.... to infinity it never ends. Same with 2 by 3. add the decimals and you get .999... to infinity.
It’s a mathematical idiosyncrasy - a thought problem that makes perfect logical sense but shouldn’t be. Yet a provable fact using basic mathematics.
Obviously you do.
ease up francis, and I'll leave you alone.
Wow...you're a piece of work. You guys should go start a thread on how to debunk Q instead of just ad hominem attacks on the freepers that are trying to figure this out.
Cletus.D.Yokel appeared to disagree, saying that there was inquality. Approaches one, but never getting there.
The conundrum is caused by taking a rational number, a fraction for example 1/3, and trying to conform it to a decimal fraction. The result is a "repeating decimal," basically an awkward way of stating what is more simply stated in original form, "1/3."
Tired of reading about math and fractions? I have the perfect solution. This bit of feel-good video shows the smartest woman in America walking down some stairs. Hilarity ensues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.