$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Kim Jong-Un is a psychopath as are Bill and Hillary Clinton, as are many others that grapple for power around the world. Their common characteristic is a tendency to risk the lives of their own citizens in their quest to hold onto power. It's what they do.
In our Age of Awareness brought in by wave after wave of new era connectivity, we cannot stand aside and let foreign as well as domestic psychopaths consign us to their versions of Hell for their benefit.
Uh, this article makes almost no sense.
It’d be easier to tell you which journalists don’t work for the CIA or other intelligence agencies than to list those who do. I GUARANTEE you that Anderson Cooper (Mother’s maiden name Vanderbilt) is one example.
Assuming an opponent has your exact same motivations, ethics, limits, and goals... very very foolish.
I wonder China who it is China that has the most China to gain China from the actions China of Kim Il China?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
The North Korean regime gains potential customers among the hate America crowd and North Korea itself gains a continued existence on the border of China by causing a problem that only China can solve, if it feels like it, or maybe if you beg and grovel enough (and then again maybe not). The regime stands to gain, the North Koreans themselves stand to gain only destruction be it long and drawn out or quick and painful.
RBG, I agree that this article makes no sense. I’d ask the author: “And what will David Petraeus’ reward for all of the work you (the author) describe?”
Useless bit of blogdom....
Is it a false flag even Trump doesn’t know about?
PING
The central question of relevance is then:
WHAT DOES NORTH KOREA HAVE TO GAIN BY LAUNCHING AN ICBM WITH AN H2 BOMB?
Some answers though irrational are offered below.
However first, we have observed facts from Deep State actors.
For example, Petraeus was in NYC in February this year at a poorly attended talk with four other panelists and focused solely on North Korea and what a threat they are because for example, they built a bridge in record time (???), and because of these things it was necessary to bomb them. There is video of this talk and it is bizarre, to say the least. My take on Petraeus after hearing this talk was I wouldn't trust Petraeus further than I could throw him. I think he's an utterly compromised tool.
Many people of repute silently believe Petraeus has been tasked to lead the 'Deep State' in a process of slow soft coup against our President. - Maybe, maybe not. - The known facts do not implicate him and they at the same time don't clear him.
Because he is untrustworthy in my view, I remain suspicious of him. That suspicion is his doing, not mine. He has done NOTHING to build trust with the American people. In fact, he has done the opposite.
The same investigators of repute believe Petraeus is tasked to preserve the corruption, the pay-to-play, the illicit arms and drug trade, CIA rogue operators, the swift march towards world government and globalism, and to execute all the sordid 'games' played to preserve the Elite's corrupt power structure. I don't have enough information to dismiss such suspicions but at the same time, I can't be comfortable knowing it's all just a load of conspiracy huey.
Given the facts we now know about Petraeus, the above is not as far-fetched as we would think.
Next, note that investigators are closing in on the Clinton Foundation, the Awan Muslim Brotherhood Spy Ring, Huma Abedin as a Saudi Spy, and other 'Swamp' related persons and events, THEN SUDDENLY North Korea is reported to have detonated an H2 Bomb causing an earthquake of 6+.
Who reported this? Who verified it? Should we be asking these types of questions?
Say the H2 bomb report is true. Why is it in NK's interest to do such a thing?
Check out Article.
.
"Why in the backdrop of all this Hell on Earth would the psychopath Kim Jong-Un execute at breakneck speed a program to acquire a hydrogen bomb and delivery system?"
To ask the question, as if it would make no sense, in the mind of North Korea's leaders to do what they seem to be doing, is to not understand just how radically different is the national and world view of things to the dictators in North Korea.
The conspiracy rests on the belief, in error in my view, that there is no way the dictators of North Korea are doing - arming themselves with nuclear arms, because it makes no sense TO US. Despite not just our intelligence services but others around the world agree they are in fact doing what is generally suspected they are doing.
Yes, here in the west, it can seem "illogical", but to mistake that as though it should NOT seem purely logical to the dictators of North Korea, is nothing more or less than not understanding them and the way THEY think.
And more important is the question who in the hell is helping this crazy son-of-a-bitch?"
Many intelligence sources and reports, from multiple countries have indicated that North Korea has advanced primarily on its own initiative, as far as actually working things out, but also with theft (illicit purchases which are done with third parties and appearing to go to destinations that are not North Korea, but are in fact destined for and arrive there) and outright direct purchase of some needed designs and engineering processes; in the areas of the nuclear material development, war head design and materials, targeting guidance engineering, missile design and missile/rocket motors, which it then refined to its own designs.
Candidates in the outright purchases have been Pakistan, Iran and lately with rocket engines possibly Ukraine &/or Iran again as well.
And, one thing the writer fails with entirely is any background (unless its in the video) for evidence for how he places Petraeus into all this. Does he assume we all supposed to just go read all his stuff somewhere else, that describes about Petraeus the role the writer gives him.
Sorry, no. For the claims about Petraeus alone, the writer fails to make his case. That would be enough, if also the writer wasn't failing in thinking the dictators in North Korea are assessing things the same way the writer would.
Easy-peezey !
The UN gives them $1 million dollars in food, that the US paid for, to feed the military, while the population starves !
The Russians give them our uranium
The Indians gave them centrifuges
The Iranians gave them the nuclear reactor technology to increase radioactivity, and grow their nuclear stockpile.
The Chinese gave them the rocket technology and telemetry (thanks to Clinton with our technology)which is the delivery system.
And our Congress, which can't even eliminate an unConstitutional health care system, is too busy looking for a "Russian connection", where there isn't one,
all the while the Awan Brothers Cartel still has access to National Intelligence and National Security through all the Democratic representatives.
And yet ,you wonder who the SOB's are ?
It is the media and the press who refuse to admit that "the hack" was an inside job, done by an IT "Trojan Horse" which is totally being ignored,..and is still active.
The only investigation being conducted is being done by the Keystone Cops of D.C., who don't have the capacity to conduct such an investigation,
with a prosecutor who is related to the seditionist who brought the Trojan into information /intelligence of government (and are still there).
Who are the SOBs ? We all are - for not insisting that investigations based on contrived "Feelings" be eliminated, and conduct inquisitions based on FACTS !
We all contributed because we didn't yell - ENOUGH WITH THE BS - based on "hurt feelings" !
FIND CULPABILITY WITH THE CRIMINAL FACTS THAT ARE ALREADY EVIDENT AND STATED !
Thanks for posting
The Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons at the US's insistence and promise of protection, and look what happened to them.
Libya's Qaddafi gave up his nuclear programme, and ended up sodomized to death with a bayonet, because Crooked Hillary wanted a pipeline. ("We came, we saw, he died. (cackle)")
The NK regime knows that a nuclear deterrent is their best defense against the cowardly swamp that is Washington, DM (District of Mordor).
Waddaya think about this thread article Fred? A bit too heavy on the vast deep state conspiracy?
bkmk