Leaked Monmouth U. polling memo: Democrats ‘despondent’; Hillary..., seen as a ‘lying harpy’
A lying harpy? Really? Say it isn't so. /s
Check out # 54 .
Thanks, Future Useless Eater.
Posted on 10/06/2016 6:09:35 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas
The Florida geography is also working against us. Hillary has 53+ Field Offices and they’re empty of volunteers. This lack of enthusiasm is showing up in the voting responses and it’s killing us. The “cell phones” rationale will only hold out for so long.
(Excerpt) Read more at fellowshipoftheminds.com ...
See, that risk of enthusiasm collapse is real. That’s what we’ve been seeing with her rallies. A real fact.
Certainly the MSM is trying to cover that up. They don’t show Trump’s large crowds and they don’t show her dinky crowds.
Leaked Monmouth U. polling memo: Democrats ‘despondent’; Hillary..., seen as a ‘lying harpy’
A lying harpy? Really? Say it isn't so. /s
Check out # 54 .
Thanks, Future Useless Eater.
First of all much of this memo is exactly how the MSM works. Changing the narrative is what they do.
Her voters enthusiasm is in the tank. Even the MSM can’t hide that fact.
The alternative news is breaking through the noise.
Hahaa. Panties in a wad.
- - - - -
“Threats
People are leaking a lot . If you don’t want Enten’s gang all over you, we suggest you lock it the f@#&# down. There are a lot of people poking around the edges that are on to things and a bunch of stuff out on the Internet that is more hit-than-miss. PPP’s extremely unwise decision not to disavow the leaks on Twitter has costs us a great deal of credibility and voters are a lot more educated about cross-tabs and skewing and we may not have as easy a time of it as we did in 2012.
Finally, we know you consider Quinnipiac a “rival school.” Put that aside and stand down your hackers and arson-units. This is a team effort. If we lose this election we’re all f*#@*!d. Ensure loyalty in your staff by whatever means necessary. Keep appearances up. DO NOT SCREW THIS UP”
- - - -
So PPP didn’t “disavow leaks” reported on Twitter. Wonder what that was?
There’s no one who wants Trump to win more than me, but I’m just really dubious that this is a hoax. If it helps keep the good guys’ sanity in check the next several weeks until more favorable polling rolls in, I’ll take it. But, I still have the scars from questioning the veracity of polls in 2012.
Interesting
Interesting but probably a hoax.
It’s a fake.
TWITTER: Leaked Email - Monmouth Rigged It’s Poll ... - Free Republic
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3471934/posts
Free Republic
Sep 21, 2016 - 51 posts - 45 authors
Fake/Untrue things can still have a negative impact on Monmouth, Hillary, .... The Director of Polling at Monmouth is named Patrick Murray for ...
We’ll see. But they do make mistakes such as Hillary and her appearances—”Why aren’t I 50pts ahead you might ask?”
“This is a plant to make Trump voters look stupid.”
Agreed. Wish they’d erase this. It makes us look really dumb.
It makes us look really dumb.
_______________
Can’t look any dumber than Hillary right now.
Would that be “fake, but accurate”?
Would that be “fake, but accurate”?
_________________
Yep, we have a winner. Thanks.
#1 In Iowa, you can vote already. So far, returned ballots from registered Democrats are down 50% from 2012.
#2, and this is certainly not scientific, but there is a Twitter account called UNI Confessions that is run by some students at the University of Northern Iowa. They have over 10,000 followers. What you might expect from college kids, retweets about funny stuff, school, sex, homework and so on. Yesterday, they did a survey of their followers on the election. The followers don't have to be students, but of course, the vast majority are. While not impossible to stuff the ballot box, there wouldn't be much double voting. The student body is about 12,000 students, 2/3 female, 90% white, 90% Iowans. Again, I don't know the demographics of the Twitter account, but it probably isn't far from the demographics of the school. Here are your results.
1550 votes, 38% Trump, 31% Johnson, 31% Clinton.
That is amazing to me, that a survey of young people, with half being female, and Clinton came in last of those 3. Doesn't mean those people will actually go out and vote. The key takeaway to me is there no youth enthusiasm for Clinton.
Nate Sliver should be able to sue them for a micro-aggression or something—wawa wawa—where’s my lawyer? ;-)
In north central CT, no Hillary presence at all. I have found maybe 6 Hillary lawn signs in the last month, and I had to visit a very lib section of a nearby lib town to find most of them. I am still seeing more and more Trump lawn signs appear though.
Good info. Thanks.
Dan Rather comes to mind
My Comment # 1 (see below) was the reason I posted the story link at all. Polling memo may likely be a head fake but the part alluding to Clinton field offices being empty of volunteers is correct, at least in my area of north Florida. That was my point.
I can’t vouch for legitimacy of this “leaked Monmouth U polling memo” story BUT, I can vouch for the excerpt regarding field office being empty of volunteers in my area. I drive by the Clinton campaign office here in my North Florida town and there are always six or less people in their headquarters when I drive by. At 6:00 pm night before last I pulled up and stopped in a parking space and could see through the window and the lights were out in the front office. There was a small light in a smaller adjacent room and there were only six people sitting around a table, basically doing nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.