Posted on 02/28/2016 10:38:01 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
To my friends supporting Donald Trump:
The Trump coalition is broad and complicated, but I believe many Trump fans are well-meaning. I have spoken at length with many of you, both inside and outside Nebraska. You are rightly worried about our national direction. You ache about a crony-capitalist leadership class that is not urgent about tackling our crises. You are right to be angry.
I'm as frustrated and saddened as you are about what's happening to our country. But I cannot support Donald Trump.
Please understand: I'm not an establishment Republican, and I will never support Hillary Clinton. I'm a movement conservative who was elected over the objections of the GOP establishment. My current answer for who I would support in a hypothetical matchup between Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton is: Neither of them. I sincerely hope we select one of the other GOP candidates, but if Donald Trump ends up as the GOP nominee, conservatives will need to find a third option.
Mr. Trump's relentless focus is on dividing Americans, and on tearing down rather than building back up this glorious nation. Much like President Obama, he displays essentially no understanding of the fact that, in the American system, we have a constitutional system of checks and balances, with three separate but co-equal branches of government. And the task of public officials is to be public "servants." The law is king, and the people are boss. But have you noticed how Mr. Trump uses the word "Reign" - like he thinks he's running for King? It's creepy, actually. Nebraskans are not looking for a king. We yearn instead for the recovery of a Constitutional Republic.
At this point in Nebraska discussions, many of you have immediately gotten practical: "Okay, fine, you think there are better choices than Trump. But you would certainly still vote for Trump over Clinton in a general election, right?"
Before I explain why my answer is "Neither of them," let me correct some nonsense you might have heard on the internet of late.
WHY I RAN FOR SENATE
***No, I'm not a career politician. (I had never run for anything until being elected to the U.S. Senate fifteen months ago, and I ran precisely because I actually want to make America great again.)
***No, I'm not a lawyer who has never created a job. (I was a business guy before becoming a college president in my hometown.)
***No, I'm not part of the Establishment. (Sheesh, I had attack ads by the lobbyist class run against me while I was on a bus tour doing 16 months of townhalls across Nebraska. Why? Precisely because I was not the preferred candidate of Washington.)
***No, I'm not concerned about political job security. (The very first thing I did upon being sworn in in January 2015 was to introduce a constitutional amendment for term limits - this didnt exactly endear me to my new colleagues.)
***No, I'm not for open borders. (The very first official trip I took in the Senate was to observe and condemn how laughably porous the Texas/Mexican border is. See 70 tweets from @bensasse in February 2015.)
***No, I'm not a "squishy," feel-good, grow-government moderate. (I have the 4th most-conservative voting record in the Senate: Conservative Review Member Profile: Ben Sasse
Heritage Action Scorecare - 95%)
In my very first speech to the Senate, I told my colleagues that "The people despise us all." This institution needs to get to work, not on the lobbyists' priorities, but on the people's: Source
Now, to the question at hand: Will I pledge to vote for just any "Republican" nominee over Hillary Clinton?
Let's begin by rejecting naive purists: Politics has no angels. Politics is not about creating heaven on earth. Politics is simply about preserving a framework for ordered liberty - so that free people can find meaning and happiness not in politics but in their families, their neighborhoods, their work.
POLITICAL PARTIES
Now, let's talk about political parties: parties are just tools to enact the things that we believe. Political parties are not families; they are not religions; they are not nations - they are often not even on the level of sports loyalties. They are just tools. I was not born Republican. I chose this party, for as long as it is useful.
If our Party is no longer working for the things we believe in - like defending the sanctity of life, stopping ObamaCare, protecting the Second Amendment, etc. - then people of good conscience should stop supporting that party until it is reformed.
VOTING
Now, let's talk about voting: Voting is usually just about choosing the lesser evil of the most viable candidates.
"Usually.." But not always. Certain moments are larger. They cause us to explicitly ask: Who are we as a people? What does the way we vote here say about our shared identity? What is actually the presidents job?
THE PRESIDENT'S CORE CALLING
The president's job is not about just mindlessly shouting the word "strong" - as if Vladimir Putin, who has been strongly bombing civilian populations in Syria the last month, is somehow a model for the American presidency. No, the president's core calling is to "Preserve, Protect, and Defend the Constitution."
Before we ever get into any technical policy fights - about pipelines, or marginal tax rates, or term limits, or Medicare reimbursement codes - America is first and fundamentally about a shared Constitutional creed. America is exceptional, because she is at her heart a big, bold truth claim about human dignity, natural rights, and self-control - and therefore necessarily about limited rather than limitless government.
THE MEANING OF AMERICA
America is the most exceptional nation in the history of the world because our Constitution is the best political document that's ever been written. It said something different than almost any other government had said before: Most governments before said that might makes right, that government decides what our rights are and that the people are just dependent subjects. Our Founders said that God gives us rights by nature, and that government is not the author or source of our rights. Government is just our shared project to secure those rights.
Government exists only because the world is fallen, and some people want to take your property, your liberty, and your life. Government is tasked with securing a framework for ordered liberty where "we the people" can in our communities voluntarily build something great together for our kids and grandkids. That's America. Freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of association, freedom of speech - the First Amendment is the heartbeat of the American Constitution, of the American idea itself.
WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT TO MR. TRUMP?
So let me ask you: Do you believe the beating heart of Mr. Trump's candidacy has been a defense of the Constitution? Do you believe it's been an impassioned defense of the First Amendment - or an attack on it?
Which of the following quotes give you great comfort that he's in love with the First Amendment, that he is committed to defending the Constitution, that he believes in executive restraint, that he understands servant leadership?
Statements from Trump:
***"Were going to open up libel laws and we're going to have people sue you like youve never got sued before."
***"When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. They were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak..."
***Putin, who has killed journalists and is pillaging Ukraine, is a great leader.
***The editor of National Review "should not be allowed on TV and the FCC should fine him."
***On whether he will use executive orders to end-run Congress, as President Obama has illegally done: "I won't refuse it. I'm going to do a lot of things." "I mean, he's led the way, to be honest with you."
***"Sixty-eight percent would not leave under any circumstance. I think that means murder. It think it means anything."
***On the internet: "I would certainly be open to closing areas" of it.
***His lawyers to people selling anti-Trump t-shirts: "Mr. Trump considers this to be a very serious matter and has authorized our legal team to take all necessary and appropriate actions to bring an immediate halt..."
***Similar threatening legal letters to competing campaigns running ads about his record.
And on it goes
IF MR. TRUMP BECOMES THE NOMINEE...
Given what we know about him today, here's where I'm at: If Donald Trump becomes the Republican nominee, my expectation is that I will look for some third candidate - a conservative option, a Constitutionalist.
I do not claim to speak for a movement, but I suspect I am far from alone. After listening to Nebraskans in recent weeks, and talking to a great many people who take oaths seriously, I think many are in the same place. I believe a sizable share of Christians - who regard threats against religious liberty as arguably the greatest crisis of our time - are unwilling to support any candidate who does not make a full-throated defense of the First Amendment a first commitment of their candidacy.
Conservatives understand that all men are created equal and made in the image of God, but also that government must be limited so that fallen men do not wield too much power. A presidential candidate who boasts about what he'll do during his "reign" and refuses to condemn the KKK cannot lead a conservative movement in America.
TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT
Thank you for listening. While I recognize that we disagree about how to make America great again, we agree that this should be our goal. We need more people engaged in the civic life of our countrynot fewer. I genuinely appreciate how much many of you care about this country, and that you are demanding something different from Washington. Im going to keep doing the same thing.
But I cant support Donald Trump.
Humbly,
Ben Sasse
Nebraska
You’re correct. Sasse did say he’d support a third party conservative candidate. But isn’t that in effect handing the election to hillary? Isn’t that exactly what the party elite are willing to do?
And protecting the US from foreign invasion is not the primary Constitutional obligation of the President? As Senator Sessions has demonstrated, working with Trump does seem to be the best way to get conservative principles embodied in the changes which will occur.
Using so many words to convince others (and maybe himself), Sasse comes off as a professional concern troll. But I’d expect no less from any party first politician.
The bigger enemy by a thousand fold is the RAT party. Who are their icons but the vulture of Islam Hussein Barack Obama, Bernie sanders the open socialist monster, and Hillary rotten.
Yes, it was a crude post. But we all get tired of this nightly barrage of Trump-hater articles and tempers boil over I guess.
Now, when I see one, I make SURE that I’ve gone over to the daily FR Caucus and have voted for Trump!
“and where was trump during those years...helping the GOPe...creating the environment where corker/alexander/mconnell/schumer got things done”
Doing just like the rest of us who were giving what they could to get the so-called “Republican” party to hear us while living our daily lives. Some had and still have more resources than others and gave more hoping to sway any politician. All others could do was make phone calls and write letters.
He finally realized that was not working, just like so many of us. We tried Tea Party and then when that was co-opted, went rogue. Trump has stated numerous times the reason he got in was for the same reason that we went rogue in saying the hell with it, I’ll just spend the money to try it myself.
There is nothing more complicated about it than that.
Look at statements from Obama:
If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor.
Nobody is more ticked off about these charges that the IRS is targeting conservatives.
The movie caused reasonable people to kill 4 Americans in Benghazi.
We will get to the bottom of this scandal.
My point: talk is cheap. We need to judge people on their ACTIONS not on what they say.””
And the RAT party has their opponents at each other’s throats while the vulture of Islam sits in the most powerful position in the world. He is the common enemy, not republican opponents. Voting records tell the story.
I think you are onto the situation.
I suppose you would support Mark Kirk, Thad Cochran, Mitch McConnell, Scott Brown, Romney, and any other “electable” Republican the GOPe tells you to vote for.
That is the problem.
Well wifey, it's clear that you have found your savior and your next political suicidal venture.
Good luck with ben's asse, and his conservative option a Constipated Unicorn.
When you make that decision, maybe Jim will send you to FReeper Limbo, for about 10 years.
So, did Sasse and Cruzbio firm a coalition to stop the Corker Bill?
No. They voted for it.
Did Sasse and Cruzbio form a coalition to stop TPP?
No. They voted for it.
Did Sasse support his “buddy” Ted Cruz by attending a hearing designed to stop “global warming”?
Nope. Skipped it.
Did Sasse vote for McConnell as Majority Leader?
Yep.
And THIS GUY is going to give advice on being a “conservative”?
I guess you missed all the Republicans who fought the good fight
The ones part of the Gang Of Eight (Rubio)? The ones investigating Benghazi? The ones who ran on shrinking .gov spending? et;al.
Those Republicans? I've been voting for them since 1976 on the belief that one of them would have the integrity to keep his word. I'm voting for Trump. He gets things done. He has a proven track record of doing so.
Show me where the other two have done the same.
Ed
But I cannot support Donald Trump>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Wrong.
Trump is the US equivalent of Winston Churchill. He has about him a grim determination to put America back on track , for it has been derailed by nationalist socialists, in particular the Obama movement which has made it a policy to violate the Constitution.
This was pedicted:
Read it here if you do not believe, a historical analysis:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html
We do not need an “in the box” political hack as president. We need a great citizen who is strong and grimly determined the way Trump is.The People are about to recreate America, YET AGAIN.
Can you imagine, we have Czars who report the political ideology of our various civil servants and military personnel back to Obama. They are treated accordingly as to their ideology rather than job performance.We need Trump very badly, no one else will do.
Yep!
When scottwalker quit, I axed, no begged and pleaded with you not to get on the Cruz-Mobile, but you couldn't he'p yourself, and NOW LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE!!
Witchy Woman.
Another politico seduced by the trappings of power. He went to do good, but instead ended up doing very well. It’s a time of choosing, and he chooses to stay on the gravy train just a little longer.
He can preach to someone else - there might be a few who will listen to this "paragon of humility".
She’s the golum of FReeperdom. Used to be a rabid Walker supporter. She’s found a new precious.
...um...they just passed another 2 trillion dollar budget. What you think the tea party people are doing isn’t actually working. This is what we mean when we say all talk and no action (results)
Blah, blah, blah. Rambling screed.
“but I believe many Trump fans are well-meaning.”
What an arrogant, condescending prick. Has he ever had a real job in his life, or has he been ensconsed in academia his entire life? Jerk.
We don’t care what he or his elite ilk think. We want to destroy the GOP PTB in DC. Trump is the only one who can do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.