Skip to comments.
Having sex with 21 women saves you from prostate cancer
helpmeoutdoc.com ^
| 28 October 2014
| Daniel Tomas on
Posted on 10/28/2014 12:58:36 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Having an impressive love-making record may protect you against prostate cancer, as new evidence from Canadian scientists suggests.
According to new research published by the University of Montreal, men having sex with more than 20 women, have a 29% lower chance of developing prostate cancer, as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men.
(Excerpt) Read more at helpmeoutdoc.com ...
TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: buddypalmerworks; cancer; prostate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
To: BenLurkin
would that work if a man had sex with his own wife 21 times ???
To: BenLurkin
So a physical cancer or a moral one, how special.
42
posted on
10/28/2014 1:15:04 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: tophat9000
So is the cost of whores covered 100% under Obamacare as preventive health?
43
posted on
10/28/2014 1:15:32 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
(An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
To: PGR88
44
posted on
10/28/2014 1:15:45 PM PDT
by
Politicalkiddo
(Our obligations to our country never cease but with our lives.- John Adams)
To: BenLurkin
"men having sex with more than 20 women, have a 29% lower chance of developing prostate cancer, as opposed to men who have gone through 20 similar sexual experiences with other men." And a 100% lower chance of catching AIDS.
45
posted on
10/28/2014 1:15:50 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(I'M WITH CRUZ!)
To: Yo-Yo
“(or so my wife said...) “
My wife said, “Sex with less than 20 or sex with more than 20...both will get you killed, so I guess yer screwed.”
46
posted on
10/28/2014 1:16:01 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
To: RightOnTheBorder
If it was the frequency of sexual activity, the sex of the object wouldn’t matter, which it apparently did.
47
posted on
10/28/2014 1:16:32 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(I am not tense. I am very, very alert.)
To: BenLurkin
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
48
posted on
10/28/2014 1:17:01 PM PDT
by
csmusaret
(Will remove Obama-Biden bumperstickers for $10)
To: BenLurkin
I am sure that this would keep me from getting prostate cancer, because my wife of 27 years would KILL ME before I had a chance to develop cancer!
But, hey, if I can get my doctor to sign off on a prescription for this, I “might” be able to sell her on it!
49
posted on
10/28/2014 1:17:01 PM PDT
by
ExTxMarine
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
To: BenLurkin
Hey, I hear tell from some Africans that having sex with a virgin cures AIDS. So, there ya go.
To: BenLurkin
Uh... just one question: How does the prostate know you slept with 21 different women versus one woman 21 times?
To: BenLurkin
actually, I’m feeling a little envious of these men with the lower risk of prostate cancer.
52
posted on
10/28/2014 1:18:51 PM PDT
by
MNDude
To: KC_Lion
Good news for you and Steve!
53
posted on
10/28/2014 1:18:54 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(It took Democrats four hours to deport Elian Gonzalez)
To: BenLurkin
I'll get right on that!
54
posted on
10/28/2014 1:19:26 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: servo1969
Does this inoculate shahids in the next life?
55
posted on
10/28/2014 1:19:54 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(I'M WITH CRUZ!)
To: BenLurkin
If men having sex with burros were correlated with more prostate cancer than sex with men, I suppose they'd report it, "Having sex with 21 men saves you from prostate cancer."
Nonsense.
Besides they said if they had "similar sexual experiences." Does that mean the control group of men was having anal sex with women?
I don't even like to type such things. Ick. I think I'll go wash my hands.
56
posted on
10/28/2014 1:20:01 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite.)
To: NorthstarMom
57
posted on
10/28/2014 1:21:06 PM PDT
by
Johnny_cash
(10 out of 10 idiots voted for 0Bama!)
To: Common Sense 101
"Keep 'em healthy boys!"
58
posted on
10/28/2014 1:21:10 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(I'M WITH CRUZ!)
To: Kegger
Every thirteen year old boy knows that women are not necessary for that to happen.
59
posted on
10/28/2014 1:22:23 PM PDT
by
Vermont Lt
(Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
To: BenLurkin
Why 21? Why not 42? It’s the universal number.
60
posted on
10/28/2014 1:22:31 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson