Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to tell real whiskey from fake -- faster
http://www.physorg.com ^ | July 25, 2011 | Provided by University of Strathclyde

Posted on 07/25/2011 10:38:33 AM PDT by Red Badger

Methods for distinguishing between authentic and counterfeit Scotch whisky brands have been devised by scientists at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow.

Researchers from the Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry have found new ways to compare the content of whisky samples to determine if they are the whisky on the label or an imitation brand.

A series of blind tests successfully put the real whisky brand and the fakes in the right categories. The system could enhance the technology industry uses to tackle the trade in illicit whisky, which costs huge sums in lost revenue and threatens brand reputation.

Professor David Littlejohn, who led the research, said: "The whisky industry has tools at its disposal for telling authentic and counterfeit whisky brands apart but many of them involve lab-based analysis, which isn't always the most convenient system if a sample needs to be identified quickly.

"There's a growing need for methods that can provide simpler and faster identification and we have developed a system which could be adapted for devices to use on site, without the need to return samples to a lab. It could be of great benefit to an industry which is hugely important to the economy."

The researchers analysed 17 samples of blended whisky, looking at the concentration of ethanol in the samples without diluting them and the residue of dried whisky. They did so with mid-infrared spectrometry, used with immersion probes that incorporate novel optical fibres developed by Scottish based company Fibre Photonics Ltd, who co-sponsored the research. The procedures developed can provide prompt, accurate analysis without the complexity and cost of some other systems.

The levels of ethanol and colourant led them to identify correctly the eight authentic and nine counterfeit samples.

The project research paper has been published in Analytica Chimica Acta.


TOPICS: Food; Science
KEYWORDS: alcohol; beverage; scotch; whiskey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: no gnu taxes
You’d be surprised what they still make.

Oh, indeed. "Old Overholt" rye whiskey is still around. Owned by one of the big distilling conglomerates I'm sure. I think Hemingway referred to it as "Old Overcoat" or some such.

The funny part about the Old Crow product is the "Reserve" labeling. As if letting that stuff sit in the barrel for an extra month or two is really going to improve it. ;-)

61 posted on 07/25/2011 1:24:13 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Once you try ‘Laphroaigh’ you will say Glen Who?

Laphroig tastes like a burning hospital would smell - but in a good way!

62 posted on 07/25/2011 1:28:59 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Scotch must be a terrible whiskey. It sits around in barrels for years and years before anybody buys it.

"Bartender! Give me some fresh scotch!"

63 posted on 07/25/2011 1:36:09 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Obama and the Dems - The flash mob raiding the Treasury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logic n' Reason

If you knew anything about Scotland’s history, you’d know of the historical animosity against the Catholic church there.

I can afford better whisky than Dewar’s blended nonsense. I drink only genuine single malt, and when I can obtain it, I get it at cask strength.


64 posted on 07/25/2011 1:38:43 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
They say this stuff is pretty decent.

You used to be able to get a bottle for a mere $38,000, but it's all sold out now.

65 posted on 07/25/2011 1:42:46 PM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-Free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: deoetdoctrinae

Excellent choice.


66 posted on 07/25/2011 1:44:50 PM PDT by seoul62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
Good for you, I guess.

Go in peace, FRiend.

67 posted on 07/25/2011 1:51:35 PM PDT by Logic n' Reason (The stain must be REMOVED (ERADICATED)....NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Old Crow is one of the best whiskeys around for the money. Jack Daniels tastes like turpentine mixed with quinine and it’s supposed to be a premium whiskey


68 posted on 07/25/2011 1:54:45 PM PDT by no gnu taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
In my experience, the term “quality blended whisk[e]y” is an oxymoron. White Label is better than most, certainly, but the whole point of drinking whisky in the first place is to be drinking something that is unique, and not homogenized for mass consumption.

A popular opinion, to be sure. There are very high-quality whiskies coming onto the market, both blends (malt and grain whiskies) and vatted/pure malts (multiple single malts combined for effect). Compass Box is one such independnet bottler that specializes in this. I'd opt for a bottle of their "Spice Tree" over JW Black any day.

69 posted on 07/25/2011 1:55:44 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow

There can be such a thing as “aging scotch too long.”

Among single malt drinkers, there is some agreement that keeping it a barrel for more than, oh, 15 to 18 years doesn’t impart anything good to the flavor, and can actually be detrimental to the flavor.

Depending on the barrels and whisky in question, anywhere between eight and 15 years yields the best results.

What isn’t commonly known among whisky drinkers is that many of the casks the whisky is aged in are American oak barrels, formerly used for bourbon.


70 posted on 07/25/2011 2:03:06 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: no gnu taxes

My uncle always kept a bottle of Old Crow in the pantry. It definitely had more flavor than Old No. 7 (which I really don’t care for at all), but I recall it being fairly harsh. The recent repackaging in those flexible plastic bottles hasn’t really led me to think that it may have improved, either. I concede that I may be mistaken.


71 posted on 07/25/2011 2:04:25 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: no gnu taxes

One other thing - only people who haven’t tasted many whiskies would mistake Jack Daniel’s basic offering as anything “premium”. Shows you what the power of marketing can do.


72 posted on 07/25/2011 2:07:33 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I’ll have to give it a look.

To my tongue, the Dewar’s stuff just lacks any of the regional character I really like in malt whisky. I’m not saying that good malt whisky has to have some pronounced character like the heavy peat smoke of the Islays or something similar that just smacks you across the face with how unique it is. It’s just that the whole blending deal seems to try to remove any identifiable regional character and create a “budweiser” effect of year-after-year consistent same-ness that just... I dunno.... it’s bothersome.

If I wanted boring uniformity, I’d drink vodka I guess.

I’ve had many good grain whiskeys from here in North America, so I’m not “grain whiskey shall never pass my lips” snob. I just don’t like supporting mass mediocrity as a business plan, and that’s what so many of these blends come off as to me.


73 posted on 07/25/2011 2:10:59 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I’m in complete agreement there.


74 posted on 07/25/2011 2:11:59 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

If you ever feel like splurging on something really unique, look at the Compass Box “Hedonism”. It’s a blend of scottish “grain” whiskies, aged separately and then combined. Not a drop of barley-based liquor in it.


75 posted on 07/25/2011 2:24:59 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

I test for quality and originality a couple times a week. Funny, but my usual outcome is “Yeah, that’s pretty darned good”...


76 posted on 07/25/2011 2:43:24 PM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
My uncle always kept a bottle of Old Crow in the pantry. It definitely had more flavor than Old No. 7 (which I really don’t care for at all), but I recall it being fairly harsh.

Yes, it's harsh but less so than Jack Daniels at half the price.

77 posted on 07/25/2011 3:20:08 PM PDT by no gnu taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: fredhead
Ah, yeah, them corn squeezins' will make you forget about those other whiskies (and your home address, your name, families members names...)

CC

78 posted on 09/15/2011 10:21:59 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Wisdom comes from experience. Experience comes from a lack of wisdom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson