Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Martel

I’ll have to give it a look.

To my tongue, the Dewar’s stuff just lacks any of the regional character I really like in malt whisky. I’m not saying that good malt whisky has to have some pronounced character like the heavy peat smoke of the Islays or something similar that just smacks you across the face with how unique it is. It’s just that the whole blending deal seems to try to remove any identifiable regional character and create a “budweiser” effect of year-after-year consistent same-ness that just... I dunno.... it’s bothersome.

If I wanted boring uniformity, I’d drink vodka I guess.

I’ve had many good grain whiskeys from here in North America, so I’m not “grain whiskey shall never pass my lips” snob. I just don’t like supporting mass mediocrity as a business plan, and that’s what so many of these blends come off as to me.


73 posted on 07/25/2011 2:10:59 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave

If you ever feel like splurging on something really unique, look at the Compass Box “Hedonism”. It’s a blend of scottish “grain” whiskies, aged separately and then combined. Not a drop of barley-based liquor in it.


75 posted on 07/25/2011 2:24:59 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson