Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Sarah Palin Will Be President
5/26/11 | typical_whitey

Posted on 05/26/2011 6:13:04 PM PDT by Typical_Whitey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Typical_Whitey

Wishful thinking can be close to delusion. Ain’t going to happen. Too many Republicans are turned off totally by her - mostly among female R voters. The question I think about is who is the most conservative candidate who realistically could get 51% of the NATIONAL vote/electors?


21 posted on 05/26/2011 7:16:38 PM PDT by JustTheTruth (Sometimes the Truth hurts so much that the masses refuse to face or accept the obvious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

Thank you for this pic - it’s my favorite of the greatest president of the 20th century, Ronald Reagan. I still get teary-eyed when I think of how proud and strong our beloved United States of America was when he was in the White House.


22 posted on 05/26/2011 7:19:09 PM PDT by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Obama is beatable, but not by Sarah Palin. She is not electable...her negatives are too high, her speeches are about as annoying as Obama’s and the liberal media will bludgeon her to a pulp, should she run.
Face it, game over before it gets started.
23 posted on 05/26/2011 7:24:12 PM PDT by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

bttt


24 posted on 05/26/2011 7:34:55 PM PDT by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now, and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette

I think that he would endorse Sarah Palin. He is her hero also.


25 posted on 05/26/2011 7:42:43 PM PDT by RedMDer (restoration of our honor, dignity, and freedoms will save America. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"Um, you didn’t actually explain why Sarah Palin will be president."

Dozens of FreeRepublic's finest have explained this to you over and over for the last year. If you haven't grasped it yet, you probably aren't going to. Don't be fooled by Whitey's last sentence, about why Palin should "run." In the first three paragraphs, he lays out why she'll win.

You're apparently just too thick to get it. But don't feel bad... everyone can't be bright and clear-thinking, with good powers of observation and retention. The world needs ditch-diggers, too!

8^D

26 posted on 05/26/2011 8:09:04 PM PDT by Gargantua (Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval" ©2010 by Gargantua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

Our Lady of Wasilla

Pray for us who have recourse to thee


27 posted on 05/26/2011 8:31:14 PM PDT by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

I really think she wont even run(really run like file paperwork), I am more convinced NOW than ever. I will even say I think mostly everyone else is wrong on this, every once in a while I get to do that, this is one of them.


28 posted on 05/26/2011 8:36:38 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Typical_Whitey

You make a case for how horrible Obama is, and then you say that if the conservative base doesn’t get the candidate that they want, they’ll go off in a huff and let Obama win again. You can’t have it both ways. Either people really understand that Obama is a disaster for this country and will support any reasonable candidate who runs against him or they don’t realize that he’s a disaster and will not rally around his opposition. By your own words, conservatives don’t see Obama as a big enough disaster to rally around anyone who doesn’t pass their every litmus test. If that’s the case, you can’t expect independents to rally around Sarah Palin.


29 posted on 05/26/2011 10:00:02 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
I like her. I admire her. She has truly Americans' interests at heart and expresses them loud and clear. Yet I can't say that I would vote for her. I can't stand her shrill speech delivery. I feel that if she were truly interested in being President she would have spent more in-depth study into what the job involves and worked on her public image a little more. Although I do appreciate her naturalness and fresh approach to the country's problems, I have the feeling that she is listening too much to the man who loves her the way she is and not paying much attention to what influences the American public.
30 posted on 05/26/2011 10:11:40 PM PDT by imme09
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
I know quite a few of the above that voted George W. Bush twice, and even a few that went McCain, but that go out of their way (without prompting) to mention how much they hate Sarah Palin.

I don't know anybody who voted for Bush and McCain who likes Obama better than Palin.

31 posted on 05/26/2011 10:20:25 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Save it, spammer!


32 posted on 05/26/2011 10:22:00 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: imme09
RE :”I like her. I admire her. She has truly Americans’ interests at heart and expresses them loud and clear. Yet I can't say that I would vote for her. I can't stand her shrill speech delivery. I feel that if she were truly interested in being President she would have spent more in-depth study into what the job involves and worked on her public image a little more.

Have you been posting these thoughts here before? If yes what type of response do you get? LOL

I don't think she is running, I think she is playing the media with all this planned stuff, in fact I'd be willing to bet on it now. This is another one of those cases where I read between the lines. I easily predicted correctly Trump was NOT running.

33 posted on 05/26/2011 10:22:48 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Celerity
I have little to nothing in the fund (I’m 34 and have no SS benefits) so I can easily say “Away with them!”.

And I'm 64 and am in line to get somewhere between $1878 and $3282 per month, depending on when I choose to retire. But I'd happily cancel the whole thing in return for repealing the 16th and, in the same instrument, forcing all levels of government to rely on consumption taxes.

34 posted on 05/26/2011 10:35:03 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WFTR

Yes, but I think I stressed many times that it is key to teaching the American public exactly what Obama and Democrats policies are doing to this country. The media is championing Obama policies and doesn’t report the failure. Doing nothing about entitlement spending is going to destroy this country but the American people by and large don’t understand that, if they did my point would be moot and you would be right, anyone other then Obama would win.

Democrats have set a narrative in stone with the vast majority of their supporters and that is that the rich should be paying for and taking care of all this funding for entitlements ie., in NY-26 the Rats ran an add that a “Republican” pushed granny off the cliff literally, all the while the Democrat in the race left the impression that doing nothing would be just fine, hell Obama himself has basically said the same a social compact, right to, entitled to, your benefits... those words are destroying America and are exactly what Tytler warned about in the quote....


35 posted on 05/27/2011 9:59:50 AM PDT by Typical_Whitey (Bibi to Obama: "History will not give the Jewish people another chance")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
The basic problem is that everyone's opinion of Palin is basically formed and set. It's hard to change those.

It's only hard if you haven't actually tried, and for now, Sarah has yet to begin working on changing the minds of those Americans who've been unduly influenced by the slanders of the leftstream press, et al.

Once her campaign begins, I believe a sort of snowball effect will take hold, as her legions of supporters begin openly showing their support for her candidacy. As more on the right begin to see that she's the inevitable nominee, all sorts of forces will begin to align themselves with her, and behind her. The total effect will be galvanic and infectious.

Naturally, Sarah herself will be the central force which fuels all of this, and it is her relentless message of American Promise and Greatness that will reawaken the hope that so many have seen shattered under Obama.

When Sarah is out front and center delivering her message directly to the people every day, I predict that many who do not now consider her to be a serious contender, or to have much chance of winning the nomination (or the general), will change their minds.

It's going to take a lot of work on her part, but if there's anyone who's up to the task, it's Sarah Palin.

36 posted on 05/27/2011 8:41:29 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
The big issue is how you get all the independents and swing Democrats to un-completely-and-totally-hate-with-utter-contempt Sarah Palin.

Care to back up that assertion with some type of proof?

Bet you can't!

Also, just remember that Ronald Reagan was more than 30% behind Carter less than a year before the general election and the press were vicious and lying against him too.
37 posted on 07/17/2011 12:45:42 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
The big issue is how you get all the independents and swing Democrats to un-completely-and-totally-hate-with-utter-contempt Sarah Palin.

Care to back up that assertion with some type of proof?

Bet you can't!

Also, just remember that Ronald Reagan was more than 30% behind Carter less than a year before the general election and the press were vicious and lying against him too.
38 posted on 07/17/2011 12:45:52 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson