Posted on 04/28/2011 10:03:29 AM PDT by DCBurgess58
Lots of people have been discussing the subject of the layers found within President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate. What I haven't really heard discussed yet is the easiliest seen and most damning problem with the document. It contains mixed pixel sizes, clearly visable to anyone by merely zooming in on the PDF in Adobe Reader. First off, let's download the document from the White House.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
Once you have downloaded the PDF, follow my instructions for examining it. Some of you may choose to close your eyes to this and not try... But all who do will be in for a shock... You can come to your own conclusions but the truth is unavoidable once you see what I have found.
First off, left click on the PDF to see the full Birth Certificate form as provided by the White House.
Find the part in the upper right hand side, where it says DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and has the numbers 61 10641 written underneath...
Using the Adobe PDF reader, click on the 1600% magnification and look a the numbers 10641...
Check out the number one on the right hand side... notice how pixelated it is? Notice also that it is made up of a bunch of different colors!!! Now get a good feeling for the size of the individual pixels that make up this number...
Now take a look at any of the numbers to the left of the one, notice they are all one color only? More importantly than that, there are numerous places on all the other numbers where you can clearly see how large the size of a single pixel is. The pixals in all the other numbers are only one quarter the size of the pixels in the one on the right hand side.
If you scan a document, the whole document will be made up of identical sized pixels... If this document was real, it would be made up of identical sized pixals...
BUT IT'S NOT!!!
Okay, now zoom the PDF out to where the whole Birth Certificate is visable. Now, left click once on the image and it will go blue... right click and select Copy Image... Now open up Microsoft Paint, Corel Paint Shop or whatever other imaging program you use and paste the image in the program... The basic background of the form is there but almost all of the written data is gone.... What the heck??? Where did all the writing go? There is just white shadowing where the words were.
When you copied the document, the layer with the smaller pixels was NOT coped... That's why you don't see it when you paste the document in an imager... Also notice that the number one on the right hand side did appear in the pasted form. That's because it was the same pixel size as the background form of the document. Now finally, Why is there a white shadow left where the missing text and numbers used to be? Because it was an intentional forgery, they took the time to alter the background of the text and numbers, so that the characters would look realistic... but they screwed up on matching the pixel size of the overlaying text!!!
Finally, remember... I didn't make this PDF... You just downloaded it from the White House!!! GAME... SET... MATCH!!!
As it did in other areas - the 'p' in triplet, the 'R' in Barack, etc. - that make no sense in forging.
It's not a straight scan - the background of the scan has been removed and replaced with the security pattern. There's been too much post processing done to make hard judgements here. If the whole thing had just been a photo, photocopy or straight scan, it would be different and easier, but it's not.
Given her and her parents Marxist background, I would think that any “baptism” would be a non-starter.
I’m amazed at the conspiracy theorists. Don’t forget government officials in Hawaii would have to be complicit in any forgery, too. I suppose other conspirators made up the birth announcements in the newspapers, and everyone in the administration is in on the lie. So many people conspiring to fool us, yet somehow they’ve managed to keep it all secret. They can’t stop WikiLeaks, but they can keep the lid on Obama’s birth certificate conspiracy?!? Yeah, it boggles my mind how people buy into this crap.
As to the document itself, some FReepers have duplicated similar effects, layers and pixels, by scanning documents and converting them to PDF with OCR. The easiest explanation is usually the right one. Yet, all it takes is someone to raise the slightest doubt, and some people automatically assume the worst and most improbable explanation.
The document is almost certainly legit, and frankly, it’s irrelevant at this point anyway. Even if it was a forgery, does anyone think #1 it can be proven conclusively and #2 a sitting president is going to be impeached over it?
.
And THAT is the real issue, and what they have been trying to hide all along.
Barry is just as LEGAL as all the other people that were brought in through Hawaii, and oddly his grandma was a commie who worked in a department where she could facilitate this process.
So, we have an entire STATE and all of it's elected officials and retired officials who are protecting their very own livelihood and freedom. That would explain entirely the whole fiasco of Obama's BC question.
Carried to the extreme, this may be true, however, in practice it rarely happens. This explanation falls apart totally when you examine the text. The character outlines are terrible. This would not happen if OCR were recognizing these as text characters. The OCR would correct any flaws in the outlines. The quality of the text characters indicate that OCR was not an element involved in the scanning of this document.
African means?? There's plenty of white folks who are african. They're just not black.
AFRICAN IS NOT A RACE!!!
The place to really examine closer is the signature, (Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama. The pixels for “(Stanley) Ann D” are one size. The pixels for “unham Obama” are the smaller size. The two following signatures are also large pixels while the dates associated with them are small pixels.
I just took a page from one of my pdf files, went up to 1600 and NONE of the same letters are shown the same way. The pixel locations for every A through Y are all different. (No Z's used)
And Adobe 'recently' made a change to their product too. For years I had to make a pdf copy of my Engineering Drawings and I always used Arial Font as my default font on my AutoCAD drawings, with NO problems when making a pdf copy. Then all of a sudden (back in 08) it wouldn't recognize any numbers in Arial font. I had to change my default AutoCAD font from 'Arial' to 'Arial Unicode MS' for Adobe to recognize it and print it as shown in my original drawing.
Considering all the above, I don't think anything 'proves' this BC is a fraud.
However it does prove a couple other things, One - his mother was only 18 and Two - Daddy wasn't a US Citizen. But it's Mommy's age that gives Barry his real problem per Title 8 of the US Code which was in effect at the time. But that's for another day (and thread).
1) Someone should check in Seattle church archives for a baptismal certificate there since Obummer flew there with his mother- probably too soon after birth [2 weeks too early to have him baptized in Hawaii?]
2) A birth certificate is required for a baptismal certificate and also for required dpt immunization shots in Seattle at that time, i.e., 2 months after birth. Should be in a hospital record in Seattle.
I am sending this to the WA State Freeper group for possible follow-up
Thanks
I saw nationality - Kenya. Not race. Nationality should be correct. It’s your citizenship, not your ethnicity.
It’s possibly the result of some aborted OCR process.
I ran the AP version through an OCR app with “searchable PDF” optioned.
99% came through as searchable text. Including ALL of the rubber stamps.
That must be some pretty cheesy all in one type printer/scanner/fax that created the mess the White House posted.
Is anybody asking why Gov. Abercrombie lied about not being about to find the BC?
You will never win. This is just like the missile/contrail controversy (in fact I bet there is a huge overlap between missile believers and long-form doubters). After a certain point nothing matters and whatever you say is just part of the conspiracy.Heh. Yeah, I guess so. But I don’t blame them. I understand very well that it must be startling to find these layers in the PDF of the scan, if you are not familiar with the compression technique. We all know layers from Photoshop, after all…and everybody knows what Photoshop is used for. Also, people must be disappointed that there is absolutely nothing interesting on that birth certificate. I had been very curious myself about it, and now this. Oh well.
Now let’s see the academic records :-)
obama was a grifter and skirt chaser, not to mention unapologetic bigamist. Wives in Kenya...and wife in “Philippines?” And maybe another in Cambridge?
I don't see any indication he or Ann went back to Kenya in 1961, he didn't have 2 dimes to rub together
he did need an excuse to extend his visa, such as an American “wife” and child. Sounds very much like a sham marriage to extend his visa.
Some Unitarian group was all mixed up in this guy's “sponsorship” - that ties obama in with the Dunhams He lists his citizenship as "British" in several of the documents His address at the time of baby obama II's purported birth does NOT match the birth announcement Toot posted, nor do the Dunham addresses.
Why should he care about ratings?
Your pic is exactly what I ended up with.
Well, you can't leave that hanging...
GIVE MAN!!
I think the next move now is just to get a ruling on what Natural born citizen meant to our founding fathers. He gave us another bogus Birth certificate, so we know how low he will go. But, in the same hand he actually stated to the world that yes, this is my birth certificate.
We never got that with the fightthesmears and what ever the other site was called - it was all 2nd hand statements from others that had seen, held, and verified it. BO never admitted it!
Now, BO Sr. is on this certificate - lets fight the natural born citizen clause. That is if we haven’t already lost all our court judges to this clown! Keep him off the ballot for 2012!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.