Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stonehenge Built With Balls? New experiment suggests monumental stones could have rolled on rails
National Geographic News ^ | Friday, December 10, 2010 | Kate Ravilious

Posted on 12/30/2010 3:10:25 AM PST by SunkenCiv

It's one of Stonehenge's greatest mysteries: How did Stone Age Britons move 45-ton slabs across dozens of miles to create the 4,500-year-old stone circle?

...A previous theory suggested that the builders used wooden rollers -- carved tree trunks laid side by side on a constructed hard surface. Another imagined huge wooden sleds atop greased wooden rails.

But critics say the rollers' hard pathway would have left telltale gouges in the landscape, which have never been found. And the sled system, while plausible, would have required huge amounts of manpower -- hundreds of men at a time to move one of the largest Stonehenge stones, according to a 1997 study.

Andrew Young, though, says Stonehenge's slabs, may have been rolled over a series of balls lined up in grooved rails, according to a November 30 statement from Exeter University in the U.K., where Young is a doctoral student in biosciences.

Young first came up with the ball bearings idea when he noticed that carved stone balls were often found near Neolithic stone circles in Aberdeenshire, Scotland.

"I measured and weighed a number of these stone balls and realized that they are all precisely the same size -- around 70 millimeters [3 inches] in diameter -- which made me think they must have been made to be used in unison, rather than alone," he told National Geographic News.

The balls, Young admitted, have been found near stone circles only in Aberdeenshire and the Orkney Islands -- not on Stonehenge's Salisbury Plain.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: archaeoastronomy; bluestones; godsgravesglyphs; megaliths; preseli; preselihills; stonehenge; unitedkingdom; wiltshire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

In before the anachronistic fantasies.
U.K. archaeology students attempt to prove a rail-and-ball system could have moved Stonehenge stones. [Photograph courtesy University of Exeter]

Stonehenge Built With Balls?

1 posted on 12/30/2010 3:10:30 AM PST by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1010RD; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...

· GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach ·
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
 Antiquity Journal
 & archive
 Archaeologica
 Archaeology
 Archaeology Channel
 BAR
 Bronze Age Forum
 Discover
 Dogpile
 Eurekalert
 Google
 LiveScience
 Mirabilis.ca
 Nat Geographic
 PhysOrg
 Science Daily
 Science News
 Texas AM
 Yahoo
 Excerpt, or Link only?
 


To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
 

· History topic · history keyword · archaeology keyword · paleontology keyword ·
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword ·


2 posted on 12/30/2010 3:12:18 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“Wyngardium Leviosa!”


3 posted on 12/30/2010 3:18:10 AM PST by CholeraJoe (Eat moer DUCK! War Eagle!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Levitation....everyone knows thats how Stoneburg was built.

Obviously remnants of an ancient and highly evolved civilization.


4 posted on 12/30/2010 3:26:29 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus - Domari Nolo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff
Photograph courtesy Crown Copyright, National Monuments Record
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff
Photograph by Andrew Henderson
Photograph by Andrew Henderson
Photograph by Andrew Henderson
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff; photographed at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff; photographed at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff; photographed at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum B.C. with metalworking tools, a quiver of fine arrows. What brought him to within a few miles of Stonehenge at its height? Another mystery.
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff; photographed at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff; photographed at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum
Photograph by Jason Hawkes
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff
Photograph by British Geological Survey/NERC
Photograph by Andrew Henderson [http://pictopia.com/perl/ptp/natgeo?photo_name=1162528]
Photograph by Andrew Henderson [http://pictopia.com/perl/ptp/natgeo?photo_name=1162529]
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff
Photograph by Ken Geiger, National Geographic staff
If the Stones Could Speak: Searching for the meaning of Stonehenge [National Geographic Society]

5 posted on 12/30/2010 3:31:43 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Okay, I had to look that up — you’re number two in the search hit results! :’)


6 posted on 12/30/2010 3:33:07 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

:’)


7 posted on 12/30/2010 3:43:31 AM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe; SunkenCiv; xsmommy; neverdem; cogitator
“Wyngardium Leviosa!”

And that only got a Nbr 3 ranking?

8 posted on 12/30/2010 3:50:31 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The idea sounds neat, inventive, practical, do-able.

Makes sense. And the rocks would not be discarded after one use in one place. At 3 inch diameter, the priests/builders/foreman/stonecutters would simply find it easy to just pick them all up and take them to the next site.


9 posted on 12/30/2010 3:52:47 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Wow. Those ancient British had big stones, didn’t they?


10 posted on 12/30/2010 4:08:31 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Probably to make up for their bad teeth.


11 posted on 12/30/2010 4:25:21 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Aye it took balls. Large brass ones laddie.

and ample free time and ale


12 posted on 12/30/2010 4:55:27 AM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Sorry, but I'm sticking with the "Aliens" theory...

I love these threads. Thanks for the post!

13 posted on 12/30/2010 4:56:09 AM PST by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The History Channel said it was built with alien technology, so, you know, it’s gotta be true.


14 posted on 12/30/2010 5:18:49 AM PST by kingpins10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/south_west/4123764.stm

Is there any possibility that there is a stone quarry UNDERNEATH Stonehenge?

It would have been possible to remove the dirt and leave the stones exposed in the formation.

I still believe it was physically impossible for humans to drag those monsters 240 miles - without a thousand dray horses on rotating shifts.


15 posted on 12/30/2010 5:23:38 AM PST by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God 's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

http://www.sacred-destinations.com/england/stonehenge

That’s just silly!!!!


16 posted on 12/30/2010 5:38:09 AM PST by sodpoodle (Despair; man's surrender. Laughter; God 's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Andrew Young, though, says Stonehenge's slabs, may have been rolled over a series of balls lined up in grooved rails, according to a November 30 statement from Exeter University in the U.K., where Young is a doctoral student in biosciences.

I bet he's related to Angus Young of AC/DC...

17 posted on 12/30/2010 5:50:15 AM PST by JRios1968 (This is me, in a nutshell: "Let me out of here...I'm trapped in a nutshell!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

What did they use for high tensile strength rope?
With perfectly round bearings and straight grooves they would hit soft spots in the earth.
How many pushers could be engaged?
My guess is that it would tend to nose down and need to be pulled out?


18 posted on 12/30/2010 6:01:23 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

What? These college students think women provided the horsepower?


19 posted on 12/30/2010 6:15:46 AM PST by Bigg Red (Palin/Hunter 2012 -- Bolton their Secretary of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle
I still believe it was physically impossible for humans to drag those monsters 240 miles - without a thousand dray horses on rotating shifts.

Lots of things are possible -- with enough people over a long-enough time frame.

As an alternate possibility, how cold might British winters been at the time? Instead of stone balls, could they have poured water along the path, had it freeze, and had a huge party at the winter solstice, moving the stones a couple of miles every year until they were done?

20 posted on 12/30/2010 6:25:04 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson