Posted on 10/16/2010 1:54:00 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
On right now. O'Donnell still winning. :)
Linky?
Hate to give ‘em any viewer stats - but I haven’t seen the debate yet...;) How do they measure viewer stats these days - surveys? I know in the past Nielsen used to use set top measures...
It’s on the network, on TV. Not sure they stream live.
O’Donnell just lambasted Coons for saying he became a democrat because of what he learned from a Marxist professor.
Homerun. She’s very good. No wonder she’s getting the full-on Palin treatment.
“Linky?”
CNN (on TV)
I believe they use this formula:
Liberal Agenda - percent of subject viewership multiplied by 20 gives marketshare
Conservative Agenda - percent of subject viewership divided by 20 gives marketshare
Then make certain that the test market measured is made up of Socialists, Maoists, Communist and other Libtards.
Actually Cable News ratings have long favored Fox and their upward ratings climb has been historic and something the old propagandists can’t ignore. All they can do is insult Fox (and the blogosphere, and Rush, et al) as they continuously lose their ever tinier share of media power.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/10/15/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-october-14-2010/68253
O’Donnell’s doing ok, actually.
Rove owes her and her campaign an apology, and a climb down.
She really should win.
Is he still a condescending elitist jerk?
Pray for America
I watched part of the debate the other evening.
O’Donnell knows she is losing the race and it shows on her face.
The latest question was from a student - asking about “carbon footprint” legislation. Brainwashed munchkin question, but there it was.
Coons rambled on aimlessly, and the question went to O’Donnell. She accused Coons of standing to benefit from cap and tax. Pointed out whoever wins the seat will be sworn in immediately and could vote on cap and trade in the lame duck session - and asked if he, if elected would recuse himself from that.
Coons at first pretended he didn’t understand. He looked to Wolf, who then challenged O’Donnell to elaborate.
SHE DID elaborate.
Coons was left blathering some lame excuse how the family business made too many products for him to know that.
LOL yes. Condescending elitist jerk. But sort of dumb, frankly.
Wolf is asking him right now about being Harry Reid’s “pet”!
This is funny.
So you’re pretty much of the same mind toward O’Donnell as you are regarding Palin.
But you’re for Mitt Romney. Hmm.
My thinking is - Romney’s people are deliberately trying to sabotage Tea Party people from gaining influence in the GOP.
Even if it means,... deliberately causing Democrats to win.
I wonder if she has put her knowledge of Supreme Court cases up on her website yet??
I’m speaking about one candidate and one race only.
Nothing more. Nothing less.
She may also want to post information about bond ratings on her site as well.
Uh huh.
Ok sure.
“O’Donnell knows she is losing the race and it shows on her face.”
So does that please you?
Romney and the old guard GOP are all collegial with the Democrats, having cut many a deal with them. Tea party types don't appear amenable to cutting deals. Simple self interest.
Romney also knows his weathervane political history is anathema to tea party types, so he reflexively opposes them, but under cover of proxies as always, it's his SOP. Deflects blowback, creates plausible deniability, keeps the ugly stuff at arms' length.
Funny where does it show on her face? Please explain since she closed half the gap after the debate.
I would say he came across as playing defense and thinking he had it won 3 weeks before the vote. Kinda like whats her name against Scott Brown.
Pray for America
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.