Skip to comments.
Mystery seafaring ancestor found in the Philippines
New Scientist ^
| 03 June 2010
| Jeff Hecht
Posted on 06/04/2010 12:36:29 PM PDT by Palter
The discovery of a single foot bone is forcing anthropologists to rethink how people first reached the islands off south-east Asia. It suggests that humans arrived on Luzon, the largest and northernmost major island in the Philippines, at least 67,000 years ago, tens of thousands of years earlier than had been thought.
The arrival of people in Australia 50,000 to 60,000 years ago is a good comparison," says expedition member Florent Detroit of the National Museum for Natural History in Paris, France. We have no idea how settlers got to Australia, he says, but we know from the archaeological evidence that they reached it settled it.
It seems coherent for us to think that in; south-east Asia and Australia, humans had sea-faring capabilities by 60,000 to 70,000 years ago."
Castaways
Getting to Luzon would have required crossing the open sea, long before any evidence that people had mastered boat-building or navigation. And the settlers of Luzon were not the only early humans who crossed the open ocean to live on the archipelago that sprawls between Asia and Australia. The oldest fossils of Homo floresiensis, the famed "hobbits" of Flores, date from 38,000 years ago, but stone tools found on that Indonesian island date back a million years.
Stone tools older than the Luzon foot bone have also been found recently on Sulawesi and Timor, says William Jungers, an anthropologist at Stony Brook University in New York who has worked in south-east Asia but was not involved in the latest discovery.
Even during the peak of the most recent ice age, when sea level was as much as 120 metres lower than it is today, all of those islands were isolated from the mainland.
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: dna; evolution; migration; philippines
1
posted on
06/04/2010 12:36:29 PM PDT
by
Palter
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
06/04/2010 12:36:45 PM PDT
by
Palter
(Kilroy was here.)
To: Palter
PLEASE don’t hyperlink articles that require a payment to read.
3
posted on
06/04/2010 12:43:07 PM PDT
by
pabianice
To: pabianice
Did you go to the article the OP posted? The article he posted is not a pay article. The hyperlinks are copied as page source information from the original article and not put there by the OP.
Cheer up, it’s Friday.
4
posted on
06/04/2010 12:48:47 PM PDT
by
Dexter Morgan
(Everyone hides who they are.)
To: Palter
Gilligan’s 1,349 x great uncle who disappeared on a 3 hour trip has finally been found.
5
posted on
06/04/2010 12:57:57 PM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: Palter


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
6
posted on
06/04/2010 1:27:50 PM PDT
by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: Palter
Water, water, everywhere,
And all the boards did shrink;
Water, water, everywhere,
Nor any drop to drink.
To: Palter
"The discovery of a single foot bone is forcing anthropologists to rethink how people first reached the islands off south-east Asia. It suggests that humans arrived on Luzon...at least 67,000 years ago, tens of thousands of years earlier than had been thought." Nope. It suggests a human foot bone arrived on Luzon at least 67,000 years ago...
8
posted on
06/04/2010 2:14:28 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Palter
I’ll go investigate. Their woman are SMOKING hot!!
9
posted on
06/04/2010 3:26:38 PM PDT
by
Moleman
To: Palter; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 240B; 24Karet; ...
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·
|
| |
Gods Graves Glyphs
|
Thanks Palter! The oldest fossils of Homo floresiensis, the famed "hobbits" of Flores, date from 38,000 years ago, but stone tools found on that Indonesian island date back a million years. Now I've gotta go look -- I thought the figure was more like 800,000 years. Funny thing, during all that span of time, Flores has always been isolated, always an island, including during glaciations when sealevel was lower.
And yet, there are still those who claim that Australia was isolated until 40,000 years ago -- and then isolated again for another 39,500 years.
BTW all -- I'm going to try to whip up the Digest tonight and post it before bed, because I've got a full plate tomorrow, and for the next couple of months thereafter. ;')
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
|
·Dogpile · Archaeologica · LiveScience · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·
|
10
posted on
06/04/2010 7:12:16 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: SunkenCiv
11
posted on
06/04/2010 7:26:26 PM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress!)
To: Moleman
Art Bell agrees with you.
12
posted on
06/04/2010 8:05:17 PM PDT
by
Sawdring
To: SunkenCiv
The ancient seafarers were an attractive bunch, at least the women were . . .
To: colorado tanker; BIGLOOK
14
posted on
06/07/2010 5:26:05 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: Palter
I thought that we all went back To Africa 50K years ago/
15
posted on
06/07/2010 5:32:25 PM PDT
by
Little Bill
(Harry Browne is a poofter)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson