Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret history of North America: Author to speak about Kensington Runestone, Vikings and Templars
Winona Daily News ^ | November 30, 2009 | DARRELL EHRLICK

Posted on 12/02/2009 10:49:42 AM PST by americanophile

Geologist Scott Wolter wants you to forget 1492.

While you're at it, forget the Nina, the Pinta and the Santa Maria.

Forget all of it.

Forget Christopher Columbus because he wasn't the first European to visit North America and Wolter is out to prove it in his new book, "The Hooked X: The Key to the Secret History of North America."

Minnesota and the Great Lakes states play a key part in that history, Wolter said, as Vikings and Cistercian monks traveled here leaving behind inscriptions and evidence that they were here long before Queen Isabella hocked her jewels to finance the Columbian journey to the New World.

Wolter, a trained geologist, first became interested in North America's discovery by accident.

His firm - American Petrographic Services - was hired to analyze the weathering on the Kensington Runestone, a stone found by a farmer in western Minnesota in 1898 that had runic inscription on it.

For years, historians and archaeologists have argued about its authenticity. Many outside the area have claimed it was a hoax.

Yet, when Wolter, who had never heard of the stone, analyzed it in 2000, he discovered the weathering on the stone's inscription was at least 200 years old, meaning it was carved before 1700.

"I had originally told the Kensington Museum that they needed to understand that I will give you news you may not like and you'll still pay me," Wolter said.

When the testing came back, Wolter presented his findings at conferences and was asked to present it to archaeologists and historians.

"It was like I was talking to a wall," Wolter said.

He presented his scientific findings which had been reviewed by a panel of eight other certified geologists. All concluded the stone's carvings were more than 200 years old.

(Excerpt) Read more at winonadailynews.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: americaunearthed; ancientnavigation; barryfell; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; history; kensington; kensingtonrunestone; minnesota; olofohman; scottwolter; thehookedx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2009 10:49:43 AM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping


2 posted on 12/02/2009 10:51:01 AM PST by americanophile ("For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Had me going to bad he had to muck it up with the Temlpars.

To me there can be no doubt that Vikings explored North America’s coastlines from Greenland or Iceland.


3 posted on 12/02/2009 10:55:49 AM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Wolter points out those groups were looking for minerals like copper, lead, nickel, zinc, gold and silver - all found abundantly in the Great Lakes region. "We've found hundreds of places where they were mined hundreds of years ago," Wolter said. "Who did it? The Native Americans didn't do it."

No? There are plenty of copper ornaments in pre-Columbian archaeological sites. The Indians mined it and cold-hammered it into shape....they just didn't smelt it. I dunno about the other metals, but it wouldn't surprise me either. The Hopewell people had a vast trade network and, apparently, the wealth to care about such things.

That said, I am open to new theories about who got here when.

4 posted on 12/02/2009 10:56:48 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Ya, the Templar thing is without evidence, but the Norse connection has been proven in places like L’Anse aux Meadows.


5 posted on 12/02/2009 10:59:11 AM PST by americanophile ("For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I’d think that any sizable number of strangers would be in Indian tales and totems.


6 posted on 12/02/2009 11:05:39 AM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Didn't the History Channel recently have a 2-hour long program about this hypothesis?
7 posted on 12/02/2009 11:06:38 AM PST by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35

Actually there may be some proof that Templars, or ex. Templars (after they were disbanded by Pope and fled to Scotland)made it to Massachusetts in the 1300s. The guys name was Sinclair. They did have a navy of some sort.


8 posted on 12/02/2009 11:09:14 AM PST by brooklyn dave (NIDAL HASAN = TERRORIST: MSM WHY DON'TCHA SAY SO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: padre35

probably came in thru Hudson Bay when the ice was light up north .. not sure I’ve ever seen any Templar connection in that area .. tho there are a few nice high spots with great views.. used to park at ‘em as teenagers. ;-)


9 posted on 12/02/2009 11:10:03 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. May yur bandwidth exceed your girth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Never did take him too seriously. My best guess was that he was messin' with the Queen and taking a cruise was a payoff.

Always thought he was probably the coolest guy in Town...The Queen wasn't about to pass him up but she also had to get him out of town and ordered him to discover someplace different.

And that's where the phrase....Land Ho!! came from!!

10 posted on 12/02/2009 11:24:24 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Everybody hates Chris!!!


11 posted on 12/02/2009 11:31:54 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Hmmm... I thought it was solidly accepted that the vikings where here before 1492?


12 posted on 12/02/2009 11:40:42 AM PST by IronKros (Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition. ~Adam Smith, The Wealth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks americanophile.

Templars no, Vikings yes. :')

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


13 posted on 12/02/2009 11:50:21 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I have seen the Nat Geo 2 hr show and this is the discussion of the same evidence. It is very compelling and makes a lot of sense. I think those of you who condemn or mock this should see it first. Lots of real evidence is presented by multiple sources.


14 posted on 12/02/2009 12:04:39 PM PST by tightwadbob (There is no right way to do the wrong thing. Hardcore Angry Conservative for Pres in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IronKros

I think the idea that Vikings got to North America (Canada) first has been accepted for a long time. At least as long as I’ve been around. (Disclaimer - all my grandparents were born in Norway!).

The idea that they made it all the way inland to Minnesota has been in question. Although I guess the idea that the farmer faked it seems to be ruled out now.


15 posted on 12/02/2009 12:13:37 PM PST by 21twelve (Drive Reality out with a pitchfork if you want , it always comes back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I think that in this, as in many other things, we have no knowlege. The more I read the more that I am aware of our ignorance.


16 posted on 12/02/2009 12:16:19 PM PST by Little Bill (Carol Che-Porter is a MOONBAT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

In fact, Virginia Dare was NOT the first European child born in America. There was one born sometime about the year 1000. Forget his name. Snorri ??


17 posted on 12/02/2009 12:20:12 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
We went to a Viking/Norseman exhibit at the Houston Museum of Natural Science. They had maps there showing just how far inland the Vikings make it. Minnesota was listed as settled.

Maybe they had a disclaimer I didn't see about how this wasn't the consensus.
18 posted on 12/02/2009 12:35:01 PM PST by IronKros (Science is the great antidote to the poison of enthusiasm and superstition. ~Adam Smith, The Wealth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I suspected Andrew Rune was at least 200 years myself but it was not due to weathering....bwahahahahaha...maybe the eyebrows are younger?/snicker.


19 posted on 12/02/2009 12:43:06 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Yes, L’Anse aux Meadows in northern Newfoundland is definitely European (about A.D. 1000). I remember reading that a Norwegian coin of later date was found by archaeologists in an Indian site in Maine, indicating continuing trips by Norsemen to the New World. They didn’t necessarily get as far as Maine—the coin could have been traded between one Indian tribe and another.


20 posted on 12/02/2009 12:49:11 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson