Posted on 10/02/2009 7:26:50 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
The day began with a shooting competition in Connecticut. By afternoon, the Boston police officers were drinking beer and margaritas in a nearby parking lot. By the end of the night, they had stopped at two bars, where they downed tequila shots and more beer. Soon afterward, the three officers, two men and a young woman only a couple of years out of the academy, went back to a hotel near Farmington, where they all agreed to share a room. As the woman collapsed into bed, she said she felt someone crawl in next to her. It was one of the two other officers. As she tried to resist, she said, he grabbed her by the neck, threatened to ruin her life, and told her to be quiet.
“He grabbed my throat and squeezed really hard,’’ she said. “I remember thinking I couldn’t breathe.’’
He raped her twice on that late August night, she said, while the other officer lay passed out on the hotel room floor.
Yesterday, the woman stood in a Dorchester District courtroom, just 10 feet away from the man she has accused of raping her, leaving her pregnant, and threatening her husband’s life. She was there to urge Judge David Weingarten to extend a restraining order issued against the officer Monday. The Globe is withholding her name because the newspaper does not identify people who allegedly were sexually assaulted. The accused officer is not being identified because he has not been charged with a crime.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Boston’s finest!!
They left the part out of the story where the alleged victims service relover accidently went off at her house. This story doesn’t add up at all and is very strange.
If I were her husband, the “restraining order” against this animal would have long since been permanent.
I’m not blaming the victim here - honestly I’m not - but why would a married woman share a hotel room with two drunken men?
I smell serious BS. She went out to a bar and shared a hotel room with them?? Then had sex with the guy 3 more times? She’s either lying or the dumbest broad ever.
If I were here husband, I’d no longer be her husband.
Something doesn’t add up.
Read the story, the “victim” had sex with the other officer 4 more times and at first told her husband that it was consenual and then changed her story to rape. She is pregnant as well.
So, to recap:
No one's been charged with a crime, we don't really know what happened and we don't really know who the accuser is, nor the accused.
But film at 11:00 ... of course.
” The accused officer is not being identified because he has not been charged with a crime.”
Why not?
So....she was out getting hammered drunk with two men in the wee hours of the morning while her husband was....?
And she had sex with her alleged attacker AFTER the “rape.”
She may well have been raped, but at best right now it’s a “her word vs his right now.”
Why would a married woman go barhopping and get drunk with two men? The facts may be as she stated - but she was reckless and foolish.
Because the accuser doesn’t seem credible. Read the story.
/ S
She then met the accused four more times after that night and had sex or she was raped. She first told her husband that she was pregnant and that the sex was consenual. Then she changed the story to rape. The other twist is that when the police went to her house to confiscate her service relover it “accidently went off”.
Actually this story was started when the “victim” was having her service relover confiscated at her house by members of police department and it “accidently” went off. Other wise this story probably would never have been told.
We shall see. My guess is that there is going to be a trial over this at some point.
The left gave us a post-moral culture, they called it “liberating”.
What did we expect?
Seems to me that the accuser is too damned delicate and malleable for police work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.