[outpostinmass2]

During the hearing, the woman’s husband and several uniformed Boston police officers looked on as she gave horrific details about the alleged attacks. After raping her on Aug. 25, she said, the officer demanded sex from her again the next day. Intimidated, she said, she agreed to have sex with him three more times in the next month.

[ConservativeMind]

Boston’s finest!!

[Jeff Head]

If I were her husband, the “restraining order” against this animal would have long since been permanent.

[vladimir998]

I’m not blaming the victim here - honestly I’m not - but why would a married woman share a hotel room with two drunken men?

[jessduntno]

[Huck]

I smell serious BS. She went out to a bar and shared a hotel room with them?? Then had sex with the guy 3 more times? She’s either lying or the dumbest broad ever.

[ClearCase_guy]

The Globe is withholding her name because the newspaper does not identify people who allegedly were sexually assaulted. The accused officer is not being identified because he has not been charged with a crime.

So, to recap:

No one's been charged with a crime, we don't really know what happened and we don't really know who the accuser is, nor the accused.

But film at 11:00 ... of course.

[ColdWater]

” The accused officer is not being identified because he has not been charged with a crime.”

Why not?

[Grunthor]

So....she was out getting hammered drunk with two men in the wee hours of the morning while her husband was....?

And she had sex with her alleged attacker AFTER the “rape.”

She may well have been raped, but at best right now it’s a “her word vs his right now.”

[GeronL]

The left gave us a post-moral culture, they called it “liberating”.

What did we expect?

[VeniVidiVici]

Intimidated, she said, she agreed to have sex with him three more times in the next month.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

[10Ring]

Later that day, police collected her department-issued gun and personal firearms. One of those personal weapons accidentally went off as she handed it to police, but no one was injured, according to two law enforcement officials with knowledge of the event.

I'll have to blame the "journalist" as this does not make any sense and there is no elaboration. If the above is true, and she is a member of SWAT, then she does not belong anywhere near a firearm. Truly a WTF story all around.