Posted on 08/09/2009 4:45:11 PM PDT by Polarik
Basically, it comes down to this. I made a promise to my family get off of here, but continued to break that promise. There is sufficient momentum for the birth certificate issue to where any further research is unnecessary.
The fact that Hawaii refuses to authenticate or acknowledge producing the COLB that the libs insist that is real, along with the statements made to me by Dr. Alvin Onaka in late October, pretty much nixes any hope by the opposition that a real Obama 2007 COLB exists.
The libs can refute my research all they want, but it's not going change the reality that they are arguing about a nonexistent document.
It is they who are on the wrong side of reality, not me.
My last post says it all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2311347/posts
If anyone believes that the one and only scan image was produced by what appears in the Factcheck photos, then there is seriously something wrong with their eyesight.
There is nothing wrong with the eyesight of scores of FReepers who saw shadows under the letters on the Factcheck photograph of a "real COLB."
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/two-certfs.jpg
The image above is the photo I took of a real COLB using the same make and model of camera as Factcheck, except that I had a real COLB. The one on the bottom is the image with the shadows. Those pink arrows are pointing to them.
I would sincerely love to hear how the opposition explains those, but I gotta go.
I also leave with the challenge I made but never taken:
Make a real scan, naturally and honestly, that looks like the alleged "scan image."
No one can. It's impossible for several reasons. The colors of this image are so far off from the actual colors contained in a real COLB scan, that you cannot get there without extensive manipulation of the color curves.
Secondly, the background image and the text were deliberately subjected to heavy sharpening using an Unsharp Mask - but they were not done at the same time.
Lastly, that "funky" border, as one of my favorite critics described it, will not be exactly reproducible from any scanned COLB border in existence.
"Close" only counts in horseshoes.
No way. No how.
Oh, you may get close after playing around with all of the controls in Photoshop, but you will not get the border pattern right.
I know because I reproduced it (middle image), and I know how it was done - it was made separately and added to the image.
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/FactCheck%20Originals/BORDER-COMPARISON.jpg
But, if you think you can do it, more power to you.
Rather than ragging on my research, which is what I do better than anyone, go ahead and do your own.
It's easy.
Oh, I forgot. You have to get a real COLB to do it.
Isn't it funny that none, nada, zip, zero of my critics has ever made a real COLB scan from a real COLB in over a year since I began my research, and actualy replicated what I did.
They'll make up some excuse for not reading all of my research report, like it was "too painful to read," and so forth. Then, they will do their own thing which is not remotely close to my thing.
Well, don't be discouraged: Factcheck never had a real COLB, either.
I would like to thank everyone who supported me and those who know me will be passing along the latest news on FR to me.
BUT, I am never logging back on FR as Polarik again.
That's a promise I will keep.
Bo. I said it was ordered in 2000. Which is exactly what I remembered.
It is not a fake, and never was. I was erroneous in my recollections. When I found that out, I owned up to it.
Polarik was nothing short of viscous in his post. He NOT ONCE reminded me to send more scans, which was a simple over-site on my part and was immediately corrected. He never apologized for calling me a fraud. I think that’s out of line.
My COLB is in no way a fake Null. and repeating that BS again only makes you look like a... well a jerk.
I owned up to an honest mistake and provided proof of my mistake. Thats called being and acting like an adult. How about you and Polarik (well after his Opus never mind) try doing just a wee bit of that yourselves?
BS. As soon as I saw that post of his, I DID send him what he asked for. Not once did he reply to one of the several messages and photos and scans I sent him. I dealt with him above board until HE started it all with his accusations and his lack of response.
For the record I am not trashing him. I am stating what happened. If you take that as trashing, then take it up with yourself because that is where the problem lay.
Thank you for the work you did and for bringing attention to what most of us know............ and that is that the crap he posted on the internet is irelevant and probably fake. One day he is going to have to admit that when he can’t show the long form.
Enjoy time with your family, get a new name and come back to FR please. You will be missed! God bless.
JEFF HEAD PISSANT HOOSIERMAMA
We also have their private addresses after a lot of research.
I'm raising the BS flag on this last claim. Nothing but internet tough guy talk.
PING
You forgot to ping them.
Bon voyage, Polarik!
Fair winds and following seas......
Not only did I post the receipt that proved I was mistaken, I owned up to it and apologized!
***Okay, that’s fine, just point out When and where? Not by the time post 604 was posted...
Good luck to you and thank you for all of your hard work.
Hoping you will be back to FR, with just a new Freeper name! I value your expertise and input as I know many others do!
See you later.... :)
Good luck on your new endeavor.
The ‘problem’ lay with your vehement insistence that the image you posted of a portion of a Colb that showed a date stamp in 2007 on a document received by you several years prior, was in fact genuine; that the ‘mistake’ was made in Hawaii, which proved that the date stamp on the obama CoLB was in itself a genuine item - THAT was the problem.
I read the thread, I hesitated to respond and point out to you why this was impossible, I hoped you would find your mistake...but you continued to insist. Right through, we got the stories about you moving, about your operation, you used every item (except the kitchen sink!) in an attempt to validate the date on the factcheck document, that anyone with half a brain, would have assumed your mission was to act as a factcheck agent.
I said nothing, though I certainly wanted to. I watched as you continued to insist.
And finally, Polarik gave his opinion. OPINION! He wrote exactly what I was thinking. Polarik did not say he had done an analysis, he reacted. While I sat and watched as you attempted to make it appear that Hawaii stamps documents at random...and discussed even the placement of the stamping machines, and told us details of telephone conversations with Hawaii...
Do you realize what a hullabaloo you created? Tell me, is your attention seeking satisfied yet?
I wrote to you on the thread finally. Kindly. I suggested that under these trying times, emotions and tempers are frayed. I suggested you let it go.
From my point of view, you came close to presenting a forgery in my mind. You are fortunate you still have supporters on FR. The work Polarik did over time, how much of himself he gave, for a thankless task, may never be duplicated.
Your behaviour and unforgiving attitude under the circumstances, when you, yourself must admit you insisted on trying to validate a document that could NOT be validated as you presented it, just might be one of the many good reasons Polarik is taking a sabatical.
Thanks for nothing.
bump! :)
Sounds good to me.
All we gotta do is get Helen to sign up as the gatekeeper. Or someone else with a 1997 signon date. There’s probably no more than a dozen left.
“The image above is the photo I took of a real COLB using the same make and model of camera as Factcheck...”
___________
You could find out the “make and model” of the camera used by Factcheck!!!!!! Wow that is UNBELIEVABLE research. Really, not to be believed.
My uncle lives in Tyler.
His brother (my Dad) lives in Quitman, TX (Sissy Spacek’s
hometown).
:)
Hey Fred, at least I had the balls to apologize!
Congrats! You just proved you never read any of the research, but don’t let that stop you.
For the record, did you have anything to do with publicly posting Polarik’s personal information on the web? Directly or indirectly?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.