Skip to comments.
The Illustrious Dead: The Terrifying Story of How Typhus Killed Napoleon's Greatest Army
Amazon.com ^
| Unknown
| Unknown
Posted on 05/31/2009 1:03:31 PM PDT by decimon
>
Even as the Russians retreated before him in disarray, Napoleon found his army disappearing, his frantic doctors powerless to explain what had struck down a hundred thousand soldiers. The emperors vaunted military brilliance suddenly seemed useless, and when the Russians put their own occupied capital to the torch, the campaign became a desperate race through the frozen landscape as troops continued to die by the thousands. Through it all, with tragic heroism, Napoleons disease-ravaged, freezing, starving men somehow rallied, again and again, to cries of Vive lEmpereur!
>
(Excerpt) Read more at amazon.com ...
TOPICS: Books/Literature; Health/Medicine; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: bonaparte; france; godsgravesglyphs; napoleon; napoleonbonaparte; typhus; worldhistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: hellbender
An obvious (and maybe dumb) question is this: Why was typhus a worse problem for Napoleons army than for the Russians? I would guess the answer is that the French forces were more concentrated, allowing the disease to spread more easily.Shorter lines of supply and friendlier local population, too. The Russians would have had better access to food, clothing, and shelter than the French, who would have had to bring everything with them or steal it from the natives.
21
posted on
05/31/2009 1:38:07 PM PDT
by
x
To: hellbender
An obvious (and maybe dumb) question is this: Why was typhus a worse problem for Napoleons army than for the Russians? I would guess the answer is that the French forces were more concentrated, allowing the disease to spread more easily.The Wikipedia entry for typhus shows three types. "Epidemic typhus" comes from lice. Maybe the Russians didn't get the lice.
22
posted on
05/31/2009 1:39:22 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
Thick tan line: Napoleon's vast army heading for Moscow.
Thinning black line: Napoleon and a couple friends coming home.
23
posted on
05/31/2009 1:43:33 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(We are a ruled people, serfs to the Federal Oligarchy -- and the Tree of Liberty thirsts)
To: hellbender
Isn’t typhus spread through contaminated water? Having thousands of men encamped around streams and lakes, living in close proximity to latrines, etc.
To: Madam Theophilus
Isnt typhus spread through contaminated water?Typhoid fever. Whole other disease.
25
posted on
05/31/2009 1:49:48 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
I checked Wikipedia, and it says millions died of typhus in Russia during WW I and the subsequent Russian civil war. Russians are certainly not immune.
To: ClearCase_guy
Attrition. Definitely attrition. ;-)
27
posted on
05/31/2009 1:51:37 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: Madam Theophilus
You are thinking of typhoid fever, which is a completely different disease, spread by the oral-fecal route. Typhus is spread by blood-sucking insects or other arthropods.
To: hellbender
I checked Wikipedia, and it says millions died of typhus in Russia during WW I and the subsequent Russian civil war. Russians are certainly not immune.If they're human then they are not immune. But in this campaign they were possibly not louse infected as were the French.
29
posted on
05/31/2009 1:54:15 PM PDT
by
decimon
To: decimon
I'm having trouble researching the issue with an internet connection slower than those found on the Russian steppes, but I think surviving typhus confers lifetime immunity. More of the Russians may have had the disease already before the war. Also, as has been said, the French forces were larger and more concentrated.
I also wondered why the French were affected more by yellow fever than the Haitian blacks. This is probably the answer:
" Disease outbreaks in towns and non-native people may be more serious because of higher densities of mosquito vectors and higher population densities.[15]"
Although the pathogens are very different, typhus is also an insect-borne infection, so the same factors might apply as with yellow fever.
To: Cheburashka
Yep. One can only speculate on what might have happened though, if instead of getting (literally) bogged down in Haiti, Napoleon had sent those troops directly to New Orleans and fortified the Mississippi as he planned to do.
31
posted on
05/31/2009 2:32:46 PM PDT
by
Hugin
(GSA! (Goodbye sweet America))
To: Krankor
General Mud and Marshal Snow. The same two defeated Hitler as well.
32
posted on
05/31/2009 2:42:25 PM PDT
by
Argus
(We've gone downtown to Clown Town, and that's where we'll be living from now on..)
33
posted on
05/31/2009 4:12:13 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: decimon
That bug and the little ice age that is the same as we are heading.
34
posted on
05/31/2009 4:13:56 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Hey GOP follow Dick Cheney's lead)
To: decimon; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·
|
|
Gods Graves Glyphs
|
Thanks decimon.
Something that's bugged me over the years -- Napoleon must have been aware of Herodotus' "Historia", and the account of the Persians trying to chase down the Scythians up in what is I guess the Ukraine, anyway, the plains north of the Black Sea. They never could catch up to them (the Scythians would see them marching up, pack up everything, and ride off for some hours, leaving the Persians a few days march behind), and finally had to amscray because of the change of the season. And even if Nappy overlooked that, one would think that the Kaiser would have remembered Napoleon. And for that matter, that *Hitler* would have remembered both of them... Or all three...
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
|
·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society · · Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·
|
35
posted on
05/31/2009 4:16:05 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
I saw a segment about that. How Nappy coulda been a contendah, if: The weather hadn’t turned bad, typhus hadn’t been such a killer, and Russia hadn’t been so stubborn.
Actually, by the amount of dead, I would say that the graves of Nappy’s army show more evidence of typhus than war injuries. Mass graves have been found where the interred had no injuries. On doing further research, it was found that typhus was the culprit. Works fer me!!
36
posted on
05/31/2009 4:25:58 PM PDT
by
Monkey Face
(Is a vegetatian permitted to eat animal crackers?)
To: JoeProBono
Thanks, Berosus.
37
posted on
05/31/2009 4:28:33 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Monkey Face
Even
the cold wouldn't account for it, although that certainly would have taken some toll on a bunch of dehydrating untreated sickos. I wonder if it was just the flu, given the time of year for the retreat? But of course, the campaign was six months long, plenty of time for typhus to hit them in the summer month, er, months. ;') Always pays to get your innoculations up to date before you travel in Asia.
38
posted on
05/31/2009 4:36:24 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
According to the segment I saw, typhus was the culprit, based on the DNA samples of the unmarred bones. And there were several mass graves between Russia and Europe that gave evidence of the disease.
We can survive cold, given the proper tools, but I suspect this was beyond what the retreating soldiers could handle.
39
posted on
05/31/2009 4:40:50 PM PDT
by
Monkey Face
(Is a vegetatian permitted to eat animal crackers?)
To: Madam Theophilus; decimon; hellbender
Typhus was a common risk in the Nazi death camps and concentration camps.
Typhus is caused by one of two types of bacteria: Rickettsia typhi or Rickettsia prowazekii. The form of typus depends on which type of bacteria causes the infection. Rickettsia typhi causes murine or endemic typhus. Endemic typhus is uncommon in the United States. It is usually seen in areas where hygiene is poor and the temperature is cold. Endemic typhus is sometimes called "jail fever." Lice and fleas of flying squirrels spread the bacteria. Murine typhus occurs in the southeastern and southern United States, often during the summer and fall. It is rarely deadly... Rickettsia prowazekii causes epidemic typhus and Brill-Zinsser disease. Brill-Zinsser disease is a mild form of epidemic typhus. It occurs when the disease re-activates in a person who was previously infected. It is more common in the elderly. -- *
40
posted on
05/31/2009 4:42:34 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson