"Links! LIIIINKSSS!"
Posted on 02/26/2009 1:15:06 PM PST by jackofhearts
I have it on impeccable authority but cannot disclose my source within the Fox Network. Rest assured that Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdock are sitting on the Obama eligibility/birth certficate story. Everyone else wants to jump all over it, including Sean Hannity.
I say storm the Ailes/Murdock fax machine/email servers--let them know (politely) we need this issue thoroughly.
Maybe someone has the email/fax numbers?
I don’t think so. If SCOTUS rules that Obama is ineligible, then it goes to Biden. I don’t think Congress gets any say in it.
As usual, the Obama Derangement crowd doesn’t like conservative opinions other than their own..., and *especially* those who don’t “buy into” the conspiracy theories and derangement...
(BONK) upside the head. Go talk to a Constitutional expert, they will tell you the same thing.
And Yes, post #52 gives a plausible answer.
You said — “The game is not providing evidence, the game is providing innuendo. Put Obama on the defensive. We don’t have to prove anything to do that, we just have to put the question out there.”
THERE YOU GO..., that pretty much explains what the “Obama Derangement Syndrom” people (here on Free Republic) are doing. You said it — “providing innuendo” — and that’s all.
It’s no wonder they can’t get a court in the land to “do anything” — and, of course, this “proves” that the court system is corrupt, too... LOL...
Whether or not the story "has legs", the fact that numerous lawsuits have been filed and dozens of people have raised the issue constitutes a news story. How many times have the MSM reported, with front page headlines and 24/7 coverage, some non-starter story based solely on allegations and hearsay? They cover their @$$es by claiming that they are merely reporting the fact that the allegations were made. In this case, there are legitimate questions about an issue that is absolutely crucial to our nation's survival. Bring it on, Fox News.
Heheeheh, I see you've had experience with S.T.
Ooooops, almost forgot the lol ;^)
.... along with the “court order” and the US Marshal escorting Obama off the premises of the White House, too? LOL...
Or, are you including the U.S. Military in there, too — along with the tanks surrounding the White House?
"Links! LIIIINKSSS!"
You said — “(BONK) upside the head. Go talk to a Constitutional expert, they will tell you the same thing.”
I predicted (to that other poster) that there would be posters, coming soon, that would be saying this... and I was right... LOL...
Usurpers are not presidents. They are criminals.
Only a real president can be impeached.
This story has been around for at least nine months. So far the only defensive Obama has been put on is having his lawyers submit briefs that have gotten every case that's gotten to a judge dismissed. Meanwhile, the birthers are busy attacking each other.
I just heard Joe Scarborough advise conservatives in his address CPAC to refrain from calling Obama a " communist" because it was counterproductive. I must say that we have come to a point, or at least we are very nearly at the point, where such admonitions to observe punctiliousness in the face of a hurricane is becoming fatuous. If we lose talk radio and perhaps also Fox, there is literally no institution left in America which might save us from a Manchurian Marxist. It is literally possible that the damage which has been done by these spending laws to the Republic, our democracy, our capitalism are irretrievably lost and can not be rescued even with a free press which truly is fair and balanced. The damage might be done even if Obama is not a Manchurian Marxist because we simply cannot control the forces we have unleashed with these mindless spending bills. Has Barak Obama has put in motion forces which neither he nor we can control?
Without a reliable free press how can we tell where we are and where we must go? Without the basic institutions envisioned by the founding fathers, how do we overcome the curse of the Democrats?
Here is mine.
Obama, for all of his shortcomings, is a brilliant politician. It is my opinion, based on nothing more than the circumstances, that he has documentation of his American birth. I believe he has yet to produce the document because his actual name is Barack Hussein Mohammed Obama.
This being the case, he does not want to produce the document. It must be his judgment that the minor irritation of those questioning his place of birth is worth avoiding this revelation. However, somewhere along the way, he determined that he would use this episode as a trap to, once and for all, discredit right-wing media.
If Rush, FOX News, or the NY Post comes forward with a story which alleges he is not a natural-born citizen, he will produce the document and take the hit for his full name, but also completely discredit his critic(s).
Just my humble opinion.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Bwahahahaha.
Okay, so, you have a source for a huge story like this but you don’t have a phone/fax number?
Bwahahahahaha.
My thoughts exactly. I am befuddled by the lack of media coverage.
You shouldn’t let your dislike and/or hatred of Obama get in the way of critical thinking...
I didn’t vote for him and campaigned against him during the campaign (see my post from before the election...). But that doesn’t stand in the way of critical thinking and cause me to jump onto conspiracy theories and buy into the Obama Derangement Syndrome (something that it is called by other conservatives, by the way...).
Revolution
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.