Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Anti Mullah Blog ^ | 1/11/09 | Tom Waite

Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN

I’m smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar theme—show proof you were born in the United States.

But now because just one of these ‘nuisance’ cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.

First, they’ve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral College’s votes) to discuss Berg’s writ of certiorari; the case can’t be dismissed—Berg will have legal standing!

And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes!

There’s no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially it’s a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesn’t comply by January 16th, the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; eligibility; obamaillegal; obamanoncitizenissue; scotus; tinfoilalert; tinfoilhat; trolldeniers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last
BO fought the Law & the Law won.
1 posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

I believe it when I see it. But I pray that you are right.


2 posted on 01/11/2009 9:22:34 AM PST by SolidWood (Sarah Palin - America the Beautiful)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN
LARGE PRINT GIVETH
Small print taketh away!

Works everytime.......

3 posted on 01/11/2009 9:23:47 AM PST by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

This sounds like another API fantasy. Scotus is never gonna do anything.


4 posted on 01/11/2009 9:24:19 AM PST by screaminsunshine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

What you say may be true, and I may live to see the day when your viewpoint is vindicated (for the record, I hope you are right).

But something tells me that Obama is going to be sworn on January 20 and he will be your President for the next four years: Constitution, facts, logic and the Law notwithstanding.


5 posted on 01/11/2009 9:25:25 AM PST by DieHard the Hunter (Is mise an ceann-cinnidh. Cha ghéill mi do dhuine. Fàg am bealach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN
He paid lawyers a lot of money to fight this. They are a talented team and they may still have a few tricks up their sleeves. And the tricks may be shady or criminal in nature. Just because they are lawyers does not mean they obey the law. Winning is the only thing.

Note that if just one SC justice is in fear of his life, he may set aside his scruples and shut down the case. We'll see....

6 posted on 01/11/2009 9:26:35 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN
Today is the 11th....so what happened at the conference on the 9th....?

Anything Anyone....?

7 posted on 01/11/2009 9:27:02 AM PST by spokeshave (For every sunspot found, a Global Warming angel gets their wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

Has anyone seen or posted any documents, brief, or response filed in any court by Obama’s attorneys?


8 posted on 01/11/2009 9:27:08 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

The fact that it’s gone as far as it has is noteworthy.


9 posted on 01/11/2009 9:28:27 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

Is that you, Pollyanna?


10 posted on 01/11/2009 9:29:15 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

It would be sweet and it would be wonderful to see the Constitution upheld. But I think you’re dreaming. This whole thing is going to quietly pass right on by without even a whimper.


11 posted on 01/11/2009 9:29:45 AM PST by Taichi (Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

On Friday the SCOTUS did not engage in a move of check. Rather, they moved an out of the way pawn and yielded control of the center of the board. This is poor chess and poor political maneuvering.


12 posted on 01/11/2009 9:32:12 AM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

He hasn’t had to because none of the cases have been able to establish standing. Without standing there is no case. Until standing can be shown they are frivilous cases.


13 posted on 01/11/2009 9:32:20 AM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN
And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes!

And in the real world, John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court will administer the Oath of Office to Barack Hussein Obama on January 20th, 2009.

It'll be on TV if you want to watch it live.

14 posted on 01/11/2009 9:32:52 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

My guess as a non-lawyer is that as long as the SCOTUS members do not issue a ruling, no precedent is set that could affect future court cases of this type. Because of the sensitivity of this particular election, and the ramifications of ruling that Obama would not be eligible to be president, the SCOTUS members may not want to rock the boat at this time, but want to leave the door open for future challenges of future presidents to be.

This is just my uneducated opinion.


15 posted on 01/11/2009 9:33:01 AM PST by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I’m not terribly interested in this issue because it will not be allowed to unseat the Messiah.

Still, he could end all this by simply providing it. He won’t, and that puzzles me.

Doing so would make the right wing look foolish.

Not doing so makes him seem foolish.


16 posted on 01/11/2009 9:34:51 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DE88

I wonder how much money Berg has been able to generate with this charade? I’d wager a guess that at least 1000 people have sent in the $50 he is requesting. Nice little moonlighting gig.


17 posted on 01/11/2009 9:35:07 AM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeManN

"The justices are considering your petition."

18 posted on 01/11/2009 9:37:09 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I wouldn't call a handful of conspiracy theorists the right wing.
19 posted on 01/11/2009 9:39:22 AM PST by DE88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DE88

They why does every thread say that OB has spent hundreds of thousands in attorney fees fighting the cases?


20 posted on 01/11/2009 9:44:06 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson