Skip to comments.
Origin Of Life On Earth: Simple Fusion To Jump-start Evolution
Science Daily ^
| Dec. 23, 2008
Posted on 12/23/2008 4:30:54 PM PST by Soliton
With the aid of a straightforward experiment, researchers have provided some clues to one of biology's most complex questions: how ancient organic molecules came together to form the basis of life.
RNA, the single-stranded precursor to DNA, normally expands one nucleic base at a time, growing sequentially like a linked chain. The problem is that in the primordial world RNA molecules didn't have enzymes to catalyze this reaction, and while RNA growth can proceed naturally, the rate would be so slow the RNA could never get more than a few pieces long (for as nucleic bases attach to one end, they can
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: antichrist; christianscience; evolution; genetics; god; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-196 next last
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
“funny though, how they dont reject when evil science keeps them alive, or helps them in other ways.”
I love hard science but have a general contempt for the many of the soft sciences. Evolutionary conjecture is definitely soft.
To: Soliton
They found that under favorable conditions (acidic environment and temperature lower than 70 degrees Celsius), pieces ranging from 10-24 in length could naturally fuse into larger fragments, generally within 14 hours.
Such a ridiculous over-simplification. I'm amazed Science Digest spent 7 paragraphs on it ... I'll wait patiently for future findings, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
22
posted on
12/23/2008 4:42:33 PM PST
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Soliton
Baiting the non-atheists, I see: “No religion allowed.”
23
posted on
12/23/2008 4:43:11 PM PST
by
Theo
(Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
To: Frank Sheed
I doubt it.
were you a janiter in a science lab?
BTW, guess you won’t be needing any of the scientific advances if you get sick. HA.
24
posted on
12/23/2008 4:43:12 PM PST
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(FREE BLAGO !!! LET HIM SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER !!!)
To: ScreamingFist
I'm not a bible thumper nor a scientist.....but I have yet to see science create life. I know, "just give us more public finds".I am unaware of any drive for public funding for proving evidence of chemical origins of life. Can you cite anY
25
posted on
12/23/2008 4:43:17 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: UnChained
Uh, huh..the pick and chose science.
Next time you need the “hard” medical science to help you when you get sick, be sure to tell them you don’t want any help if it invovled any of that ‘soft” gene therapy science.
26
posted on
12/23/2008 4:45:09 PM PST
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(FREE BLAGO !!! LET HIM SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER !!!)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
were you a janiter in a science lab?No, I was a scientist and I could spell janitor too. It made grants easier to read when the big words were spelled correctly.
27
posted on
12/23/2008 4:45:53 PM PST
by
Frank Sheed
(Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
To: wendy1946
YOU're the one trying to peddle evoloserism on a conservative forum.... Please do not resort to personal attacks. It is forbidden under the rules of Free Republic.
28
posted on
12/23/2008 4:46:03 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: TheNewPundit
If you dont believe that evolution is fact, then you are an idiot for not believing what science has proven to be true. Please disregard the fact that this article does point out that science has NOT proven evolution to be fact. You must believe in evolution and in man made global warming despite the fact that neither can be proven.I am sure you made your point. I am sorry that I don't get it. :0)
29
posted on
12/23/2008 4:48:03 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: Soliton
I am unaware of any drive for public funding for proving evidence of chemical origins of lifeI have apparently wandered on to the wrong thread. I will say I don't know many RNA researchers that pay for their own labs.....
30
posted on
12/23/2008 4:48:24 PM PST
by
ScreamingFist
(Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
“funny though, how they dont reject when evil science keeps them alive, or helps them in other ways.”
Funny how religious you science types get when things get tough.
31
posted on
12/23/2008 4:48:58 PM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: laweeks
32
posted on
12/23/2008 4:49:13 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: Soliton
33
posted on
12/23/2008 4:50:14 PM PST
by
mnehring
(Happy Holy-Days!)
To: Soliton
Yeah, my sarcasm can be slightly confusing.
To: Theo
Baiting the non-atheists, I see: No religion allowed.I am sorry, but I have been forbidden to speak of religion. Please go to the Religion Forum to discuss your faith :0)
35
posted on
12/23/2008 4:50:47 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: Kirkwood
“funny though, how they dont reject when evil science keeps them alive, or helps them in other ways.”
And all those elements with atomic numbers higher than Fe were formed by spontaneous RNA linkages.
To: driftdiver
“YOU science types” ...you are not even logical ...I am both religious and believe in evolution.
Guess I am not the RIGHT Christian brand according to you, cause you can’t believe religion and science can co-exist...except when you want help!
Pick and chose which science they want...Cafeteria christians.
37
posted on
12/23/2008 4:51:55 PM PST
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(FREE BLAGO !!! LET HIM SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER !!!)
To: Soliton
sorry I got hooked into the stupid posts that just can not argue or even discuss science without bringing their own, very limited and personal religion into a science discussion.
38
posted on
12/23/2008 4:53:13 PM PST
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(FREE BLAGO !!! LET HIM SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER !!!)
To: driftdiver
Funny how religious you science types get when things get tough.I would love to debate you but I have been forbidden to speak of religion. Please start your own thread.
39
posted on
12/23/2008 4:53:23 PM PST
by
Soliton
(This 2 shall pass)
To: Soliton
Please, this is a science caucus. No religion allowed. Oh please. Evolution and their believers have continously attacked Christianity. No one and certainly not you can keep people from expressing their points of view and defending their beliefs. Evolution is religion not science so what you have started here is a religious thread. Thanks!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-196 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson