Posted on 10/20/2008 6:42:48 PM PDT by Prole
Anyone who is watching "Hannity and Colmes" this evening should find it strange that Scott Rasmussen is explaining and even openly defending the tax policies of Barack Hussein Obama.
In particular, I noticed that Sean was telling Rasmussen that "businesses don't pay increased taxes, they pass that onto the consumer with increased prices."
What the heck was Scott Rasmussen doing by explaining and even DEFENDING the tax proposals of Barack Obama?
Isn't Rasmussen supposed to be an objective pollster?
Sorry, but that was your first mistake...... :^)
must be trying to beat “Hannity’s favorite pollster “ rap.
Harasspukkin on many topics. Personally, I think scott is a fraud.
If you tax the top 1% higher to fund a middle class tax cut, you will be taxing the very people who employ the folks who they want to give a tax cut to! For the want of a tax cut the middle class was lost..
There just isn't any doubt anymore.
How can Rasmussen expect me to buy into his analysis when he is explaining Obama's tax procedures.
A person who conducts objective analysis of the polls should have no affiliation for a candidate.
I really found that strange coming from Scott Rasmussen.
Wonder how much walking around money Ras is getting from Oboredom??
Pray for W, McCuda and Our Troops
An objective pollster?! Now that's a whopper!
If they're any objective pollsters out there in Media Land, I'm sure many of us on this forum would love to hear from them.
Another pollster who has been duped into showing his true colors.
What was his explanation?
Touche! This election is flushing all the ghosts into the sunshine.
Again, I just cannot believe that these pollsters expect me to believe their data when they are openly representing Barack Obama.
I am going to stay up for the re-broadcast of tonight's show, and do my best to re-cap in quotes for you.
I feel like I am living in the Twilight Zone more and more each day.
Pollsters should be as objective as a set of scales, not cheerleaders for Barack Obama.
Maybe not duped, but perhaps he’s been bought. Obama has a lot of money now - don’t think for a minute paying off pollsters (IE: setting them for life) isn’t out of the realm of possibility.
PKM, here is another short memory FReeper for ya’ thinking that RASS is showing that he deserves to have the “R” removed from his name again.
I thought he was trying to explain how the people viewed Obama’s plan. Reality doesn’t matter. Perception is what matters,and the GOP has done a piss poor job of explaining Obama’s plans. It isn’t his fault that people believe Obama.
I have lost all respect for Scott Rasmussen. He should only give us his numbers and why they are valid, not his bloviating crap on this or that. It’s obvious that his opinions affect his polling methods and their supposed outcomes. It absolutely makes no sense that he polls more democrats than republicans in VA and NC, that even after taking into consideration all the new acorn voter registrations there are still more republicans than democrats in those states. I don’t care what his Ohio and Florida polls say. I don’t think any of them are right.
RINO pollster?
Proof his numbers are fraudulent. Good news for us!
Who am I to argue? It certainly would not surprise me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.