Posted on 02/04/2008 10:38:28 AM PST by Mac1
My father had a .600 Nitro Express double rifle when I was growing up. No recoil pad, talk about HURT. I could never bring myself to touch off that other barrel.
We have those.....that thing blew up on the 30th shot !....:o)
That’s just the ammo bill after first weekend shoot in Texas ........add Beer, BBQ , Babes, Brasso (for the stripper poles)......add’s up quick.
Oh yes, it's "enough gun".
“Mac1 ~ it’s hard to believe that the U.K. has passed laws that prohibit or strictly control all private ownership of firearms.
I purchased one of these a couple of months ago, I guess that you wouldn’t be able to own one of these in the U.K.?”
Believe it. You are right regarding the M4 unless it was in 22lr/wmr - the Ruger 10/22 is legal, but any semi-auto rifle apart from calibre 22lr/wmr is illegal(banned since 1988). Alternatively they are legal as a straight pull bolt action and thus so configured are used in practical rifle shooting (like IPSC but with rifles). Still, there are bright points and this is one of them:
http://www.fcsa.co.uk/index.htm
“For sale, $125,000, 90mm: “
The high price is because of the 1986 McClure Volmer act prohibiting sales of new class 3 illegal isn’t it?
That is a bright point and hard to believe.
I have two Ruger 10/22's with Volquartsen Trigger Assemblies, those would be legal over there.
I knew that the U.K. has passed some anti-gun laws some years ago, which is hard to understand, considering its vast and rich firearms manufacturing, ownership and history.
That is a bright point and hard to believe.
I have two Ruger 10/22's with Volquartsen Trigger Assemblies, those would be legal over there.
I knew that the U.K. has passed some anti-gun laws some years ago, which is hard to understand, considering its vast and rich firearms manufacturing, ownership and history.
Actually not. It was only fully automatic weapons that were restricted in 1986. The 90mm is a “destructive device” (and in this case I’d say the BATF actually is accurate) and their supply has been limited for some time. I think that something was done in 1968 to limit the supply, because until then you could purchase WWII PAK 37s and PAK 41s in several calibers (37mm & 42mm I think I remember seeing advertised)
“That is a bright point and hard to believe”
These rifles are legal (for now)because of their mechanism (not semi auto) and the fact that there is no upper limit on calibre for rifles. They have attracted some attention though of those who would like to prohibit them (see the bit on the site about anti materiel weapons), so I don’t know for how much longer we can own them. Something to bear in mind when paying $10,000+ for a rifle and I got burned 10 years ago when I had to export my handguns because they were banned.
“I knew that the U.K. has passed some anti-gun laws some years ago, which is hard to understand, considering its vast and rich firearms manufacturing, ownership and history.”
This explains things well as far as I can see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_the_United_Kingdom
“Actually not. It was only fully automatic weapons that were restricted in 1986. The 90mm is a destructive device (and in this case Id say the BATF actually is accurate) and their supply has been limited for some time.”
I stand corrected:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_Owners_Protection_Act
BUMP
Must have .... MUST HAVE :)
Score
I have settled for a .45-70 Marlin and a single-shot Harrington and Richardson. I can get .45-70 ammo from around $1 per round if I reload or find bargains.
It isn't really exotic but it sure is a big bang, with a big fireball and lots of recoil, if you use hot ammo. It approaches the .458 Winchester magnum.
Big gun! :)
“If you want exotic, you are going to have to pay for ammo. Here in the states, .50 BMG ammo is around $4 per round (or two pounds for you per bang). I can’t imagine what 20mm ammo might sell for. A lot.”
Prices for 50bmg here.
“http://fcsa.co.uk/uk_suppliers.htm"
TBH think I’ll have to turn down the prospect on this occasion - too much of a jump.
Thanks!
“Thanks!”
No problem; some advice: be careful about whom to rely on to defend gun rights. Some of the most ignorant, bigoted people around are...other shooters who don’t own the same types of firearms that you do and cannot see any reason why you should have them. They also think their property will be safeguarded if you lose yours. :-(
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.