Posted on 12/18/2007 10:07:29 AM PST by crazyshrink
When a shot is fired, one expects to see a person with a gun. In the same way, whenever a giant star explodes, astronomers expect to see a galaxy of stars surrounding the site of the blast. This comes right out of basic astronomy, since almost all stars in our universe belong to galaxies.
Image right: The robotic Palomar 60-inch telescope imaged the afterglow of GRB 070125 on January 26, 2007. Right: An image taken of the same field on February 16 with the 10-meter Keck I telescope reveals no trace of an afterglow, or a host galaxy. The white cross in this zoom-in view marks the GRB’s location. The two nearest galaxies, and their distances, are marked with arrows. Credit: B. Cenko, et al. and the W. M. Keck Observatory. Tadpole HST.jpg + Click for larger image + Click for unlabeled version
But a stellar explosion seen last January has shocked astronomers because when they looked for the star’s parent galaxy, they saw nothing at all. The explosion took place in the middle of nowhere, far away from any detectable galaxy. The astronomers saw no hint of a galaxy even though they looked for one with the world’s largest telescope: the giant Keck I telescope in Hawaii.
"Here we have this very bright burst, yet it's surrounded by darkness on all sides," says Brad Cenko, an astronomer at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, Calif. Cenko is the leader of the team that made this discovery. The team includes astronomers from both Caltech and Penn State University.
The explosion belongs to a class of events know as gamma-ray bursts, or GRBs for short. GRBs are triggered when a very heavy star can no longer produce energy. The core of the star implodes to form a black hole — a region of space where gravity is so strong that nothing, not even light, can escape. The black hole spins very fast, producing intense magnetic fields. As inrushing gas from the star spirals toward the black hole, the magnetic fields fling some of the material away from the black hole in two powerful jets. These jets produce the GRB.
Image left: A recent galaxy collision produced the long tail in the Tadpole Galaxy. If GRB 070125 exploded in a similar tail, only Hubble could detect the tail. Credit: NASA, H. Ford, et al. + Click for a larger image. + Click for print resolution version.
Several spacecraft detected the explosion on January 25, 2007. Observations by NASA's Swift satellite pinpointed the explosion, named GRB 070125 for its detection date, to a region of sky in the constellation Gemini. It was one of the brightest bursts of the year, and the Caltech/Penn State team moved quickly to observe the burst’s location with large telescopes on the ground.
Using the team's robotic 60-inch telescope at Palomar Observatory in Calif., the astronomers discovered that the burst had a bright afterglow that was fading fast. They observed the afterglow in detail with two of the world's largest telescopes, the Gemini North telescope and the Keck I telescope, both near the summit of Hawaii's Mauna Kea.
What came next was a total surprise. Contrary to experience with more than a hundred previous GRBs, The Gemini and Keck observations saw no trace of a galaxy at the burst’s location. "A Keck image could have revealed a very small, faint galaxy at that distance," says team member Derek Fox of Penn State.
So why didn’t the team see a galaxy? One possibility is that the star formed in the outskirts of two galaxies that are colliding. Hubble Space Telescope images of colliding galaxies show that many of them have long star tails that are produced by the gravity of the two galaxies. These tails are very faint, and would not show up in Keck images at the burst’s measured distance from Earth. If this idea is correct, it should be possible to detect the tail by taking a long exposure with Hubble. "That's definitely our next stop," says Cenko.
"Many Swift discoveries have left astronomers scratching their heads in befuddlement," adds Swift lead scientist Neil Gehrels of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "But this discovery of a long GRB with no host galaxy is one of the most perplexing of all."
Robert Naeye NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Nothing wrong with that...I have (at last count) over 50 of the books.
50 books? Yikes.
Billions of years ago. Redshift >/~1.54.
Yeah, I'm a geek. I saw Episode IV on opening night, 1977...
I was only 4 yrs old back then. LOL!
Bob was making a beer run, Lori as usual was talking to her mom on her cell and Larry was surfing porn sites.........Nobody was looking thru the telescope.
It was cloudy.
So true!
a stellar explosion seen last January has shocked astronomers because when they looked for the star's parent galaxy, they saw nothing at all. The explosion took place in the middle of nowhere, far away from any detectable galaxy. The astronomers saw no hint of a galaxy even though they looked for one with the world's largest telescope... The explosion belongs to a class of events know as gamma-ray bursts, or GRBs for short. GRBs are triggered when a very heavy star can no longer produce energy.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||
Thanks....
unrelated:
Caught on tape: Death star galaxy
AP on Yahoo | 12/17/07 | Seth Borenstein - ap
Posted on 12/17/2007 4:48:05 PM EST by NormsRevenge
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1940835/posts
Taste my death ray, 3C321! (Astronomy)
Bad Astronomy Blog | 12/17/07 | Phil Plait
Posted on 12/17/2007 8:52:56 PM EST by LibWhacker
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1940971/posts
Galaxy blasts neighbor with deadly jet (NASA labels it the “death star Galaxy”)
MSNBC | December 17, 2007 | Dave Mosher
Posted on 12/18/2007 1:27:57 PM EST by NYer
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1941292/posts
:’) My pleasure.
My first thought, “There’s a disturbance in the galaxy...as though a hundred thousand voices cried out.”
(Or something like that...)
Stay on the Light Side. We have Skywalker :)
Keep the cookies, we have the filling ;)
I was 8
Fascinating. bmflr.
.
.
.
According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.