Skip to comments.
Ancient Jawbone Could Shake Up Fossil Record [ Australopithecus anamensis ]
National Geographic News ^
| Friday the 13th, July 2007
| Nick Wadhams
Posted on 07/17/2007 9:32:39 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
Jawbones from an early human ancestor, found recently in northeast Ethiopia, could shine light on a murky period of human evolution, paleontologists say. The bones were found in the fossil-rich Afar region, just 20 miles (32 kilometers) north of the spot where the famed skeleton of "Lucy" -- early human ancestor who lived 3.2 million years ago -- was unearthed in 1974... The new bones are believed to date from 3.8 million to 3.5 million years ago. Though more research needs to be done, the group says the bones could bridge the gap between two known human ancestor species. Australopithecus anamensis lived some 4.2 million to 3.9 million years ago, and Australopithecus afarensis -- the species to which Lucy belonged -- thrived from 3.6 million to 3 million years ago... Some researchers believe that Lucy and others of her species were descendants of A. anamensis -- and these new Ethiopian jawbones could end that speculation... "We have had isolated teeth and [other skeleton parts] from previous years. What we didn't have was a complete jaw, which we have now," he said... The earlier species, A. anamensis, had large canine teeth and a narrow jaw. When Lucy appeared, compared to A. anamensis, the jaw had widened, the canines had become smaller, and the molars had grown. Such changes suggest that the A. afarensis chewed, not tore, its food.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...
TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: anamensis; australopithecus; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; lucy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
An ancient jawbone, above, was recently found in Africa's fossil-rich Afar region, just 20 miles (32 kilometers) north of the spot where the famed skeleton of "Lucy," an early human ancestor, was unearthed in 1974. The bone, which is at least 3.5 million years old, may spark further debate about how many types of human ancestors roamed East Africa at once. Photograph courtesy Cleveland Museum of Natural History/Handout/REUTERS |
|
1
posted on
07/17/2007 9:32:41 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
2
posted on
07/17/2007 9:33:04 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Australopithecus anamensis site:freerepublic.com
Google
3
posted on
07/17/2007 9:33:15 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
4
posted on
07/17/2007 9:33:38 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
They found Harry Reid’s jawbone? Go figger...
5
posted on
07/17/2007 9:36:22 AM PDT
by
Monkey Face
("Equal opportunity" means everyone will have a fair chance at being incompetent. ~~ L J Pete)
To: SunkenCiv
the famed skeleton of "Lucy" -- early human ancestor who lived 3.2 million years ago Wrong! It has been clearly demonstrated that "Lucy" is not a human ancestor!
6
posted on
07/17/2007 9:39:03 AM PDT
by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: LiteKeeper
cool, this topic is about to become another
and
7
posted on
07/17/2007 9:53:12 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Monkey Face
...who lives in glass house...
;’)
8
posted on
07/17/2007 9:54:13 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
9
posted on
07/17/2007 9:55:39 AM PDT
by
Monkey Face
("Equal opportunity" means everyone will have a fair chance at being incompetent. ~~ L J Pete)
To: SunkenCiv
When they invent time travel, remind me that dentistry would be a good paying profession.
10
posted on
07/17/2007 10:07:52 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: LiteKeeper
It always amazes me how they can jump to conclusions with only one find.
11
posted on
07/17/2007 10:08:34 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: SunkenCiv
12
posted on
07/17/2007 10:08:52 AM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: SunkenCiv
Cool search tool; I never knew you could do that with Google.
To: mtbopfuyn
14
posted on
07/17/2007 10:14:45 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: FourtySeven
15
posted on
07/17/2007 10:30:24 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday the 13th, July 2007. Trisdecaphobia! https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
I suppose they’re going to try to determine every intimate detail of this dude’s society, from music to architecture, based on this one mandible.
16
posted on
07/17/2007 11:14:44 AM PDT
by
shekkian
To: Coyoteman
It has been clearly demonstrated that "Lucy" is not a human ancestor! Care to comment Doc?
17
posted on
07/17/2007 11:23:05 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant.)
To: mtbopfuyn
well paying in beads and hides?
:)
18
posted on
07/17/2007 11:27:55 AM PDT
by
absolootezer0
(Stop repeat offenders. Don't re-elect them!)
To: LiteKeeper
Wrong! It has been clearly demonstrated that "Lucy" is not a human ancestor! By who? That creationism museum near Cincinnati?
19
posted on
07/17/2007 11:39:49 AM PDT
by
Non-Sequitur
(Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
To: ASA Vet
It has been clearly demonstrated that "Lucy" is not a human ancestor! Care to comment Doc?
Last I saw that is correct.
On a direct line from earlier to later critters, Lucy and her kin seem to have diverged slightly from the main line.
The following chart illustrates how this can occur.
20
posted on
07/17/2007 11:40:23 AM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson