To: ASA Vet
It has been clearly demonstrated that "Lucy" is not a human ancestor! Care to comment Doc?
Last I saw that is correct.
On a direct line from earlier to later critters, Lucy and her kin seem to have diverged slightly from the main line.
The following chart illustrates how this can occur.
20 posted on
07/17/2007 11:40:23 AM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Coyoteman
Thank you sir, that’s why one should always check with a subject matter expert.
24 posted on
07/17/2007 12:03:18 PM PDT by
ASA Vet
(Pray for the deliberately ignorant.)
To: Coyoteman
The following chart illustrates how this can occur.You choose to believe that your ancestors were apes, I'll believe that God created mine in His own image ;o)
28 posted on
07/23/2007 3:48:41 PM PDT by
4CJ
(Annoy a liberal, honour Christians and our gallant Confederate dead)
To: Coyoteman
That is a pretty picture made by speculation.
Science only deals with the hear and now. It can only speculate about the past and only make assumptions of the future.
The article is filled with assumptions.
Or was that a date on the jaw bone I saw.
Dating methods only fulfill evolutionary needs, they are all that is all speculative, assumptive, and indecisive.
45 posted on
07/27/2007 5:42:40 PM PDT by
Creationist
( Evolution is a faith based science with no proof. Scientist are the prophets, teachers the preacher)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson