[Creationist]

That is a pretty picture made by speculation.

Science only deals with the hear and now. It can only speculate about the past and only make assumptions of the future.

The article is filled with assumptions.

Or was that a date on the jaw bone I saw.

Dating methods only fulfill evolutionary needs, they are all that is all speculative, assumptive, and indecisive.

[Coyoteman]

That is a pretty picture made by speculation.

Science only deals with the hear and now. It can only speculate about the past and only make assumptions of the future.

The article is filled with assumptions.

Or was that a date on the jaw bone I saw.

Dating methods only fulfill evolutionary needs, they are all that is all speculative, assumptive, and indecisive.

If you have a specific problem with my post, please state it.

Otherwise, your post is generic, unsupported anti-science nonsense.

About all I can glean from your post is that you don't like "dating methods." Please examine the links below and let me know what you would like help on.

ReligiousTolerance.org Carbon-14 Dating (C-14): Beliefs of New-Earth Creationists

Radiometric Dating: A Christian Perspective by Dr. Roger C. Wiens.

This site, BiblicalChronologist.org has a series of good articles on radiocarbon dating.

Are tree-ring chronologies reliable? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)

How does the radiocarbon dating method work? (The Biblical Chronologist, Vol. 5, No. 1)

How precise is radiocarbon dating?

Is radiocarbon dating based on assumptions?

Has radiocarbon dating been invalidated by unreasonable results?

Tree Ring and C14 Dating

Radiocarbon WEB-info Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Waikato, New Zealand.

Radiocarbon -- full text of issues, 1959-2003.

[RightWhale]

Science only deals with the hear and now.

Hear and now? or hear and see?