Posted on 07/09/2007 11:02:04 AM PDT by redstates4ever
The guy in the first picture — is that like a target he’s wearing?
I’m sure you meant Village Idiots.
Heh - ya got me there! :-P
You want to see kooks on 9/11, head over the LP....(chuckle)
(Shall we hold a vote? LOL Should we include other descriptions like wuss?)
Indeed, yukon, indeed!
Yeah, several do. The rest fit my original description though.
Look at your paycheck stub. See the line that says “Federal Withholdings?”
I went to the site in the sign and I saw no mention of who or what these “Top physicists” are.
They are too embarrased to list them.
Or a Muslim physicist.
At least they all look the part they’re playing.
Yeah you are right, I would not put that past leftists.
Damn it. Forgot about that!.
For some real live 9/11 moonbats check this out
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=125
These guys look just like the ones standing outside our local Labor Ready “Work Today, Paid Today” office. Or maybe it’s the guys holding the Kmart “90% off” plackard.
For $8/hr, I’m sure they’ll hold signs that say just about anything.
GSD
You know, 50 years ago if our country was attacked the people would be infuriatingly mad at the attackers and would stand behind their country in support of their effort to eliminate the evil. Now they come up with lies trying to pin the blame on their own president.
If 9/11 can be partially blamed on any US official, it’s Clinton’s fault for taking no action against terrorists and letting them continue to bomb US embassies and government buildings. These people seem to think Bush wants the war just for kicks (or at least, that’s the excuse they’ve made up to justify their propaganda here). That’s lunacy. Nobody goes to war just for the sake of creating a war. We’re there to kill terrorists. If we don’t, they’ll come back with another 9/11 and these loonies won’t have the prez to blame. Oh and they never tell you who these “top physicsists” are. Just as Gore never tells you who the “leading scientists” are in his film. Liberals never tell you who their “scientists” are because there aren’t any, they made it all up. It’s kind of ironic how they’re all standing around with signs that say LIES when they’re all propagating a lie themselves.
You seem like a paranoid nut to make those kinds of comments.
I think that NIST has concluded that it wasn't so much the diesel fuel and fire, but greater damage from falling debris than had been realized previously.
I took a look at the Popular Mechanics article debunking the Truthers. They point to a number of factors, none of which involves Haliburton, Texas, Skull and Bones, Bilderbergers, aliens, Masons, da Vinci, The VRWC, or Thailand. The building was, as you say, more heavily damaged by debris from the towers than was previously thought. There were also several diesel tanks in the building including one large one in the basement that was believed to be pressurized. Also, the building’s design put a lot of stress onto a few supports. Add all this together with the fact that the FDNY couldn’t enter the building to fight the fire, which burned for hours and hours, and you have a collapse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.