Skip to comments.
Study: Prehistoric Man Had Sex for Fun
Fox News ^
| Sunday, April 29, 2007
| Unknown
Posted on 04/29/2007 3:54:15 PM PDT by cougar_mccxxi
He may have come down from the trees, but prehistoric man did not stop swinging. New research into Stone Age humans has argued that, far from having intercourse simply to reproduce, they had sex for fun.
Practices ranging from bondage to group sex, transvestism and the use of sex toys were widespread in primitive societies as a way of building up cultural ties.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: crevo; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; good; homosexualagenda; networks; news; no
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: Slings and Arrows
41
posted on
04/29/2007 7:49:01 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republians - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
To: cougar_mccxxi
Just think! This is a perfect example of humans engaged in monkey business.
42
posted on
04/29/2007 8:55:22 PM PDT
by
punster
To: KoRn; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
Dibs on Barbara Bach.
43
posted on
04/29/2007 9:27:19 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
("I AM A SEXY SHOELESS GOD OF WAR!!!" --http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0439.html)
To: Slings and Arrows
LOL! I remember seeing that at a theater when I was very young. I think I was 5 or so.
44
posted on
04/29/2007 9:33:07 PM PDT
by
KoRn
(Just Say NO ....To Liberal Republians - FRED THOMPSON FOR PRESIDENT!)
To: KoRn
Amazing what causes childhood traumas to resurface.
45
posted on
04/29/2007 9:39:08 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
("I AM A SEXY SHOELESS GOD OF WAR!!!" --http://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0439.html)
To: the invisib1e hand
Now thats a scary concept. And like you I wonder at times if Mans archetypal memories/symbols are rather precursors of what may lie in mans future, should he in total turn away from his creator.
46
posted on
04/29/2007 9:42:29 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: outofstyle
Direct evidence? Oh its even more direct than that, they build up a ape-man ancestor from not more than a handful of bone fragments which are supposedly 1.7 million years old.
47
posted on
04/29/2007 9:45:55 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: cougar_mccxxi
“Experts believe research such as Taylors may help overturn false assumptions that sex for the purposes of reproduction is the form closest to nature.”
You know what else is closest to nature, eating raw meat, drinking water from scum filled ponds, doing your business in the wilderness, and even resorting to canabalism? Why would we want to be like nature or uncivilized men?
48
posted on
04/30/2007 1:50:22 AM PDT
by
Pinkbell
(Hunter/Thompson)
To: cougar_mccxxi
That is about the most irrational bunch of conclusions a person could reach for.
49
posted on
04/30/2007 8:55:47 AM PDT
by
john6
(http://schenectady-politics-prose-crits.blogspot.com)
To: cougar_mccxxi
I lose more respect for Fox as each day goes by.
To: cougar_mccxxi
Typical.
Seems evolution discussion has hit baseball boards also with some alcoholic gambler who calls himself "The Doc" an ET believer, "ktjc" who considers the Bible's book Revelation, "Revelations" and some even more dire characters that actually believe they've got a handle on the Bible, and evolution is a fact.
Hopefully this link will take you there. If not I must be the missing link. http://www.forums.mlb.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ml-mlb&tid=65659
51
posted on
05/01/2007 6:29:23 AM PDT
by
Karliner
("Things are more like they are now than they ever were before. DDE)
To: Karliner
52
posted on
05/01/2007 6:32:15 AM PDT
by
Karliner
("Things are more like they are now than they ever were before. DDE)
To: cougar_mccxxi
Practices ranging from bondage to group sex, transvestism and the use of sex toys were widespread in primitive societies as a way of building up cultural ties.
Proof? Where's the proof?
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
Hey, that was long before the Internet, or even TV. Lotta time on their hands.
Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks. Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
55
posted on
05/01/2007 10:01:58 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on Saturday, April 28, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: cougar_mccxxi
Humans, by contrast, are far less easy to distinguish by size. Taylor says that prominent male genitals and female breasts developed to aid recognition of the opposite sex in creatures of similar size and shape. The similarity in size, combined with the ease of face-to-face sex, allowed intercourse to become a vital part of social interaction, communication and inventiveness.HMmmm.... I don't know....
Kinda hard to tell...
56
posted on
05/02/2007 4:45:27 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: cripplecreek
Sex toys leaves evidence but the group sex, transvestism, etc left what evidence? Evidence?
HARD evidence!
Remember it's all in how you read the stone fossils.
Even today we are reminded: "If you remain hard for more than 4 hours..."
57
posted on
05/02/2007 4:47:16 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Where's the proof?
58
posted on
05/02/2007 4:51:13 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Elsie
Taylor says that prominent male genitals and female breasts developed to aid recognition of the opposite sex in creatures of similar size and shape. Silly me. I thought breasts were for making milk to feed the baby. I wonder how many other species made it without such obvious differences?
It's no wonder scientists lose more and more credibility each day.
59
posted on
05/02/2007 4:57:15 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
By comparison with modern humans, who appeared about 300,000-100,000 years ago, apes have tiny male genitals, no female breasts and are hairy.
Proto-human female to early hairy-male-cousin: "Who you gonna please with THAT thing??"
EHMC reply:"Ugh! Me; of course!"
60
posted on
05/02/2007 4:57:23 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson