Skip to comments.
Study: Prehistoric Man Had Sex for Fun
Fox News ^
| Sunday, April 29, 2007
| Unknown
Posted on 04/29/2007 3:54:15 PM PDT by cougar_mccxxi
He may have come down from the trees, but prehistoric man did not stop swinging. New research into Stone Age humans has argued that, far from having intercourse simply to reproduce, they had sex for fun.
Practices ranging from bondage to group sex, transvestism and the use of sex toys were widespread in primitive societies as a way of building up cultural ties.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: crevo; evolution; godsgravesglyphs; good; homosexualagenda; networks; news; no
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: Sherman Logan
Im still trying to figure out how they get transvestism, group sex and sex toys out of a couple of statues. They must be projecting their own behavior.
21
posted on
04/29/2007 4:06:28 PM PDT
by
Popman
(New American Dream: Move to Mexican, cross the border, become an illegal. free everything)
To: the invisib1e hand
That got me thinking. Suppose, instead of being predecessors, they are successors -- that is, they are what humans become, over a long enough course of generations, if unredeemed, if left to their own predilection to turn away from their Creator.
And thus was born... THE PLANET OF THE APES!
22
posted on
04/29/2007 4:07:33 PM PDT
by
SoldierMedic
(Rowan Walter, 23 Feb 2007)
To: LdSentinal
“Tina’s here! We’re getting back together!”
To: Cicero
may help overturn false assumptions that sex for the purposes of reproduction is the form closest to nature.Someone has confused human nature for Natural Law. And God help us if we we base our morality on what it "closest to nature."
25
posted on
04/29/2007 4:11:30 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: capt. norm
Well, that one guy and his girlfriend are getting back together.
26
posted on
04/29/2007 4:11:55 PM PDT
by
CaptRon
(Pedicaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: cougar_mccxxi
What we’re gonna do right here is go back, way back, back into time.
When the only people that existed were troglodytes...cave men...
cave women...Neanderthal...troglodytes. Let’s take the average
cave man at home, listening to his stereo. Sometimes he’d get up,
try to do his thing. He’d begin to move, something like this:
“Dance...dance”. When he got tired of dancing alone, he’d look
in the mirror: “Gotta find a woman gotta find a woman gotta find a
woman gotta find a woman”. He’d go down to the lake where all the
woman would be swimming or washing clothes or something. He’d look
around and just reach in and grab one. “Come here...come here”.
He’d grab her by the hair. You can’t do that today, fellas, cause
it might come off. You’d have a piece of hair in your hand and she’d
be swimming away from you (ha-ha). This one woman just lay there,
wet and frightened. He said: “Move...move”. She got up. She was a
big woman. BIG woman. Her name was Bertha. Bertha Butt. She was one
of the Butt sisters. He didn’t care. He looked up at her and said:
“Sock it to me sock it to me sock it to me sock it to me sock it to me
sock it to me sock it to me sock it to me!”. She looked down on him.
She was ready to crush him, but she began to like him. She said
(falsetto):
“I’ll sock it to ya, Daddy”. He said: “Wha?”. She said (falsetto):
“I’ll sock it to ya, Daddy”. You know what he said? He started it way
back then. I wouldn’t lie to you. When she said (falsetto)
“I’ll sock it to ya, Daddy” he said “Right on! Right on! Hotpants!
Hotpants! Ugh...ugh...ugh
27
posted on
04/29/2007 4:13:09 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: cripplecreek
I know leftists like to rewrite history, but prehistory? We simply cannot know what sexual practices were 30000 years and any speculation along those lines is just that- speculation. But at least it isn't entirely baseless speculation like claiming our ancestors were avid transvestites based on stone artifacts.
Petra Boynton, a relationship counselor and health lecturer at University College, London, found the study refreshing.
So much evolutionary theory promotes the idea that humans, particularly women, are preprogrammed for monogamy, but that is often simply overlaying science on a pre-existing view of society,
And this isn't someone else masquerading their own pre-conceived views on society as science? Good to know relationship counselors are suddenly experts on prehistoric promiscuous homosexual ape sex. Next thing you know the mortar and pestle in a nearby museum will be renamed mortar and pestle/dildo.
Sounds like it's time for some grant money, tenures, and degrees to be revoked.
28
posted on
04/29/2007 4:13:35 PM PDT
by
verum ago
(The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
To: the invisib1e hand
he other day I noticed a picture, on the subway, of what appeared to be a primate. Its eyes, whether real or photoshopped, looked unmistakeably...intelligent, aware, human.
That got me thinking. Suppose, instead of being predecessors, they are successors -- that is, they are what humans become, over a long enough course of generations, if unredeemed, if left to their own predilection to turn away from their Creator.
Hey, it was just a thought.
Planet of the Apes and The Time Machine come to mind.
29
posted on
04/29/2007 4:15:53 PM PDT
by
verum ago
(The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
To: centurion316
Damn, I forgot all about beta.
30
posted on
04/29/2007 4:17:08 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Millee
Ping...but I don’t know why...
31
posted on
04/29/2007 4:18:04 PM PDT
by
JRios1968
(This tagline brought to you by courtesy of Happygrl)
To: SoldierMedic; verum ago
oh, so it’s apparently not so whacky an idea. I never really watched those movies. Didn’t get into that series about the rat, either. What was it, “Ben?” I was too busy watching the Rockford Files.
To: cougar_mccxxi
Timothy Taylor
researcher
"theoretical archaeologist"
and desperate man
33
posted on
04/29/2007 4:21:45 PM PDT
by
verum ago
(The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
To: cougar_mccxxi
Heck, why not? Bonobos have sex for fun all the time - literally! - so primitive man probably had it pretty well figured out, too.
34
posted on
04/29/2007 4:47:17 PM PDT
by
Grut
To: verum ago
To: dfwgator
To: verum ago
Timothy Taylor
researcher
“theoretical archaeologist”
and desperate man
Looks like he couldn’t get a date in a pitch-dark bathhouse.
37
posted on
04/29/2007 6:21:45 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(.The Muzzies are hanging us with the rope we paid out to the leftists.)
To: Sherman Logan
OTOH, some other primates have pretty active and varied sex lives.And how do you know about this?
38
posted on
04/29/2007 6:24:31 PM PDT
by
John123
(Bill barely mentions Hillary in his memoirs... I will now light myself on fire)
To: outofstyle
a 30,000-year-old statue of a naked woman -- the Venus of Willendorf -- and an equally ancient stone phallus found in a German cave, provide the earliest direct evidence that sex was about far more than babies. Direct evidence?
Don't you know art when you see it? Philistine!
39
posted on
04/29/2007 6:27:02 PM PDT
by
John123
(Bill barely mentions Hillary in his memoirs... I will now light myself on fire)
To: John123
Well, I’ve read about some of the monkeys and apes. They party pretty hard, particularly the howler monkeys.
Chimpanzees practice war and cannibalism.
Orangutans are big on rape.
The natural world isn’t always all that nice.
40
posted on
04/29/2007 7:47:52 PM PDT
by
Sherman Logan
(I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson